Abstract
This article investigates Fole Mako, a significant traditional communal feast in Noemuti, North Central Timor, Indonesia. The event is analyzed in the context of its deliberate timing to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish and the consecration of a new church. Using the Ethnography of Communication framework, a detailed analysis is provided of the intricate communication practices, profound cultural meanings, and vital social functions embedded within this elaborate feast. Data for the study were meticulously collected through direct observation and engaged participation. The findings reveal that Fole Mako is much more than a mere banquet. It serves as a profound mechanism for strengthening shared communal identity, expressing collective gratitude, and demonstrating an extraordinary capacity to harmonize traditional customs with contemporary religious celebrations. This enduring cultural practice highlights the community’s agency in fostering social cohesion and cultural resilience, proving that traditions can thrive in an evolving social context.
Bahasa Abstract
Artikel ini mengkaji upacara adat Fole Mako, sebuah pesta upacara tradisonal yang penting di Noemuti, Timor Tengah Utara, Indonesia. Acara ini diteliti dalam konteks waktu yang bertepatan dengan peringatan 100 tahun Paroki Hati Kudus Yesus dan pentahbisan gereja baru. Dengan menggunakan kerangka kerja Etnografi Komunikasi, analisis terperinci diberikan mengenai praktik komunikasi yang rumit, makna budaya yang mendalam, dan fungsi sosial vital yang tertanam dalam pesta adat yang rumit ini. Data untuk penelitian ini dikumpulkan secara cermat melalui observasi langsung dan partisipasi yang intensif. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa Fole Mako lebih dari sekadar perjamuan. Fole Mako berfungsi sebagai mekanisme yang mendalam untuk memperkuat identitas komunal bersama, mengekspresikan rasa syukur kolektif, dan menunjukkan kapasitas luar biasa untuk menyelaraskan adat istiadat tradisional dengan perayaan keagamaan kontemporer. Praktik budaya yang lestari ini menyoroti peran komunitas dalam membina kohesi sosial dan ketahanan budaya, membuktikan bahwa tradisi dapat berkembang dalam konteks sosial yang terus berkembang.
References
Ande, A., S. S. Utomo, A. A. D. Lehan, and A. Saefudin. 2025. “Ritual language in Korolele ceremony: Local wisdom, cultural identity, and moral education.” International Journal of Society, Culture & Language 13, no. 1: 173–184.
Apriliyadi, Illi, and Giyarto. 2025. “The SPEAKING of the earth: Ethnography of cultural communication in the Sedekah Bumi ritual in Jetak Hamlet, Bogorejo Subdistrict, Blora Regency.” Renai: Research and Advocacy Journal in Social Sciences and Humanities 11, no. 2: 146–154. https://renai-journal.percik.or.id/index.php/renai/article/view/59 (accessed October 13, 2025).
Bauk, Maria, Yoseph Bria, and Elisabeth Tana. 2024. “Life cycle ceremonies and local wisdom of Atoni Pah Meto in East Amanuban.” Ledalero Journal 4, no. 2: 120–135. https://www.google.com/search?q=http://ejurnal.iftkledalero.ac.id/index.php/JLe/article/download/548/pdf (accessed October 13, 2025).
Fox, James J. 2008. The flow of life: Essays on Eastern Indonesian systems. Leiden, Netherlands: KITLV Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Handayani, Susi, and Eko Wibowo. 2021. “The symbolic meaning of Sego Wiwit in Javanese traditional ceremony: An ethnocultural study.” Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan 19, no. 1 (March): 25–38. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkp/article/view/30018 (accessed October 13, 2025).
Hicks, David. 2017. “Lisan, state, church and community.” In Displacement, syncretism and continuity: Local perspectives on Christianity in Indonesia, edited by Maribeth Erb and Harriett Moore, 78–95. London: Routledge.
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “Models of the interaction of language and social life.” In Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Li, Jie. 2017. “Feasting, reciprocity and social capital in rural China.” Asian Studies Review 41, no. 1: 151–170.
Matradewi, N. K. W., L. Judijanto, M. A. Anggreni, F. Fahruddin, and A. Saefudin. 2025. “Ethnolinguistic dimensions of the Korolele ceremony: Ritual language for character education.” Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research 6, no. 1: 25–32.
Mokos, I., and V. Puspita. 2024. “Mot nini tradition: Dialogue with ancestors in Noemuti Village.” Journal of Intercultural Communication 24, no. 1: 88–99.
Putri, Desak P. M. F. A., and N. N. R. Widyastuti. 2020. “Ethnography of communication: The analysis of Dell Hymes’s SPEAKING in Balinese wedding proposal.” BAHTERA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra 19, no. 2 : 185–194. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/bahtera/article/view/17062/9821 (accessed October 13, 2025).
Rosaldo, Renato. 1989. Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
S., Wahyuni. 2021. “Komunikasi ritual Ngopi Bareng sebagai media komunikasi lintas generasi di Kabupaten Bondowoso.” Jurnal Komunika 10, no. 1: 1–16. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://journal.unira.ac.id/index.php/komunika/article/view/1785 (accessed October 13, 2025).
Tallo, Petrus. 2022. “The significance of corn and meat in the Atoni Pah Meto rites of passage.” Widyariset: Jurnal Ilmu Budaya 5, no. 2: 45–56.
Taneo, M., A. Madu, and F. A. Ndoen. 2024. “The cultural heritage of Ume Kbubu: Strengthening Atoin Meto identity through school learning.” Journal of Intercultural Communication 24, no. 3: 88–103.
Turner, Victor. 1969. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Wulansari, Desi. 2018. “Christianity and local wisdom: A study of syncretism in East Nusa Tenggara.” Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 7, no. 1: 30–45.
Recommended Citation
Mokos, Inosensius E. 2026. FEAST AND FAITH: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE IN NOEMUTI'S FOLE MAKO. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya 16, no. 1 (April). 10.17510/paradigma.v16i1.1884.
Included in
Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons, Organizational Communication Commons
