•  
  •  
 

Editorial Policies

Submission and processing of Manuscript in Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya
The editing conducts an initial assessment of each document. The author should submit the full text manuscript for review. After the review, the editor decides whether to accept or to reject manuscripts.
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya conducted an anonymous double review. The journal does not inform the reviewer's identity to the author and the reviewer does not know the author's identity. The review team will know the author's identity then the journal is published.


The editor will ask two reviewers to review each manuscript. If the reviews indicate a conflict, the editor will send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

The review process usually takes four to six months. The documents will be sent to the review team by the system, and if necessary, correspondence will be done by email.
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya uses plagiarism detection services iThenticate and Turnitin to ensure the integrity of each manuscripts.


Publication Frequency
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya is published three times a year. Issues are identified by Volume and Number.

Open Access Policy
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya provides open access based on principles that allow the academics to use the research results directly. Thus, Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya supports the knowledge exchange at the global level.
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya (p-issn: 2087-6017; e-issn: 2503-0868) Faculty of Humanities uses license


Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional.
You are allowed to
Share — copy and distribute these materials in any form or format;
Adaptation — compose, modify, and make derivatives of the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes.
The licensor cannot revoke the above terms as long as you follow the terms of this license.
Based on the following conditions
Attribution — You must include an appropriate name, a license link, and certify that changes have been made.. You can do this in any proper way but not imply that the licensor supports you.
Share Alike — If you compose, modify, or create derivatives of this material, you must distribute your contribution under the same license as the original material.
No additional restrictions — You may not use legal provisions or technological control tools that legally restrict others from performing the actions permitted by this license.


Notification
You do not need to comply with a license for any part of the material placed in the public domain or for any use permitted under an exception or restriction.
No warranty is given by this license. This license may not provide appropriate permissions for your intended use. Other rights, such as the portrait right, privacy right, or moral right, may restrict the use of CC-licensed material.

Author Fees
  1. Document Submission Fee. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya does not charge a submission fee. Thus, the decision to accept or reject a document is given to all authors who submit theirs. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budayaalso does not charge a document processing fee. The cost of reviewing and editing the documents is the responsibility of this journal.
  2. Document Publication Fee. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya does not charge publication fee. Journal can access online publications for free. The cost of printing the documents to publish the printed version of the journal is the responsibility, but readers of the printed journal must pay for the printing costs.

Post-Publication Policy Statement
This journal is dedicated to upholding academic integrity by providing a platform for Post-Publication Discussion to foster open, transparent, and constructive scientific discourse.
The evaluation of scholarly work is an ongoing process; therefore, we welcome post-publication comments, scientific critiques, and substantive feedback on all published articles.
Submission & Right of Reply
  1. Substantive critiques or comments submitted by readers will be evaluated by the editorial board and forwarded to the original authors to provide a formal response (Author Reply) within a specified timeframe.
  2. The editorial team ensures a fair opportunity for original authors to clarify methodologies, data, or conclusions in response to legitimate scientific inquiries.

Moderation & Ethical Conduct
  1. All contributions to Post-Publication Discussion must adhere to professional ethical standards, remain free from conflicts of interest, and be supported by objective scientific evidence.

  2. The editorial board reserves the right to reject or remove comments that contain personal attacks, lack academic relevance, or fail to provide empirical or theoretical substantiation.

Editorial Actions & Corrections
If a post-publication discussion reveals critical errors or serious data integrity issues, the journal will take appropriate corrective actions in accordance with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines, including issuing a Corrigendum, Erratum, or Retraction where necessary.
Correction and Retraction
The journal is committed to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record; therefore, published articles will be corrected or retracted when necessary to preserve scientific validity.
Readers and authors are encouraged to report potential errors or ethical concerns to the editorial office for formal review.
Corrections (Addendum, Erratum, and Corrigendum)
  1. An Erratum or Corrigendum will be published to rectify significant errors that affect the interpretation of the article without compromising its core scientific conclusions or findings.

  2. Minor formatting, typographical, or grammatical errors that do not alter the meaning or data of the manuscript will generally not warrant a formal correction notice.

Article Retractions
  • An article will be retracted in cases of severe scientific misconduct, pervasive data fabrication, falsification, unacknowledged plagiarism, or major unintentional errors that invalidate the main findings.

  • Retraction notices will explicitly state the reasons for the retraction, identify who is initiating the action, and remain transparently linked to the original published manuscript.

    • Editorial Process & Compliance
    1. All investigations and decisions regarding corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions strictly adhere to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

    2. The original article will remain accessible online with a clear watermark indicating its retracted or corrected status to maintain a permanent public record.