Abstract
France's post-World War II, thirty years of glory, resulted in the growth of purchasing power among the French, which triggered growth in consumerism, notably among the bourgeois— France's upper-middle-class society. People believed in a myth that objects are not solely useful for fulfilling needs but also served as a sign of social status, dignity, andcomfort. They equally believed that if the objects are consumed and the associated social standards fulfilled, they maybecome a way to obtain greater happiness. This article aims to examine the myth that happiness can be attained byconsumption and social standard fulfillment in a French consumer society in the 1960s. To do so, Baudrillard’sconsumerism theory is used, which is juxtaposed with Barthes' theories of structural text analysis, semiotics, and myth.This article, whose scope is limited by the narrative elements of the text, shows that the attachment of the people portrayed in the text with consumer goods and social standards can gradually sink the subjectivity of individuals and even erode the unique and principal characteristic that humans share; humanitarian values, as well as generating greater distance between human and true happiness itself.
Bahasa Abstract
Tiga puluh tahun kejayaan Prancis pasca-Perang Dunia II menghasilkan pertumbuhan daya beli masyarakat Prancis, yang memicu berkembangnya konsumerisme, khususnya di kalangan borjuis—kelas menengah atas Prancis. Masyarakat meyakini mitos bahwa benda-benda tidak hanya berguna untuk memenuhi kebutuhan, tetapi juga berfungsi sebagai penanda status sosial, martabat, dan kenyamanan. Mereka juga percaya bahwa jika benda-benda tersebut dikonsumsi dan standar sosial yang menyertainya terpenuhi, maka hal itu dapat menjadi jalan untuk memperoleh kebahagiaan yang lebih besar. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mitos bahwa kebahagiaan dapat dicapai melalui konsumsi dan pemenuhan standar sosial dalam masyarakat konsumeris Prancis pada tahun 1960-an. Untuk itu, digunakan teori konsumerisme Baudrillard yang dipadukan dengan teori analisis tekstual struktural, semiotika, dan mitos dari Barthes. Artikel ini, yang ruang lingkupnya dibatasi oleh unsur naratif dalam teks, menunjukkan bahwa keterikatan tokoh-tokoh dalam teks terhadap barang konsumsi dan standar sosial secara bertahap dapat mengikis subjektivitas individu dan bahkan menggerus ciri khas utama yang dimiliki manusia, yaitu nilai-nilai kemanusiaan, serta menciptakan jarak yang semakin jauh antara manusia dan kebahagiaan sejatinya.
References
Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. Éditions du Seuil.
_______. 1964. “Elements de Semiologie”. Communications 4, 91–135.
_______. 1966. “Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits”. Communications 8, 1–27.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1968. Le système des objets. Éditions Gallimard.
_______. 1970. La société de consommation. Éditions Denoël.
Besirevic, Lana. 2012. “La problématique de la société dans Les Belles Images et La Femme Rompue de Simone de Beauvoir – une analyse du rôle de la société dans la vie des femmes des années 60”. Student thesis. Linnaeus University.
Bonnefous, Édouard. 1987. Avant l’oubli 2: La vie de 1940 à 1970. Nathan.
Cruickshank, Ruth. 2014. “Re-Reading Simone de Beauvoir’s Les Belles Images: The Global Politics of (Not) Eating”. Nottingham French Studies 53, no.1: 76–89.
Dow, Suzanne. 2005 “Simone de Beauvoir’s “La femme rompue”: Reception and Deception”. The Modern Language Review 100, no.3: 6322005644.
Duran, Jane. 2007. Women, Philosophy and Literature. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Eriksson, Louise. 2004. “Mariage et sexualité dans Les Belles Images de Simone de Beauvoir - une comparaison avec les années 60 en France”. Student thesis. Vaxjo University.
Fishwick, Sarah. 1999. “The elusive ‘je’: language and female subjectivity in Simone de Beauvoir’s Les Belles Images”. Modern & Contemporary France 7, no. 4: 471–484.
Hellerstein, Nina S. 2010 “Temporal and Existential Structures in Simone de Beauvoir’s Les Belles Images: Mechanical Reproduction Versus Transcendence”. Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures 54, no. 1: 16–26.
Pagés, Iréne M. 1975 “Beauvoir’s Les Belles Images: ‘’Desubstantification’’ of Reality through a Narrative”. Forum for Modern Language Studies 11, no. 2: 133–141.
Quinan, Christine. 2014. “Technocrats and Tortured Bodies: Simone de Beauvoir’s Les Belles Images.
Women a Cultural Review 25, no. 3: 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2014.981380.
Rochester, Myrna Bell, Mary Lawrence Test, Palo Alto, and South Pasadena. 1985 “Social Dysfunction and Societal Action in the Work of Simone de Beauvoir”. Dalhousie French Studies 9: 117–127, Perspectives sur Sartre et Beauvoir, essais en l’honneur d’Oreste F. Pucciani. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40836323.
Simons, Margaret A. 1986 “Beauvoir and Sartre: The Philosophical Relationship”. Yale French Studies, no. 72 : 165–179. Simone de Beauvoir, Witness to a Century.
Tidd, Ursula. 2004 Simone de Beauvoir. Routledge.
Tjahjani, Joesana. 1995. “Dominasi Benda atas Manusia dalam Les Choses: une histoire des annees soixante Karya Georges Perec (The Dominance of Objects over Humans in Les Choses: a history of the sixties by Georges Perec).” MA thesis, Universitas Indonesia.
_______. 2013 “Ambiguitas Genre dalam Trilogi Les Romanesques Karya Alain Robbe-Grillet (The Ambiguity of Genres in the Trilogy Les Romanesques by Alain Robbe-Grillet).” Dissertation, Universitas Indonesia,
Recommended Citation
Tjahjani, Joesana, and Sekar Dewantari. 2025. MYTH OF HAPPINESS FROM THE CONSUMERISM PERSPECTIVE IN SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR’S LES BELLES IMAGES. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya 15, no. 2 (August). 10.17510/paradigma.v15i2.1570.
Included in
Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Art and Design Commons, Fine Arts Commons, History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, Linguistics Commons, Philosophy Commons
