Abstract
This article examines the colonial stigma attached to Banyuwangi as an “unhealthy region” in the early 20th century, a label used to justify massive exploitation of its natural resources. Using a historical method, this research analyzes how this stigma not only served as a tool for colonial legitimation but also causatively created conditions that triggered ecological disasters and a public health crisis in a previously isolated area. Through an analysis of primary sources such as colonial reports, health journals, and newspapers, this article traces how large-scale plantation exploitation, enabled by the stigma, led to deforestation, uncontrolled labor migration, and poor settlement sanitation. The findings indicate that the combination of environmental degradation and inadequate living conditions created an ideal ecosystem for the outbreak of tropical disease epidemics like malaria and cholera, which were not previously rampant in Banyuwangi. Ironically, the colonial government blamed the lifestyles of the local and migrant populations rather than acknowledging the impact of its own policies. This article also reveals that efforts to improve health conditions and eradicate the stigma in the late 1920s, through the provision of clean water, elimination of mosquito breeding grounds, and modernization of health facilities, were only undertaken after the stigma backfired and began to impede colonial economic interests. Thus, this study concludes that the health crisis in Banyuwangi was a direct product of exploitative policies grounded in stigma, demonstrating the intricate link between colonial narratives, environmental destruction, and public health in peripheral regions.
Bahasa Abstract
Artikel ini mengkaji stigma kolonial yang dilekatkan pada Banyuwangi sebagai “daerah tidak sehat” pada awal abad ke-20, sebuah label yang digunakan untuk membenarkan eksploitasi besar-besaran terhadap sumber daya alamnya. Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah, penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana stigma tersebut tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat legitimasi kolonial, tetapi juga secara kausal menciptakan kondisi yang memicu bencana ekologis dan krisis kesehatan masyarakat di wilayah yang sebelumnya relatif terisolasi. Melalui analisis sumber-sumber primer seperti laporan kolonial, jurnal kesehatan, dan surat kabar, artikel ini menelusuri bagaimana eksploitasi perkebunan skala besar yang dimungkinkan oleh stigma tersebut menyebabkan deforestasi, migrasi tenaga kerja yang tidak terkendali, dan buruknya sanitasi permukiman. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi antara degradasi lingkungan dan kondisi permukiman yang tidak memadai menciptakan ekosistem yang ideal bagi merebaknya epidemi penyakit tropis seperti malaria dan kolera, yang sebelumnya tidak berkembang secara luas di Banyuwangi. Ironisnya, pemerintah kolonial justru menyalahkan gaya hidup penduduk lokal dan para migran alih-alih mengakui dampak dari kebijakan mereka sendiri. Artikel ini juga mengungkap bahwa upaya perbaikan kondisi kesehatan dan penghapusan stigma pada akhir 1920-an, melalui penyediaan air bersih, pemberantasan tempat berkembang biaknya nyamuk, serta modernisasi fasilitas kesehatan, baru dilakukan setelah stigma tersebut berbalik merugikan dan mulai menghambat kepentingan ekonomi kolonial. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa krisis kesehatan di Banyuwangi merupakan produk langsung dari kebijakan eksploitatif yang berlandaskan stigma, yang menunjukkan keterkaitan erat antara narasi kolonial, kerusakan lingkungan, dan kesehatan masyarakat di wilayah pinggiran.
References
Aa, A. J. van der. 1857. Nederlands Oost-Indië, of Beschrijving Der Nederlandsche Bezittingen in Oost-Indië. Breda: Broese & Comp.
Algemeen Handelsblad. 1910. June 30, 1910.
Bataviaasch Nieuwsblad. 1914. “De Werkvolkkwestie in Banjoewangi.” April 14, 1914.
———. 1928. “Malaria En Bestuurszorg.” February 9, 1928.
Boomgaard, Peter. 1992. “Forest Management and Exploitation in Colonial Java, 1677–1897.” Forest & Conservation History 36, No.1: 4–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3983978.
———. 1999. “Oriental Nature, Its Friends and Its Enemies: Conservation of Nature in Late-Colonial Indonesia, 1889–1949.” Environment and History 5, no. 3: 257–292.
Breman, Jan. 2020. “Colonialism and Its Racial Imprint.” Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 35, No.3: 463–492. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26937814.
Broersma, D. R. 1913. Besoeki: Een Gewest in Opkomst. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema Boekhandel.
De Indische Courant. 1925. October 28, 1925.
———. 1927. “Door Den Oosthoek.” January 25, 1927.
———. 1933. “Banjoewangi.” March 22, 1933.
———. 1934. “Krikilan.” January 17, 1934.
———. 1935. “Waterleidingzaken.” December 12, 1935.
———. 1936. “D.V.G Nieuw Ziekenhuis.” February 26, 1936.
De Locomotief. 1896. “Brieven Uit denOosthoek.” January 8, 1896.
De Sumatra Post. 1912. October 14, 1912.
———. 1924. June 5, 1924.
De Waterstaatsingenieur. 1932. 12 (December 1932).
Departement van Economische Zaken. 1934. Volkstelling: Inheemsche Bevolking van Oost-Java (Census of 1930). Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.
Departement van Landbouw. 1926. Landbouw Atlas van Java En Madoera = Agricultural Atlas of Java and Madura. Weltevreden: Nijverheid en Handel.
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Het Nieuws van Den Dag. 1910. “Cholera in Den Oosthoek.” May 14, 1910.
Indisch Bijblad van Het Vaderland. 1912. April 22, 1912.
Indisch Genootschap. 1907. February 12, 1907.
Itawan, Devi. 2022. “Colonialism and Climate Crisis: The Root of Environmental Changes and the Rise of Environmental Awareness in Indonesia.” Indonesian Historical Studies 6, no. 2: 192–205. https://doi.org/10.14710/ihis.v6i2.16037.
Krediet, G. J. 1917. “Choleravaccinatie Te Batavia in 1914.” Geneeskundig Tijdschrift Voor Nederlandsch-Indië 57: 253–254.
Lith, P. A. van der. 1893. Nederlandsch Oost-Indië Beschreven En Afgebeeld Voor Het Nederlandsche Volk. Leiden: Brill.
Nawiyanto. 2000. The Economy of Besuki in the 1930s Depression. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
———. 2012. “Berakhirnya Frontir Pertanian: Kajian Historis Wilayah Besuki, 1870–1970.” Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 14, no.1: 77–98.
———. 2015. “Forest Resources Exploitation and Its Impact in the Extreme Salient of Java, 1870–1970.” TAWARIKH: International Journal for Historical Studies 6, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.2121/tawarikh.v6i2.590.
Parker, Richard, and Peter Aggleton. 2003. “HIV and AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination: A Conceptual Framework and Implications for Action.” Social Science & Medicine 57, No. 1: 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00304-0.
Phelan, Jo C., Bruce G. Link, and John F. Dovidio. 2008. “Stigma and Prejudice: One Animal or Two?” Social Science & Medicine 67, No. 3: 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.022.
Reinwardt, C. G. C. 1857. Reize Naar Het Oostelijk Gedeelte van Den Indischen Archipel. Amsterdam: Frederik Muller.
Schoute, D. 1935. “De Geneeskunde in Nederlandsch-Indië Gedurende de Negentiende Eeuw.” Geneeskundig Tijdschrift Voor Nederlandsch-Indië 75, No.5.
Shah, H. A., P. Huxley, J. Elmes, and K. A. Murray. 2019. “Agricultural Land-Uses Consistently Exacerbate Infectious Disease Risks in Southeast Asia.” Nature Communications 10, no. 1.
Soerabaiasch Handelsblad. 1907. “Op Reis.” December 6, 1907.
———. 1931. “Uit Zuid-Banjoewangi.” June 27, 1931.
———. 1932. “Banjoewangi.” February 12, 1932.
———. 1934. “Banjoewangi.” March 12, 1934.
———. 1936. “Jubileum Ziekenverpleging Krikilan.” December 1, 1936.
Tien Jaar Provincie Oost-Java 1929–1939. 1939.
Trenité, G. J. Nolst. 1920. Inleiding Tot de Agrarische Wetgeving van Het Rechtstreeks Bestuurd Gebied van Nederlandsch-Indië. Weltevreden: Landsdrukkerij.
Van Hemert, J. G. 1916. Rapport in Zake de Werkvolkkwestie in Banjoewangi. Weltevreden: N.V. Boekhandel Visser & Co.
Recommended Citation
Fathoni, Rifa'i S, Skriptyan N. Syuhri, Vini’matu Hikmah, and Ardhita Z. Namira. 2026. SHAPING DISEASE: COLONIAL STIGMA AND THE POLITICS OF HEALTH IN BANYUWANGI, THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya 16, no. 2 (August). 10.17510/paradigma.v16i2.1958.
Included in
Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Art and Design Commons, Fine Arts Commons, History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, Linguistics Commons, Philosophy Commons
