•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study discusses the interpretation of the importance of government versus community in the preservation and potential use of the Siak Sri Indrapura Cultural Heritage Area. Efforts for preservation in accordance with the law are not easy, since in practice various problems arise, especially those related to their use. The purpose of this study is to combine the interpretation of important values of government and society in the preservation of cultural heritage areas and their potential use by taking into account socio-cultural and economic values. This study was designed using a convergent qualitative and quantitative approach (convergent mixed methods approach), where data collected through qualitative and quantitative approaches are analyzed separately, then the results of the analysis are compared whether the findings of the data in the form of mutual information become normalized, or vice versa do not normalize each other. The result of study found the need for community participation in compiling significant values and the similarity between government interpretation and public perception in aspects of sosio-cultural and economic values.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas interpretasi pentingnya pemerintah versus masyarakat dalam pelestarian dan potensi pemanfaatan Kawasan Cagar Budaya Siak Sri Indrapura. Upaya pelestarian sesuai dengan hukum tidaklah mudah, karena dalam praktiknya berbagai masalah muncul, terutama yang berkaitan dengan penggunaannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menggabungkan interpretasi nilai-nilai penting pemerintah dan persepsi masyarakat dalam pelestarian kawasan cagar budaya dan potensi pemanfaatannya dengan memperhatikan nilai-nilai sosial budaya dan ekonomi. Penelitian ini dirancang dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif konvergen (convergent mixed methods approach), yaitu data yang dikumpulkan melalui pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif dianalisis secara terpisah, kemudian hasil analisis dibandingkan apakah temuan dari data tersebut berupa informasi timbal balik menjadi normalisasi, atau sebaliknya tidak saling menormalisasi. Hasil penelitian menemukan perlunya partisipasi masyarakat dalam menyusun nilai-nilai penting dan adanya kesamaan antara interpretasi pemerintah dan persepsi masyarakat dalam aspek nilai sosial budaya dan ekonomi.

References

Afkhami, Behrouz. 2017. Interpretive Approach to Applied Archaeology and Its Status in Iran. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 7, no. 1: 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2015-0029.

Aziz, Burhanudin dan Agi Ginanjar. 2019. Local Community Perceptions Toward World Heritage Inscription of Kota Tua Jakarta. Dalam Culture and International Law. Diedit oleh Hikmahanto Juwana, Jeffrey Thomas, Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli, dan Dhiana Puspitawati. London: CRC Press.

Berg, Sveinung K. 2018. Conditional Values of Urban Heritage: Context and Scale. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 8, no. 1:17‒29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-01-2016-0008.

Buonincontri, Piera, Alessandra Marasco dan Haywantee Ramkissoon. 2017. Visitors’ Experience, Place Attachment and Sustainable Behaviour at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 9, no. 7: 1‒19. MDPI Publication. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071112.

Clark, Kate. 2014. Values-Based Heritage Management and the Heritage Lottery Fund. APT Bulletin: Journal of Preservation Technology 45, no. 2/3: 65‒71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i23799514 (diakses pada 29 Januari 2020).

Creswell, John W. dan J. David Creswell. 2018. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Dumbraveanu, Daniela, Ana Craciun and Anca Tudoricu. 2016. Principles of Interpretation, Tourism, and Heritage Interpretation—the Experience of Romanian Museums. Human Geographies - Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 10, no 1: 59–75. https://humangeographies.org.ro/articles/101/a_101_4_dumbraveanu.pdf (diakses pada 28 November 2017).

Hodder, Ian. 1991. Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 56, no. 1: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/280968.

Howard, Peter. 2003. Heritage Management, Interpretation, Identity. London: MPG Books Ltd, Cornwall.

Huq, Ferdous Farhana, Rabeya Akter, Roxana Hafiz, Abdullah Al Mamun, dan Mashrekur Rahman. 2017. Conservation Planning of Built Heritages of Old Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 7, no. 3, 244–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2014-0030.

Jigyasu, Rohit. 2016. Reducing Disaster Risks to Urban Cultural Heritage: Global Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Heritage Management 1, no. 1: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455929616649476 (diakses pada 29 Januari 2020).

Karlström, Anna. 2013. Local Heritage and the Problem with Conservation. In Transcending the Culture–Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage: Views from the Asia–Pacific Region. Diedit oleh Sally Brockwell, Sue O‘Connor, dan Denis Byrne, 36: 141–56. ANU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hgz2n.14.

Lwoga, Noel Biseko. 2017. Local collaboration network in management of built heritage: A study of Pangani Conservation Task Force (PCTF) in Tanzania. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 7, no. 3: 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2016-0034.

Mason, Randall. 2002. Assesing Values in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.

Pratiwi, Ni Putu Galih dan Agi Ginanjar. 2022. Nilai Penting Cagar Budaya dan Disonansi Stakeholder dalam Pelestarian Bangunan Daerah Swatantra Tingkat 1 Lampung. Proceeding-INUSHARTS. https://inusharts.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Final-Proceeding-INUSHARTS-%202021Reduced.pdf. (diakses pada 20 Oktober 2022).

Rahmawati, Yuni dan Agi Ginanjar. 2019. Interpretation And Conflict in Conservation of Private Property Cultural Heritage in Indonesia. Dalam Culture and International Law. Diedit oleh Hikmahanto Juwana, Jeffrey Thomas, Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli, dan Dhiana Puspitawati. London: CRC Press.

Ramelan, Wiwin Djuwita, Supratikno Rahardjo, Karina Arifin, Myrna Laksman-Huntley, Ingrid H.E. Pojoh, dan Agi Ginanjar. 2015. Model Pemanfaatan Kawasan Cagar Budaya Trowulan Berbasis Masyarakat.AMERTA 33, no. 1: 63–76. https://ejournal.brin.go.id/amerta/article/view/3267 (diakses pada 29 Januari 2020).

Roy, Debopam dan Satyanarayana N. Kalidindi. 2017. Critical challenges in management of heritage conservation projects in India. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 7 , no. 3: 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2017-0012.

Tanjung, Mira Hafizhah. 2018. Kajian Zonasi Kawasan Cagar Budaya di Kecamatan Siak Kabupaten Siak. Plano Madani: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota 7, no. 1: 46–58. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpm.v7i1.4553.

Tilden, Freeman. 1977. Interpreting Our Heritage. Edisi ke-3. United State of America: The University of North Carolina Press.

Tilkin, Guy, ed. 2013. In Herit. Professional Development in Heritage Interpretation Manual. Belgia: Landcommanderij Alden Biesen.

Wells, Jeremy C. dan Lucas Lixinski. 2016. Heritage Values and Legal Rules: Identification and Treatment of the Historic Environment via an Adaptive Regulatory Framework (Part 1). Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 7, no. 3: 345‒364. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2016-0044.

Wilaela. 2018. Pemanfaatan Peninggalan Sejarah di Riau Menuju Daerah Ekoeduwisata. Sosial Budaya 15, no. 1: 43‒58. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sb.v15i1.5738.

Download

Share

COinS