Abstract
Sustainable development is a colossal narrative of state elites to institutionalize the right to development which, instead of being oriented towards harmonization of development efforts with efforts to protect the environment, is actually based on human interests. The inherent causality of this effort has an impact on systemic environmental damage in various countries. When the environment is no longer able to recover itself according to the timeline of meeting the needs of human civilization, an ambitious approach such as ecocentrism needs to be used as a counter-narrative to the anthropocentrism approach which tends to be relative: it looks useful, but in fact it is not. This study argues that sustainable development no longer shows its relevance when the earth's situation has entered a crisis stage: the environment is no longer able to keep up with the destructive demands of human fulfillment and continues to increase at an accelerating pace. Furthermore, the focus of this research is thus to question the relevance of sustainable development which was sparked by an a priori narrative, namely a narrative centered on the presupposition that environmental protection is aimed at fulfilling the interests of the development of human civilization. In the condition of the earth that has experienced the current crisis, setting standards that are higher than the status quo for mitigating and adapting to climate change may still be lacking in preventing crises on earth. Reflecting on the above, this research seeks to offer a new paradigm in transforming an ecocentric approach by reflecting on state practices that are recognized at the international level. With this paradigm transformation, the anthropocentric approach can be overhauled in order to accommodate the current earth crisis situation.
Bahasa Abstract
Pembangunan berkelanjutan merupakan narasi kolosal para elite negara untuk menginstitusionalisasikan hak atas pembangunan (right to development) yang, alih-alih berorientasi pada harmonisasi upaya pembangunan dengan upaya pelindungan lingkungan hidup, justru didasarkan pada kepentingan manusia. Kausalitas yang tercipta secara inheren dari upaya ini berdampak pada kerusakan lingkungan yang sistemis di berbagai negara. Kala lingkungan tidak lagi dapat memulihkan dirinya sesuai dengan lini masa pemenuhan kebutuhan peradaban manusia, pendekatan yang ambisius seperti ekosentrisme perlu dijadikan sebagai kontranarasi terhadap pendekatan antroposentrisme yang cenderung nisbi: terlihat bermanfaat, tetapi nyatanya tidak. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa pembangunan berkelanjutan tidak lagi memperlihatkan relevansinya di kala situasi bumi telah memasuki tahap krisis: lingkungan hidup tidak lagi mungkin untuk mengikuti permintaan pemenuhan manusia yang destruktif dan terus meningkat pada laju yang akseleratif. Lebih lanjut, fokus penelitian ini dengan demikian adalah untuk mempertanyakan relevansi pembangunan berkelanjutan yang dicetuskan dengan narasi apriori, yakni narasi yang berpusat pada praanggapan bahwa perlindungan lingkungan hidup ditujukan untuk pemenuhan kepentingan pembangunan peradaban manusia. Dalam kondisi bumi yang telah mengalami krisis saat ini, penetapan standar yang lebih tinggi dari status quo untuk melakukan mitigasi dan adaptasi perubahan iklim mungkin masih kurang dalam mencegah krisis di bumi. Berkaca pada hal di atas, penelitian ini hendak menawarkan paradigma baru dalam mentransformasikan pendekatan ekosentris dengan berkaca pada praktik kenegaraan (state practices) yang diakui di level internasional. Dengan adanya transformasi paradigma ini, pendekatan antroposentris dapat dirombak demi mengakomodasi situasi krisis bumi saat ini.
References
Buku
Beyerlin, Ulrich dan Thilo Marauhn. International environmental law. München: Beck, Nomos, 2011.
Brierly, J. The Law of Nations. Ed. 6. 1963.
Finer, Herman. The Theory and Practice of Modern Government. Ed. Revisi. New York: Henry Holt, 1949.
Gehring, Thomas. Dynamic International Regimes: Institutions for International Environmental Governance. Berlin: Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1994.
Giddens, Anthony. Politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
Hughes, Barry B. Continuity and Change in World Politics: The Clash of Perspectives. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1991.
Kramer, Ludwig. E.C. Treaty and Environmental Law. Ed. II. Sweet & Maxwell, 1995.
jær, Anne Mette. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press 2004.
MacAndrews, Colin. "Politics of the Environment in Indonesia," Asian Survey 34, no. 4 (1994): 369-380.
Peters, Anne. ‘Global Constitutionalism in a Nutshell’ dalam Klaus Dicke et al (eds). Weltinnenrecht: Liber amicorum Jost Delbrück. Duncker & Humblot, 2005.
Artikel Jurnal
Barral, Virginie. "Sustainable development in international law: nature and operation of an evolutive legal norm." European Journal of International Law 23, no. 2 (2012): 377-400.
Bedner, Adriaan. "Amalgamating environmental law in Indonesia." FOR DEVELOPMENT (2008).
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. "The climate of history: Four theses." Critical inquiry 35, no. 2 (2009): 197-222.
Domanska, Ewa. "Beyond anthropocentrism in historical studies." Historein 10 (2010): 118-130.
Kotzé, Louis J. "Rethinking global environmental law and governance in the Anthropocene." Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 32, no. 2 (2014): 121-156.
Lindsey, Tim dan Mas Achmad Santosa. "The trajectory of law reform in Indonesia: A short overview of legal systems and change in Indonesia." Dalam Tim Lindsey (ed.), Indonesia: law and society, Ed. II. Singapura: The Federation Press, 2008.
McAdam, Jane. "Historical cross-border relocations in the Pacific: lessons for planned relocations in the context of climate change." The Journal of Pacific History 49, no. 3 (2014): 301-327.
Mirza, M. Monirul Qader. "Climate change and extreme weather events: can developing countries adapt?." Climate policy 3, no. 3(2003): 233-248.
Nunn, Patrick D., William Aalbersberg, Shalini Lata, dan Marion Gwilliam. "Beyond the core: community governance for climate-change adaptation in peripheral parts of Pacific Island Countries." Regional Environmental Change 14, no. 1(2014): 221-235.
Phelan, Liam, Ann Henderson-Sellers, dan Ros Taplin. "The political economy of addressing the climate crisis in the Earth system: undermining perverse resilience." New Political Economy 18, no. 2 (2013): 198-226.
Robinson, Nicholas A. "Beyond sustainability: Environmental management for the Anthropocene epoch." Journal of Public Affairs 12, no. 3 (2012): 181-194.
Rosegrant, Mark W., Madan Mohan Dey, Rowena Valmonte-Santos, dan Oai Li Chen. "Economic impacts of climate change and climate change adaptation strategies in Vanuatu and Timor-Leste." Marine Policy 67 (2016): 179-188.
Santosa, Mas Achmad dan Margaretha Quina. "Gerakan Pembaruan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia dan Perwujudan Tata Kelola Lingkungan yang Baik dalam Negara Demokrasi." Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2014).
Steffen, Will, Paul J. Crutzen, dan John R. McNeill. "The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature." AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36, no. 8 (2007): 614-621.
The Global Environmental Change Programmes. "Earth system science: An integrated approach." Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 43, no. 8 (2001): 21-27.
Tisdell, Clem. "Sustainable development: differing perspectives of ecologists and economists, and relevance to LDCs." World development 16, no. 3 (1988): 373-384.
Webster, Emily, dan Laura Mai. "Transnational environmental law in the Anthropocene." Transnational Legal Theory 11, no. 1-2(2020): 1-15.
Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. "Pembangunan berkelanjutan: status hukum dan pemaknaannya." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 43, no. 1 (2017): 54-90.
Widyaningsih, Grita Anindarini dan Raynaldo Sembiring. "Environmental Protection in Indonesia after the Job Creation Law 2020." Chinese Journal of Environmental Law 5, no. 1 (2021).
Makalah
Richardson, Benjamin J. "A damp squib: Environmental law from a human evolutionary perspective." Osgoode CLPE Research Paper 08 (2011).
Seck, Sara. "Business, Human Rights, & the Triple Planetary Crisis: Confronting Overconsumption." Makalah disampaikan pada kegiatan UConn Business & Human Rights Workshop (Maret 2022).
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. UUD NRI 1945.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2009 Nomor 140. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5059.
Kasus/Putusan Pengadilan
International Court of Justice. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1997.
Dokumen Internasional
World Commission on Environment and Development. "Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future", UN. Doc. A/42/427 (Aug. 4, 1987).
Recommended Citation
Ifdal, Abdurrahman Al-Fatih
(2022)
"Kerangka Praktik Kenegaraan dalam Narasi Apriori Pembangunan Berkelanjutan sebagai Hak Konstitusional: Sentralisasi Pendekatan Ekosentris dalam Melawan Kenisbian Utilitas Pendekatan Antroposentris,"
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi: Vol. 2:
No.
2, Article 1.
DOI: 10.7454/JKD.v2i2.1206
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jurnalkonsdem/vol2/iss2/1