Menguak Status dan Legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai Legal Tender (Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat)
Abstract
Digital technology and modern telecommunications have been and will continue to be key factors in the emergence of various innovative products. One such innovative product is digital currency, specifically Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). In Indonesia, advancements in digital technology and telecommunications have encouraged the government to issue a CBDC, which will be named Digital Rupiah. The initiative to issue Digital Rupiah also responds to global trends and the public's need for secure, efficient, and sustainable payment instruments.
However, the plan to issue Digital Rupiah is not without challenges, particularly regarding the clarity of its legal status as a lawful means of payment or legal tender. Using a normative legal research method, this study finds that Article 23B of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) does not explicitly regulate the types of digital currency. There exists a *rechtsvacuum* (legal void) concerning the legal tender status of Digital Rupiah at the constitutional level. Additionally, from a technical-juridical perspective, concrete legal regulations regarding the status and legal tender legality of Digital Rupiah, in parity with paper and coin Rupiah, remain insufficiently comprehensive. Such legal conditions have the potential to create ambiguity and uncertainty. Nevertheless, this study identifies the emergence of a new law in the form of an omnibus law, which serves as a supporting framework for the solidity of the legal structure as well as a source of clarity on the meaning, status, and legality of Digital Rupiah. The clarity of such a legal framework is essential to solidify the innovation in the issuance and use of Digital Rupiah in the digital era. The legal framework for Digital Rupiah will support payment system efficiency, promote financial inclusion, and contribute to sustainable national economic growth. The legal theory guiding the research findings, which emphasizes the comprehensive regulation of CBDC, is the Dignified Justice Theory. According to this theory, while the need for legal comparison is unavoidable, Pancasila must remain the ultimate source of all legal principles governing the existence of Digital Rupiah.
Bahasa Abstract
Teknologi digital dan telekomunikasi modern telah dan akan terus menjadi faktor kemunculan berbagai macam produk inovatif. Satu di antara produk inovatif itu adalah mata uang digital (Central Bank Digital Currency/CBDC). Di Indonesia kemajuan teknologi digital dan telekomunikasi mendorong pemerintah menerbitkan CBDC yang akan dinamakan Rupiah Digital. Inisiatif penerbitan Rupiah Digital juga untuk merespons tren global dan kebutuhan masyarakat akan instrumen pembayaran yang aman dan efisien serta berkelanjutan. Namun, rencana penerbitan Rupiah Digital bukan tanpa masalah. Utamanya, permasalahan terkait kejelasan status legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai alat pembayaran yang sah atau legal tender. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa benar Pasal 23B UUD NRI 1945 belum tegas mengatur tentang macam mata uang digital. Ada rechtsvacuum dari status legal tender Rupiah Digital di aras konstitusi. Selain secara teknis yuridis belum terlalu komprehensif peraturan hukum konkret mengenai status dan legalitas legal tender dari Rupiah Digital dalam kesetaraannya dengan Rupiah Kertas dan Logam. Kondisi hukum demikian berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakjelasan dan ketidakpastian. Namun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ada hukum baru berbentuk undang-undang omnibus, kerangka penopang bagi soliditas struktur hukum serta sumber kejelasan makna dan kepastian status serta legalitas dari Rupiah Digital. Kejelasan kerangka pengaturan hukum yang demikian itu dibutuhkan untuk mengukuhkan inovasi penerbitan dan penggunaan Rupiah Digital di era digital. Kerangka hukum Rupiah Digital bakal mendukung efisiensi sistem pembayaran, mendorong inklusi keuangan, dan berkontribusi pada pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional secara berkelanjutan. Teori hukum yang menavigasi temuan penelitian yang menghargai kerangka pengaturan hukum CBDC secara komprehensif tersebut adalah teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Dengan teori Keadilan Bermartabat, sekalipun tidak terhindarkan adanya kebutuhan perbandingan hukum, Pancasila tetap harus menjadi sumber segala sumber hukum keberadaan Rupiah Digital.
References
Artikel jurnal
Allen JG. Property in Digital Coins. European Property Law Journal. 2019 May 13;8:64– 1;
As-Salafiyah A, Rusydiana AS, Ihsanul Ikhwan. Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): A Sentiment Analysis And Legal Perspective. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions. 2023 May 31;2(2):347–72;
Digital Currency, BIS Papers No. 101, January 2019, p. 12.
Kameo J, and Prasetyo T. Pancasila as the First and Foremost Source of Laws: A Dignified Justice Philosophy. J Legal Ethical & Regul Isses. 2021;24:1;
Santoso WY, Putra AA, Susanti L, Rahman F. Design Elements and Risks of Central Bank Digital Currency in Tailoring a Prudent ‘Rupiah Digital’ Design Elements and Risks of Central Bank Digital Currency in Tailoring a Prudent ‘Rupiah Digital’ 1* [Internet]. Vol. 08, Diponegoro Law Review. 2023. Available from: https://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/2144;
Buku
Andrew Lang and Diane Skapinker. (1987). Drafting for Inflation, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney.
Barontini, C., and Holden, H., Proceeding with Caution-a Survey on Central Bank
Bossu W, Itatani M, Margulis C, Rossi A, Weenink H, Yoshinaga A. Legal Aspects of Central
Charles Practor. (1939, 2012). Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money, Seventh Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke-13, Kencana, Jakarta
Soerjono Soekanto. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cetakan ke-18, Depok.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2000). Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Liberty, Yogyakarta, h., 14.
Teguh Prasetyo. (2015). Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Ceetkan I, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2015
Teguh Prasetyo. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Cetakan I, Nusa Media, Bandung, h., 3. Bdnk.,
Teguh Prasetyo. (2020). Hukum dan Teori Hukum Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Cetakan I, Nusa Media, Bandung
Teguh Prasetyo. (2022). Hukum dan Keadilan Bermartabat: Orientasi Pemikiran Filsafat, Teori dan Praktek Hukum, Cetkan I, K-Media, Yogyakarta.
Wouter Bossu, et. al. (2020). IMF Working Paper No. WP/20/254 on Legal Aspects of Central Bank
Internet
Bank Digital Currency: Central Bank and Monetary Law Considerations, WP/20/254, November 2020;
Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia, Public Consultation Report, Project Garuda, Wholesale Rupiah Digital Cash Ledger, 2023;
Digital Currency: Central Bank and Monetary Law Considerations, International Monetary Fund, p.4;
Thamrin No JM. Proyek Garuda: Menavigasi Arsitektur Digital Rupiah BANK INDONESIA [Internet]. 2022. Available from: www.bi.go.id.
Recommended Citation
Kameo, Jeferson
(2025)
"Menguak Status dan Legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai Legal Tender (Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat),"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 55:
No.
3, Article 10.
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol55/iss3/10
Revised article
decision (5).doc (100 kB)
Statement Form Revisi
Status dan Legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai Legal Tender (1).pdf (391 kB)
Artikel Hasil Revisi JHP_2025_1804_E.docx (57 kB)
Isian Form Revisi JHP FH-UI.doc (100 kB)
Response to decision.doc (40 kB)