DOI
https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol55.no.3.1804
Abstract
Digital technology and modern telecommunications have been and will continue to be key factors in the emergence of various innovative products. One such innovative product is digital currency, specifically Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). In Indonesia, advancements in digital technology and telecommunications have encouraged the government to issue a CBDC, which will be named Digital Rupiah. The initiative to issue Digital Rupiah also responds to global trends and the public's need for secure, efficient, and sustainable payment instruments.
However, the plan to issue Digital Rupiah is not without challenges, particularly regarding the clarity of its legal status as a lawful means of payment or legal tender. Using a normative legal research method, this study finds that Article 23B of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) does not explicitly regulate the types of digital currency. There exists a *rechtsvacuum* (legal void) concerning the legal tender status of Digital Rupiah at the constitutional level. Additionally, from a technical-juridical perspective, concrete legal regulations regarding the status and legal tender legality of Digital Rupiah, in parity with paper and coin Rupiah, remain insufficiently comprehensive. Such legal conditions have the potential to create ambiguity and uncertainty. Nevertheless, this study identifies the emergence of a new law in the form of an omnibus law, which serves as a supporting framework for the solidity of the legal structure as well as a source of clarity on the meaning, status, and legality of Digital Rupiah. The clarity of such a legal framework is essential to solidify the innovation in the issuance and use of Digital Rupiah in the digital era. The legal framework for Digital Rupiah will support payment system efficiency, promote financial inclusion, and contribute to sustainable national economic growth. The legal theory guiding the research findings, which emphasizes the comprehensive regulation of CBDC, is the Dignified Justice Theory. According to this theory, while the need for legal comparison is unavoidable, Pancasila must remain the ultimate source of all legal principles governing the existence of Digital Rupiah.
Bahasa Abstract
Teknologi digital dan telekomunikasi modern telah dan akan terus menjadi faktor kemunculan berbagai macam produk inovatif. Satu di antara produk inovatif itu adalah mata uang digital (Central Bank Digital Currency/CBDC). Di Indonesia kemajuan teknologi digital dan telekomunikasi mendorong pemerintah menerbitkan CBDC yang akan dinamakan Rupiah Digital. Inisiatif penerbitan Rupiah Digital juga untuk merespons tren global dan kebutuhan masyarakat akan instrumen pembayaran yang aman dan efisien serta berkelanjutan. Namun, rencana penerbitan Rupiah Digital bukan tanpa masalah. Utamanya, permasalahan terkait kejelasan status legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai alat pembayaran yang sah atau legal tender. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa benar Pasal 23B UUD NRI 1945 belum tegas mengatur tentang macam mata uang digital. Ada rechtsvacuum dari status legal tender Rupiah Digital di aras konstitusi. Selain secara teknis yuridis belum terlalu komprehensif peraturan hukum konkret mengenai status dan legalitas legal tender dari Rupiah Digital dalam kesetaraannya dengan Rupiah Kertas dan Logam. Kondisi hukum demikian berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakjelasan dan ketidakpastian. Namun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ada hukum baru berbentuk undang-undang omnibus, kerangka penopang bagi soliditas struktur hukum serta sumber kejelasan makna dan kepastian status serta legalitas dari Rupiah Digital. Kejelasan kerangka pengaturan hukum yang demikian itu dibutuhkan untuk mengukuhkan inovasi penerbitan dan penggunaan Rupiah Digital di era digital. Kerangka hukum Rupiah Digital bakal mendukung efisiensi sistem pembayaran, mendorong inklusi keuangan, dan berkontribusi pada pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional secara berkelanjutan. Teori hukum yang menavigasi temuan penelitian yang menghargai kerangka pengaturan hukum CBDC secara komprehensif tersebut adalah teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Dengan teori Keadilan Bermartabat, sekalipun tidak terhindarkan adanya kebutuhan perbandingan hukum, Pancasila tetap harus menjadi sumber segala sumber hukum keberadaan Rupiah Digital.
References
Artikel jurnal
Adrian, Tobias dan Tommaso Mancini Griffoli. “The Rise of Digital Money.” FinTech Notes 2019. Issue 001 (2026). Hal. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498324908.063.
Allen, Jason Grant. “Property in digital coins.” European Property Law Journal 8. Issue 1 (2019). Hlm. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2019-0005.
Anggraeni, Eliza Sri. Et al. “Perkembangan Uang Digital di Indonesia,” Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Accounting 1, No. 3 (2023). Hlm., 132-148. https://doi.org/10.54783/jemba.v1i3.62.
Arias, Renato. “Regulating CBDCs: A Comparative Analysis of Challenges and Strategies.” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 1564 LNNS, (2026), hlm. 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04581-2_30
Barontini, Christian dan Henry Holden. “Proceeding with Caution-a Survey on Central Bank Digital Currency.” Bank for International Settlements. No. 101, 2019.
Cheng, Pangyue. “Decoding the rise of Central Bank Digital Currency in China: designs, problems, and prospects.” Journal of Banking Regulation 24. No. 2 (2022). Hlm. 156-170. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00193-5
Handayani, Fitri dan Fatma Yuliana. “Design and Legal Aspect of Central Bank Digital Currency: A Literature Review.” Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions 1. No. 3 (2022). Hlm. 509-536. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i3.35.
Kameo, Jeferson and Teguh Prasetyo. “Pancasila as the First and Foremost Source of Laws: A Dignified Justice Philosophy.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24. Special Issue 1 (2021). Hlm. 3-8.
Lamberty, Ricky. Et. al. "HybCBDC: A Design for Central Bank Digital Currency Systems Enabling Digital Cash." IEEE 12 (2024), hlm. 137712-137728. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3458451.
Lee, David Kuo Chuen, Li Yan, dan Yu Wang. “A global perspective on central bank digital currency”. China Economic Journal 14, No. 1 (2021). Hlm. 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2020.1870279.
Muhammad, Rafli Fadilah dan Rianda Dirkareshza. “Legalitas Penerapan Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, No. 3 (2023). Hlm. 913-930. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7370.
Nabilou, Hossein. “Central Bank Digital Currencies: Preliminary Legal Observations”. SSRN Electronic Journal 7, No. 24 (2019). Hlm.1-30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3329993
Purnawan, Muhammad Edhie dan Retno Riyanti, “Significant Effect of the Central Bank Digital Currency on the Design of Monetary Policy.” Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia 8, No. 1 (2019). Hlm. 125-151. https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v8i1.15.
As-Salafiyah, Aisyah, Aam Slamet Rusydiana, dan Ihsanul Ikhwan. “Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): A Sentiment Analysis and Legal Perspective.” Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions 2, No. 2 (2023). Hlm. 347-372. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v2i2.177
Santoso, Wahyu Yun, et al. “Design Elements and Risks of Central Bank Digital Currency in Tailoring a Prudent ‘Rupiah Digital.” Diponegoro Law Review 8, No. 2 (2023). Hlm. 141-158. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.8.2.2023.141-158
Vanani, Alvin Baharudin dan Dedi Suselo, “Analisis Legal Tender Uang Digital Bank Sentral Indonesia”. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi 6. No. 3 (2021). Hlm.74-83. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v6i3.16225.
Zams, Bastian Muzbar. Et al. “Designing Central Bank Digital Currency for Indonesia: The Delphi–Analytic Network Process.” Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking 23, No. 3 (2020). Hlm. 413-440. https://doi.org/10.21098/BEMP.V23I3.1351.
Buku
Lang, Andrew G. and Diane Skapinker. Drafting for Inflation. Sydney: CCH Australia Limited, 1987.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Cet. 13. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Ed. 2. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Cet. 18. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2018.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat: Perspektif Teori Hukum, Bandung: Nusa Media, Cetakan I, 2015.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Penelitian Hukum Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Cet. 1. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum dan Teori Hukum Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Bandung: Nusa Media, Cetakan I, 2020.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum dan Keadilan Bermartabat: Orientasi Pemikiran Filsafat, Teori dan Praktek Hukum, Yogyakarta: K-Media, Cetakan I, 2022.
Proctor, Charles. Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money. Cet. 7th. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939, 2012.
Internet
Auer, Raphael, Giulio Cornelli, dan Jon Frost. “Rise of the Central Bank Digital Currencies: Drivers, Approaches and Technologies.” Social Science Research Network. No. DP15363 (2020). Hlm. 1-44. Diakses 12 Maret 2026.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3723552#paper-citations-widget.
Bossu, Wouter. Masaru Itatani, dan Arthur D. P. Rossi. “Legal Aspects of Central Bank Digital Currency: Central Bank and Monetary Law Considerations”, IMF Working Papers 2020 Issue 254 (2020). Hlm. 1-51. diakses pada tanggal 12/3/2026. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561622.001.
Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia. Public Consultation Report, Project Garuda, Wholesale Rupiah Digital Cash Ledger. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia, 2023. Hlm. 1-33. https://www.bi.go.id/en/rupiah/digital-rupiah/Documents/Garuda-Project-Public-Consultation-Report.pdf. Diakses 12 Maret 2026.
Bank Indonesia. Proyek Garuda: Menavigasi Arsitektur Digital Rupiah. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia, 2022. https://www.bi.go.id/id/rupiah/digital-rupiah/Documents/White_Paper_CBDC-2022.pdf, (2022). Diakses 12 Maret 2026.
Nazhari, Akhmad Farhan dan Paripurna Poerwoko Sugarda. “Tinjauan Penerapan dan Pengaturan Central Bank Digital Currency di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi dengan CBDC Cina "E-CNY").” Skripsi Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yoryakarta, 2023. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/225614.
Nizar, Muhammad Afdi. “Kontroversi Mata Uang Digital.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive. hlm. 1-22, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97940/. Diakses 3 Maret 2026.
Recommended Citation
Setjoatmadja, Sylvia and Kameo, Jeferson
(2025)
"Menguak Status dan Legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai Legal Tender (Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat),"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 55:
No.
3, Article 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol55.no.3.1804
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol55/iss3/10
Revised article
decision (5).doc (100 kB)
Statement Form Revisi
Status dan Legalitas Rupiah Digital sebagai Legal Tender (1).pdf (391 kB)
Artikel Hasil Revisi JHP_2025_1804_E.docx (57 kB)
Isian Form Revisi JHP FH-UI.doc (100 kB)
Response to decision.doc (40 kB)
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Air and Space Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Election Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons