DOI
10.21143/jhp.vol54.no4.1683
Abstract
Meaningful public participation in the legislative process in Indonesia is a fundamental element in fostering an inclusive and transparent democracy. Despite the legal mandate for public involvement, as outlined in Law No. 13 of 2022 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 82/PUU-XXI/2023, such participation often remains formalistic and limited in practice. This article highlights the potential of digital technology, particularly the concept of CrowdLaw, as an alternative approach to enhancing public engagement. Case studies from Estonia, Iceland, and Brazil demonstrate that digital participation can effectively increase public involvement and improve the quality of legislative outcomes. With sufficient infrastructure and improved digital literacy, Indonesia is well-positioned to harness technology to create a more inclusive legislative process. However, challenges such as unequal access to technology and low levels of digital literacy across much of the population hinder this effort. Therefore, this article recommends strengthening public participation at all stages of the legislative process, implementing policies that support the sustainable adoption of CrowdLaw, enhancing digital infrastructure, developing user-friendly participation platforms, and expanding digital literacy education to ensure more equitable and substantive public engagement in legislative processes
Bahasa Abstract
Partisipasi masyarakat yang bermakna dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia merupakan komponen utama dalam menciptakan demokrasi yang inklusif dan transparan. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 82/PUU-XXI/2023, partisipasi publik telah diwajibkan, namun dalam praktiknya sering kali masih bersifat formalitas dan terbatas. Artikel ini menyoroti potensi teknologi digital melalui konsep CrowdLaw sebagai alternatif untuk memperkuat partisipasi masyarakat. Studi di negara-negara seperti Estonia, Islandia, dan Brasil membuktikan bahwa partisipasi digital dapat meningkatkan keterlibatan publik secara efektif, sekaligus memperbaiki kualitas produk hukum. Dengan infrastruktur yang memadai dan peningkatan literasi digital, Indonesia diharapkan mampu memanfaatkan teknologi guna menciptakan proses legislasi yang lebih inklusif. Tantangan yang diidentifikasi dalam implementasi partisipasi digital di Indonesia mencakup kesenjangan akses teknologi dan rendahnya literasi digital di sebagian besar masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam seluruh tahap pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, merancang kebijakan yang mendukung CrowdLaw secara berkelanjutan, peningkatan infrastruktur digital, pengembangan platform partisipasi yang ramah pengguna, serta edukasi literasi digital yang luas, agar partisipasi publik dalam legislasi menjadi lebih merata dan substansial.
References
Artikel jurnal
Alsina Burgués, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the CrowdLaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik. 2018; 40 (2): 337-58, 2018.
Arnstein, Sherry R. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, no. 4 (1969): 216–24.
———. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 85, no. 1 (2019): 24–34.
Bernardes, Marciele Berger, Francisco Pacheco de Andrade, and Paulo Novais. “Regulatory Modeling for the Enhancement of Democratic Processes in Smart Cities: A Study Based on CrowdLaw—Online Public Participation in Lawmaking.” In Proceedings of Fifth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2020, London, Volume 1, 545–53. Springer, 2021.
BPHN. “Naskah Akademik Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011” 01 (2022): 1–7. http://www.albayan.ae.
Conceição Rossini, Patricia Gonçalves da, and Vanessa Veiga De Oliveira. “E-Democracy and Collaborative Lawmaking: The Discussion of the Political Reform in Brazil.” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 21.
Fajri, M Nurul. “Legitimacy Of Public Participation In The Establishment Of Law In Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (2023): 123–43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2017.
Feddersen, Mayra, and Luis E Santana. “Unpacking the Democratic Affordances of CrowdLaw Concept and Practice:‘It Feels like Being Part of the Game.’” Politics 42, no. 3 (2022): 340–57.
Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan. “Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Perspektif Perbandingan 5 (Lima) Negara Demokratis: Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Perspektif Perbandingan 5 (Lima) Negara Demokratis.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 2 (2024): 203–25.
Gillespie, Marie, Nesrine Abdel Sattar, and Mina Lami. “Social Media and Political Participation:” Political (Dis)Engagement, no. April 2011 (2017): 77–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898w1.9.
Gylfason, Thorvaldur, and Anne Meuwese. “Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution.” In Digital Democracy in a Globalized World, 249–73. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.
Macintosh, Ann. “Using Information and Communication Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process,” 2004.
Maria One Oktavia. “Penguatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurist-Diction 5, no. 4 (2022): 1419–34. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i4.37337.
Martí, José Luis, and Beth Simone Noveck. “Introduction to the Special Issue on CrowdLaw and Emergency Collective Intelligence.” Digital Government: Research and Practice. ACM New York, NY, 2022.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Antinomi Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 3 (2015): 316. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n3.112.
Noveck, Beth Simone. “The Future of Citizen Participation in the Electronic State.” ISJLP 1 (2004): 1.
Organization, World Health. “Voice, Agency, Empowerment–Handbook on Social Participation for Universal Health Coverage,” 2021.
Parvin, Phil. “Democracy Without Participation: A New Politics for a Disengaged Era.” Res Publica 24, no. 1 (2018): 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1.
Plantinga, Paul, Nonkululeko Dlamini, and Tanja Gordon. “Implementing E-Participation in Africa: What Roles Can Public Officials Play?” ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies 2, no. 2 (2024): 1–23.
Prabowo, Hadi, Dadang Suwanda, and Wirman Syafri. “Inovasi Pelayanan Pada Organisasi Publik.” CV Remaja Rosdakarya, 2022.
Pratama, Nur Aji. “Meaningful Participation Sebagai Upaya Kompromi Idee Des Recht Pasca Putusan Mk No. 91/Puu-Xviii/2020.” Crepido 4, no. 2 (2022): 137–47. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.4.2.137-147.
Riskiyono, Joko. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan.” Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial 6, no. 2 (2015): 159–76.
Sánchez-Nielsen, Elena, and Francisco Chávez-Gutiérrez. “Using Semantic Annotations on Political Debate Videos for Building Open Government Based Lawmaking.” Expert Systems 38, no. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12748.
Soeprapto, R Wahjoe Poernomo. “Meaningful Participation Through Online Channels in Legislation Making in Indonesia via Dpr. Go. Id Page.” Trunojoyo Law Review 6, no. 2 (2024): 189–210.
Sterling, Theodor D. “Democracy in an Information Society.” The Information Society 4, no. 1–2 (1986): 9–47.
Sumantri, Ii. “Local Democracy and Community Participation: The Role of Information and Communication Technology.” Endless: International Journal of Future Studies 4, no. 2 (2021): 270–81. https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v4i2.155.
Swift, Clint S, and Kathryn VanderMolen. “Marginalization and Mobilization: The Roots of Female Legislators’ Collaborative Advantage in the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 21, no. 4 (2021): 355–79.
Valtysson, Bjarki. “Democracy in Disguise: The Use of Social Media in Reviewing the Icelandic Constitution.” Media, Culture & Society 36, no. 1 (2014): 52–68.
Vatsa, Vedang Ratan, and Parth Chhaparwal. “Estonia’s e-Governance and Digital Public Service Delivery Solutions.” In 2021 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT), 135–38. IEEE, 2021.
Velasquez, Alcides, and Andrea M. Quenette. “Facilitating Social Media and Offline Political Engagement During Electoral Cycles: Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Political Action Among Hispanics and Latinos.” Mass Communication and Society 21, no. 6 (2018): 763–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1484489.
Wardana, Dodi Jaya, Sukardi Sukardi, and Radian Salman. “Public Participation in the Law-Making Process in Indonesia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 30, no. 1 (2023): 66–77.
Wirtz, Bernd W., Peter Daiser, and Boris Binkowska. “E-Participation: A Strategic Framework.” International Journal of Public Administration 41, no. 1 (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1242620.
Wojcik, Stefan, and Shawnna Mullenax. “Men Idle, Women Network: How Networks Help Female Legislators Succeed.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42, no. 4 (2017): 579–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12169.
Xuyen, Nguyen Huu, Dang Minh Tuan, Nguyen Xuan Ha, and Tran Duc Can. “The Applying of Internet of Things (IOT) in Buiding e-Government of Estonia and Lessons for Vietnam.” European Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, no. 2 (2020): 14–20.
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. LN Tahun 2022 No. 243 TLN No. 6801.
Internet
Freedoom in The World. “Key Developments in 2022,”2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/indonesia/freedom-world/2023
Recommended Citation
Prasojo, Hermawan
(2025)
"Inovasi Kolaboratif Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Optimalisasi Teknologi Untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Publik Dalam Legislasi,"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 54:
No.
4, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol54.no4.1683
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol54/iss4/1
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Air and Space Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Election Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons
