DOI
10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2591
Abstract
Violations of law and code of ethics performed by the constitutional judge shows that there is abuse of power within the court. The existence of Board of Ethics has questioned due to these violation and accused for not being able to perform its function in maintaining the dignity of the court. This concludes that the optimization of the function of the Board of Ethics are necessary. This is a normative and doctrinal research with several approaches. This research explains that board of ethics needs several changes within its body, such as: 1) boarden the board’s authority from investigating reports and allegations of violation, to performing fact-findings and tracing the indications of violation; 2) adding staffs to support the board; and 3) regulating the board and the structure under The Law on Mahkamah Konstitusi.
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Format Kelembagaan Negara dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan dalam UUD 1945, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2005.
Falaakh, Mohammad Fajrul. Konsisten Mengawal Konstitusi, Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, 2014.
Suharizal. Reformasi Konstitusi 1998 - 2002; Pergulatan Konsep dan Pemikiran Amandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.
Marzuki, Suparman. Imparsialitas Hakim, Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2014).
Chaidir, Ellydar dan Suparto, “Perlunya Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik dan Prilaku Hakim Konstitusi dalam rangka menjaga Martabat dan Kehormatannya” Jurnal UIR Law Review Volume 01 Nomor 02, 2017.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. “Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Dalam sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar RI 1945”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 Mei, 2012.
Wiryanto. “Penguatan Dewan Etik dalam Menjaga Keluhuran Martabat Hakim Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 13, Nomor 4, 2016.
Internet Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, “Akil Terima Rp 2 Miliar?”,https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/berita-sub/1655-akil-terima-rp-2-miliar?tmpl=component&format=pdf, diakses tanggal 12 April 2018.
Kompas. "Mantan Ketua MK Akil Mochtar Divonis Seumur Hidup",https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/06/30/2203501/Mantan.Ketua.MK.Akil.Mochtar.Divonis.Seumur.Hidup, diakses tanggal 12 April 2018.
Kompas. "Sejak Menjabat Ketua MK, Arief Hidayat 6 Kali Dilaporkan ke Dewan Etik", https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/02/21/19185521/sejak-menjabatketua-mk-arief-hidayat-6-kali-dilaporkan-ke-dewan-etik?page=all. Diakses 12 Maret 2019.
Tempo. “Alasan Dewan Etik MK Tak Tindaklanjuti Laporan Soal Arief Hidayat”, https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1067377/alasan-dewan-etik-meka-taktindaklanjuti-laporan-soal-arief-hidayat diakses tanggal 10 April 2018
Recommended Citation
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman; Hanapi, Rizqa Ananda; and Hidayat, Taufik
(2020)
"OPTIMALISASI FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DEWAN ETIK MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI,"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 50:
No.
3, Article 10.
DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2591
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol50/iss3/10
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons