•  
  •  
 

DOI

10.21143/jhp.vol.48.no.1.1593

Abstract

Government regulation in lieu of law or ‘Perppu’arrangement in Indonesia is more limited than other types of emergency regulations issued by the president in various countries. Such arrangement apprently is not sufficient to be considered as limiting the issuance of the emergency regulations. Some presidential state countries have made changes to provide sufficient restrictions to presidential legislative power. The limitation is not only in terms of its formation procedures but also on the material which can be regulated by the Perppu. Therefore, lessons from other jurisdictionsindeed inspires Indonesia to limit the pasage of Perppu

Bahasa Abstract

Pengaturan Perppu di Indonesia dapat dikategorikan cukup terbatas jika dibandingkan pengaturan terhadap peraturan darurat yang diterbitkan presiden di berbagai negara. Pengaturan yang ada belum dapat dianggap memberi batasan bagi penerbitan peraturan darurat tersebut. Beberapa negara bersistem presidensial telah melakukan perubahan terhadap konstitusinya demi mendapatkan pengaturan yang memberikan batasan yang cukup memadai terhadap penggunaan kekuasaan presiden di bidang legislatif ini (president’s legislative power). Pembatasan tersebut bukan saja dari segi prosedur pembentukannya namun juga pembatasan terhadap materi yang dapat diatur oleh perppu. Pelajaran dari beberapa negara tersebut dapat menginspirasi sebuah gagasan pembatasan perppu di Indonesia.

References

Buku, Jurnal dan Karya Tulis Lain Arberry,Lance L. “The Evolving Executive: Provisional Decrees and Their Impact on Brazil's Executive-Legislative Relationship”, theses University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2013. Arsil, Fitra. Teori Sistem Pemerintahan: Pergeseran Konsep dan Saling Kontribusi Antar Sistem Pemerintahan di Berbagai Negara, (Depok: Rajawali Press, 2017). Figuerido, Argelina Cheibub dan Fernando Limongi, “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil”, dalam Comparative Politics, Vol. 32, No.2 (Januari 2000). Kim, James Je Heon.“Case for Constrained Unilateralism: Decree of Necessity and Urgency in Argentina, 1916-2004”, paper was presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, American Political Science Association, and the Quantitative Methods Seminar at Columbia University. September 21, 2007. Morgado, Helena Zani and Hugo Anciaes, “Provisional Measure: anUrgent and Relevant Subject” Revistada Faculdade de Direito da UERJ, V.2, n. 22, jul/dez.2012. Gabriel L. Negretto, “Shifting Constitutional Designs in Latin America: A Two-Level Explanation”, Texas Law Review, Volume 89, 1777, June2011. ------------------------, “Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America: The Cases of Brazil and Argentina”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol.37 No.5, June 2004. Neto,Octavio Armorim. “Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, Coalition Discipline in Brazil”, dalam Scott Morgenstern dan Benito Nacif, ed., Legislative Politics in Latin America, (New York:Cambridge University Press, 2002). ------------------------. “The Presidential Calculus Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas.” Comparative Political Studies, Volume 39 Number 4 May 2006 (Sage Publications, 2006). Payne,J. Mark., Daniel Zovatto G., dan Mercedes Mateo Díaz, Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America, (Washington:Inter-American Development Bank, 2007). Pereira, Carlos. Timothy J. Power and Lucio Renno, “Under What Condition Do Presidents Resort to Decree Power? Theory and Evidence from the Brazilian Case”, dalam The Journal of Politics, Vol.67, No.1. February 2005. Power,Timothy J. “The Pen is Mightier Than the Congress: Presidential Decree Power in Brazil.” dalam John M. Carey dan Matthew S. Shugart, ed., Executive Decree Authority, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998). Schmidt, Gregory. “Presidential Usurpation of Congressional Preference. The Evolution of Executive Decree in Peru” dalam John M.Carey& Matthew Soberg Shugart [eds]. Executive Decree Authority. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998). Tsebelis, George. “Decision Making in Political System: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, Multipartism,” British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, no. 3 (Juli., 1995). Peraturan dan Putusan Konstitusi Argentina http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/ english.php (diakses 6 Mei 2013, Pukul 11:46 WIB). Konstitusi Brazil http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/br00000_.html (diakses 6 Mei 2013, Pukul 14.31 WIB). Konstitusi Ekuador http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Ecuador/ english08.html (diakses 6 Mei 2013, Pukul 14:07 WIB). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-III/2005. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016. Internet http://www.perubahan.co/kolom/102/pasal-22-uud-1945-dan-ajaran-konstitusi%EF%80%AA.html http://ksp.go.id/presiden-tidak-menandatangani-uu-md3/index.html https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/06/19124111/jokowi-pertimbangkan-keluarkan-perppu-untuk-batalkan-pasal-kontroverial-di https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/17/09425041/cerita-di-balik-perppu-pilkada-langsung-dan-opsi-atas-uu-md3 https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180112172226-32-268476/kpu-usul-jokowi-keluarkan-perppu-verifikasi-faktual-parpolatau https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/13/16522831/kpk-usul-pemerintah-terbitkan-perppu-untuk-ganti-peserta-pilkada-yang-jadi

Download

Share

COinS