•  
  •  
 

DOI

10.21143/jhp.vol47.no1.136

Abstract

Since Indonesia has known and enforced the concept of tort, an act regarded as tort is not only actions contrary to the law, but an act that violates the principles of propriety, the principles of thoroughness and cautionary principle also included in tort. Around 2010, it was found that the act of not fulfilling the decision of court which has binding power associated for compensatory money in cases of corruption becomes the basis of a tort lawsuit, where the problem is that court verdict is not a main legal source for countries which adopt civil law such as Indonesia. Therefore, this paper will explain more on regulation regarding lawsuit filing pursuant to Article 1365 Civil Code, particularly in terms of not implementing court decisions with binding power related to the fulfillment of payment of compensation in corruption

Bahasa Abstract

Sejak Indonesia mengenal dan memberlakukan konsep perbuatan melawan hukum, suatu perbuatan dianggap sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum tidak hanya perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan undang-undang, akan tetapi perbuatan yang melanggar asas kepatutan, asas ketelitian dan asas kehati-hatian juga termasuk dalam perbuatan melawan hukum. Sekitar tahun 2010, ditemukan bahwa perbuatan tidak memenuhi isi putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap terkait pembayaran uang pengganti pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi dijadikan dasar gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum, padahal putusan bukan sumber hukum utama bagi negara yang menganut sistem hukum civil law seperti Indonesia. oleh karena itu dalam penulisan ini akan menjelaskan lebih lanjut mengenai pengaturan pengajuan gugatan berdasar Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata, khususnya dalam hal tidak melaksanakan putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap terkait pemenuhan pembayaran uang pengganti dalam tindak pidana korupsi

References

Books Ferrera, Gerald R. Cyberlaw: Text and Cases. USA: South Western, 2004. Ferrera, Gerald R., et al. Cyber Law: Tax and Cases. USA: South Western, 2012. Gibney, Frank. Pacific Ties: The United States of America and An emerging ‘Pacific community’? in Anthony McGrew and Christopher Brook, ed. The Open University: New York,1998. Makarim, Edmon. Kompilasi Hukum Telematika. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003. Regulations California Code of Virtual Currency, Assembly Bill No. 1326 Indonesia Civil Code Law Number 10 of 2011 Concerning Amendments of Law Number 32 of 1997 Concerning Futures Trading Law Number 8 of 1995 Concerning Capital Markets Law Number 7 of 2011 Concerning Currency Value Added Tax Directive Journals Angels, James J. and Douglas McCabe. “The Ethics of Payments: Paper, Plastic, or Bitcoin?”. Business Ethics Journal. January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2379233 Bahlke, Conrad, et.al. “Recent Development in the Regulatory Treatment of Bitcoin”. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal. Jan 2016. Vol. 28, Issue 1. Goldman Sachs. “All About Bitcoin: Global Macro Research”. Issue 21. March 2014. Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research Harvey, Campbell R. “Do Cryptocurrencies Such as Bitcoin Have a Future? Yes: Don't Judge Bitcoin by Its Early, Inevitable Problems”. Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition. Vol. 265, Issue 49. Jeffrey, Chu, et.al. “Statistical Analysis of the Exchange Rate of Bitcoin”. PLoS One Journal. Vol. 10, Issue 7. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133678 Kiviat, Trevor. “Beyond Bitcoin: Issue In Regulating Blockchain Transaction”. Duke Law Journal. December 2015. Vol. 65 Issue 3. p569-608. 40p. Luther, William J. “Bitcoin and The Future of Digital Payment”. Independent Review. Winter 2016. Vol. 20 Issue 3. p397-404. 8p. Parthemer, Mark R. and Sasha A. Klein. “Bitcoin: Change for a Dollar?”. Journal of Financial Service Professionals. November 2014, Vol. 4, p. 16-18. Polasik, Michal, et. al. “Price Fluctuation and The Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry”. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2016. Vol. 20 Issue 1. p9-49. 41p. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2016.1061413 Raskin, Max. “Realm of The Coin - Bitcoin and Civil Procedure”. Journal of Corporate & Financial Law. 2015. Vol. 20 Issue 4. p969-1011. 43p. Raymaekers, Wim. “Cryptocurrency Bitcoin: Disruption, Challenges and Opportunities”. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems. Spring 2015. Vol. 9 Issue 1. p30-40. 11p. Tsukerman, Misha. “The Block Is Hot - A Survey of The State of Bitcoin Regulation And Suggestion For The Future”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2015. Vol. 30. p.1127-1169 Tridevi, Anjani. “Closer Bitcoin Scrunity On Way”. The Wall Street Journal – Eastern Edition,.Vol. 263: 60. March 2014. http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview /1507139629?accountid=13876 Swartz, Nicole D. “Bursting the Bitcoin Bubble: The Case To Regulate Digital Currency as a Security or Commodity”. Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property. Fall 2014. Vol. 17. Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee. “Bitcoin: The revolution of the Payment System?” Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems. Winter 2015/2016. Vol. 9, Issue 4. Zohar, Aviv. “Bitcoin: Under The Hood Communications of the ACM”. September 2015. Vol. 58 Issue 9. p104-113. 10p. DOI: 10.1145/2701411. Cases United States v. Faiella, 39 F. Supp. 3d 544, 545–47 (S.D.N.Y. 2014), www.assetsearchblog.com/files/2014/03/Shrem-Docket-Report.pdf, accessed February 12, 2016 United States v. Ulbricht, 31 F. Supp. 3d 540, 548 (S.D.N.Y. 2014), http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usaosdny/ legacy/2015/03/25/US%20v.%20Ross%20Ulbricht%20Indictment. pdf, accessed February 12, 2016 Secs.& Exch. Comm’n v. Shavers, No. 4:13-CV-416, 2014 WL 4652121 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2014), http://www.law.du.edu/documents/corporategovernance/ securities-matters/shavers/SEC-v-Shavers-No-4-13-CV-416- E-D-Tex-Sept-18-2014.pdf, accessed February 12, 2016 Websites Dougherty, Carter. “Goldman Sachs Sees Bitcoin Future in Payments Over Money”. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-12/goldmansachs- sees-bitcoin-s-promise-in-payments-over-currency. Accessed February 14, 2016. Marois, Michael B. & Carter Dougherty. “California Says State Law Grants Right to Oversee Bitcoin”. Bloomberg.com http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-04/california-says-state-lawgrants- right-to-oversee-bitcoin.html. Accesed February 14, 2016 Nakamoto, Satoshi. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”. www.bitcoin.org. Accessed February 15, 2016 Nash, James. “California Agency Abandons Plans To Regulate Digital Currency”. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05- 22/california-agency-abandons-plans-to-regulate-digital-currency. Accessed January 22, 2016 https://blockchain.info/charts/n-unique. Accessed February 14, 2016 https://www.weusecoins.com/en/getting-started/. Accessed February 14, 2016 http://www.coindesk.com/price. Accessed July 26, 2016 http://www.bi.go.id/id/ruang-media/siaran-pers/Pages/SP_160614.aspx. Accesed February 14, 2016 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf. Accessed February 12, 2016

Download

Share

COinS