DOI
10.21143/jhp.vol46.no2.74
Abstract
It is very likely that most environmental crimes involve corporation, in the sense that the crimes were conducted within the scope of corporation and on behalf of the corporation. This contribution attempts to answer the questions of how corporate criminal liability has evolved in several jurisdictions, and how this concept has been interpreted and implemented in Indonesia. The contribution explains the development of corporate criminal liability, and classifies it into liability for corporation and liability for corporate officers. Based on such theoretical foundations, the contribution critically analyses the formulation of corporate criminal liability and officers' liability in various legislations related to environmental protection and in various court decisions in Indonesia. It is observed that some laws and rulings failed to make a clear distinction between criminal liability for corporation and that for its high ranking officers. The failure result in some rulings where a corporation being held liable although it was not a defendant, or a director was likely to be put in jail although he was not a defendant. The contribution recommends some changes in corporate and officers' criminal liability in Indonesia. In particular, this contribution criticizies the use of individual criminal liability, and argues that to hold an officer liable the government needs to prove the contribution of the officer in the criminal conduct.
Bahasa Abstract
Sangat mungkin bahwa sebagian besar kejahatan lingkungan rnelibatkan korporasi, dalam arti bahwa kejahatan dilakukan dalam lingkup korporasi dan atas nama korporasi. Kontribusi ini mencoba untuk mer,jawab pertanyaan pertanyaan tentang bagaimana tanggung jawab pidana korporasi telah berkembang dalam beberapa yurisdiksi, dan bagaimana konsep ini telah ditafsirkan dan diimplernentasikan di Indonesia. kontribusi menjelaskan perkembangan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi, dan mengklasifikasikan menjadi kewajiban bagi perusahaan dan kewajiban untuk pejabat perusahaan. Berdasarkan teori dasar tersebut, tulisan ini kritis menganalisa perumusan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dan kewajiban petugas 'dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan perlindungan lingkungan dan dalam berbagai keputusan pengadilan di Indonesia. Diamati bahwa beberapa hukum dan putusan, gaga/ membuat perbedaan yang jelas antara tanggung jawab pidana untuk korporasi dan untuk pejabat yang tinggi. Hasil kegagalan dalarn beberapa putusan terhadap sebuah perusahaan yang dimintai tanggung jawab meskipun itu bukan terdakwa; atau direktur kemungkinan besar akan dimasukkan ke dalam penjara meskipun ia bukan terdakwa. Tulisan ini merekornendasikan beberapa perubahan dalam perusahaan dan tanggung jawab pidana pejabat di Indonesia. Secara khusus, tulisan ini mengkritisi penggunaan pertanggungjawaban pidana individu, dan berpendapat bahwa untuk mengadakan petugas tanggung jawab pemerintah perlu membuktikan kontribusi dari petugas dalam melakukan kejahatan
References
Buku/Artikel Jurnal
Aagaard, Todd S. "A Fresh Look At The Responsible Relation Doctrine", Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 96, 2006.
Allen, Michael J. Textbook on Criminal Law, 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Anderson, Helen. "Directors' Liability for Corporate Faults and Defaults-An International Comparison", Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 18, January, 2009.
Bernau, Patrick. Decision and Punishment: Or-Hold Bankers Responsible!: Corporate Criminal Liability .fromcan Economic Perspective, dalam: Dominik Brodowski, et al. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Criminal Liability. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
Bragg, Jennifer; John Bentivoglio; dan Andrew Collins. "Onus of Responsibility: The Changing Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine", Food and Drug Law Journal, Vol. 65, 2010.
Card, Richard. Criminal Law. 2l5t ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Clinard, Marshall B.; dan Peter C. Yeager. Corporate Crime. New York: The
Free Press, 1980.
Elliott, Catherine; dan Frances Quinn. Criminal Law. 3rd ed. Essex: Pearson Education, Ltd., 2000.
Fisse, Brent; dan John Braithwaite (1988). "The.Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism·and Accountability", Sydney Law Review, VoL 11, 1988.
Fisse, Brent; dan John Braithwaite (1993). Corporations, Crime and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Foster, Neil. "Individual Liability of Company Officers". Dalam: James Gobert dan Ana-Maria Pascal (eds.), European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Routledge, 2011.
Gobert, James The Evolving Legal Test of Corporate Criminal Liability, Dalam: John Minkes dan Leonard Minkes (eds.), Corporate and White collar Crime. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2008.
Gobert, James. Squaring the Circle: The Relationship between Individual and Organizational Fault, dalam: James Gobert dan Ana-Maria Pascal (eds.). European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Routledge, 2011.
Greenberg, Joshua D. dan Ellen C. Brotman. "Strict Vicarious Criminal Liability for Corporations and Corporate Executives: Stretching the
Boundaries of Criminalization", American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 51, 2014.
Harding, Christopher. Criminal Enterprise: Individuals, Organisations and Criminal Responsibility. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2007.
Henning, Peter J. "A New Crime For Corporate Misconduct?", Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 84, 2014.
Keulen, Berend F.; and Erik Gritter. Corporate Criminal Liability in the Netherlands, dalam: Mark Pieth dan Radha Ivory (eds.). Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, And Risk. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
Kushner, Amiad. "Applying The Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine Outside the Public Welfare Context", Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 93, 2003.
Mullikin, Nancy. "Holding the "Responsible Corporate Officer" Responsible: Addressing the Need for Expansion of Criminal Liability for Corporate Environmental Violators", Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 3, 2010.
The Law Commission, "Criminal Law: Involuntary Manslaughter", Consultation Paper No 135, tersedia pada: <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2015/06/No.l 35-Crirninal-Law-Involuntary Manslaughter-A-Consultation-Paper.pdf->, diakses pada bulan Mei 2016.
The Law Commission of England and Wales. "Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts: A Consultation Paper", Consultation Paper No 195, 2010. Tersedia pada <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2015/06/cp195_Criminal_Liability_consultation.pdf->, diakses pada Februari 2016.
de Maglie, Cristina. "Models of Corporate Criminal Liability in Comparative Law", Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 4(3), 2005.
Pieth, Mark; dan Radha Ivciry. Emergence and Convergence: Corporate Criminal Liability Principles in Overview, dalam: Mark Pieth dan Radha Ivory (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, and Risk. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
Pinto, Amanda; dan Martin Evans. Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2003.
Punch, Maurice. The Organizational Component in Corporate Crime, dalam: James Gobert dan Ana-Maria Pascal (eds.). European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Routledge, 2011.
Rahmadi, Takdir. Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia, Ed. II. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.
Sarre, Rick. Penalising Corporate 'Culture': The Key to Safer Corporate Activity?, dalam: James Gobert dan Ana-Maria Pascal (eds.). European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Routledge, 2011.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Cet. II. Jakarta: Grafiti Press, 2007.
Stem, Yedidia Z. "Corporate Criminal Personal Liability: Who is the ·
Corporation?", Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 13(1), 1987.
Stessens, Guy. "Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective", The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 43(3), 1994.
Webb,. Dan K.; Steven F. Molo; dan James F. Hurst. "Understanding and Avoiding Corporate and Exe utive Criminal Liability", The Business Lawyer, Vol. 49(2), February 1994.
Yarosky, Harvey. "The Criminal Liability of Corporations", McGill Law Journal, Vol. 10(2), 1964.
Putusan Pengadilan
Mahkamah Agung, Putusan No. K/Pid .Sus /2010, Republik Indonesia v. Kim Young Woo (2010).
Mahkamah Agung, Putusan No 1363 K/PID.SUS/2012, Republik Indonesia v.
Ibrahim Lisaholit (2012).
PN Manado, Putusan No. 284/Pid.B/2005/PN.Mdo, Republik Indonesia v. PT. Newmont Minahasa Raya dan Richard Bruce Ness (2005).
PN Pelalawan, Putusan No. 228/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.Plw, Republik Indonesia v.
Adei Plantation and Industr (2013).
United States v. Twenti.eth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656 (2d Cir 1989).
United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., 821 F.2d 844 (1st Cir 1987).
Recommended Citation
Wibisana, Muhammad Andri Gunawan
(2016)
"KEJAHATAN LINGKUNGAN OLEH KORPORASI: MENCARI BENTUK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI DAN PEMIMPIN/PENGURUS KORPORASI UNTUK KEJAHATAN LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA?,"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 46:
No.
2, Article 2.
DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol46.no2.74
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol46/iss2/2