LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Authors

Qiyam Maulana Binu Soesanto, Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, JapanFollow
Laksamana Rayhan Utomo, Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, JapanFollow
Indriyani Rachman, Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, JapanFollow
Toru Matsumoto, Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, JapanFollow

Author ORCID Identifier

None

Article Classification

Environmental Science

Abstract

Cimahi City is located in West Java Province, Indonesia. With a population of half million and the annual waste generation per capita reaching 0.48 kg/day, managing municipal waste has become increasingly challenging. To date, waste management costs in Cimahi City have not been specifically addressed. In addition to the total cost, there is also a plan to move the final landfill site from TPA Sarimukti, which is located approximately 34 km from the city center to a new final landfill site in TPA Legok Nangka, which is located approximately 56 km from Cimahi Municipality. This move will cause an increase in the cost to Cimahi Municipality. The aim of this study was to analyze the optimum waste management strategies for Cimahi City according to the environmental and cost-benefit impacts of the landfill site move. We used life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis to determine the optimum solution for waste management strategies of Cimahi City. Four scenarios, including the addition of waste banks, were compared as municipal waste management strategies. The switch of landfills did not contribute significantly to the total CO2 equivalent emitted. Increasing the number of waste banks could be an alternative to reducing the cost of disposing waste to landfills. Scenario (SC)-2 the scenario with additional government waste banks established, provided the highest net present value equal to IDR 1,428,622 per tonne of waste managed and was considered the most profitable in terms of the cost-benefit ratio. Hence, SC-2 was the most preferred for implementation in Cimahi City.

References

Aprilia, A., Tezuka, T., & Spaargare, G. (2012). Household Solid Waste Management in Jakarta, Indonesia: A Socio-Economic Evaluation. In Waste Management - An Integrated Vision. https://doi.org/10.5772/51464

Apriliyanti, P. D., Soemarno, S., & Meidiana, C. (2015). Evaluasi kinerja bank sampah Kartini Mandiri Desa Pesanggrahan Kota Batu. J-Pal, 6(2), 143–152.

Aye, L., & Widjaya, E. R. (2006). Environmental and economic analyses of waste disposal options for traditional markets in Indonesia. Waste Management, 26(10), 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.010

Brown, D. P. (2015). Garbage: How population, landmass, and development interact with culture in the production of waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 98, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.012

Chaerul, M., & Rahayu, S. A. (2019). Cost Benefit Analysis dalam Pengembangan Fasilitas Pengolahan Sampah: Studi Kasus Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 9(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.3.710-722

Damanhuri, E., Handoko, W., & Padmi, T. (2014). Municipal Solid Waste Management in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-73-4_8

DLH Cimahi. (2018). Dokumen Informasi Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Kota Cimahi.

Dobraja, K., Barisa, A., & Rosa, M. (2016). Cost-benefit Analysis of Integrated Approach of Waste and Energy Management. Energy Procedia, 95, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.030

Elagroudy, S., Elkady, T., & Ghobrial, F. (2011). Comparative Cost Benefit Analysis of Different Solid Waste Management Scenarios in Basrah, Iraq. Journal of Environmental Protection, 02(05), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.25064

Ghinea, C., & Gavrilescu, M. (2016). Costs Analysis of Municipal Waste Soil Management Community Changes in Solid Tnt Spiked Bioremediation Scenarios : Iasi – Romania Case Study Trial Using and. 24(03), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2012.721784

Hyltonne, K. N. (2016). Tort Law: A Modern Perspective. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=lucrDAAAQBAJ

International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. Geneva, Switzerland.

IPCC. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

Isharyati, A. W., Prasetya, A., & Cahyono, R. B. (2019). Optimization of operational techniques in waste management case study: Lhokseumawe City. E3S Web of Conferences, 76, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197603007

Khair, H., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2019). Analyzing household waste generation and its composition to expand the solid waste bank program in Indonesia: a case study of Medan City. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 21(4), 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00840-6

Khair, H., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2019). Environmental and Economic Assessment of Solid Waste Bank Activities in Indonesia: a Case Study of Medan City. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 75(6), II_189-II_196. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.75.6_ii_189

Khair, H., Siregar, I. Y., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2019). Material Flow Analysis of Waste Bank Activities in Indonesia: Case Study of Medan City. Indonesian Journal Of Urban And Environmental Technology, 3(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v3i1.5473

Laurent, A., Clavreul, J., Bernstad, A., Bakas, I., Niero, M., Gentil, E., … Hauschild, M. Z. (2014). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice. Waste Management, 34(3), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.004

Liu, G., Hao, Y., Dong, L., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). An emergy-LCA analysis of municipal solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.003

Martinez-Sanchez, V., Kromann, M. A., & Astrup, T. F. (2015). Life cycle costing of waste management systems: Overview, calculation principles and case studies. Waste Management, 36, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.033

OECD. (2021). Municipal waste (indicator). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/89d5679a-en

Phelia, A., Damanhuri, E. (2019). Evaluation of Landfill and Cost Benefit Analysis Waste Management System Landfill ( Case Study TPA Bakung Bandar Lampung City ). 25(2), 85–100.

Prasetyanti, R. (2014). Developing Community Based Solid Waste Management Scenario in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia: An Analysis Using System Dynamic Method. International Journal of Applied Sociology, 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijas.20140401.01

Puspasari, G. R., & Mussadun, M. (2017). Peran Kelembagaan Dalam Pengelolaan Persampahan Di Kabupaten Trenggalek. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 12(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v12i4.13505

Putri, A., & Sembiring, E. (2018). Evaluasi Kinerja Dan Keberlanjutan Program Bank Sampah Sebagai Salah Satu Pendekatan Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Dengan Konsep 3R ( Studi Kasus Di Kota Cimahi ) Performance Evaluation and Sustainability of Waste Bank Program As One of the Approaches in Waste. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 24(2), 69–78.

Raharjo, S., Junaidi, N., Bachtiar, V. S., Ruslinda, Y., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2016). Development of community-based waste recycling (garbage bank and 3R waste treatment facility) for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in Padang City, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025259

Schneider, S. H. (2017). Municipal solid waste. Energy Conversion, Second Edition, 1990(Exhibit 1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374192

Smith, G. S. (2002). Managerial Accounting for Libraries and Other Not-for-Profit Organizations (2nd).

Song, Q., Wang, Z., & Li, J. (2013). Environmental performance of municipal solid waste strategies based on LCA method: a case study of Macau. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.042

Syamsu, H. N. (2017). Estimasi Biaya dan Manfaat Ekonomi, Studi Kasus Bank Sampah Induk Cimahi, Kelurahan Padasuka, Kota Cimahi. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.

US EPA. (2020). Basic Information about the Waste Reduction Model (WARM). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/warm/basic-information-about-waste-reduction-model-warm

Wijayanti, D. R., & Suryani, S. (2015). Waste Bank as Community-based Environmental Governance: A Lesson Learned from Surabaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184(August 2014), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.077

Wulandari, D., Utomo, S. H., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2017). Waste bank: Waste management model in improving local economy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3), 36–41.

Yustiani, Y. (2019). OPERASIONAL BANK SAMPAH UNIT DALAM PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH PERKOTAAN. JURNALIS: Jurnal Lingkungan Dan Sipil, 2(2 SE-Articles). Retrieved from http://ejournal.lppm-unbaja.ac.id/index.php/jls/article/view/669

Recommended Citation

Soesanto, Qiyam Maulana Binu; Utomo, Laksamana Rayhan; Rachman, Indriyani; and Matsumoto, Toru (2021). LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 69-96.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v4i1.1107