Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-3867
Article Classification
Sustainable Development
Abstract
The high population and density of cities in Indonesia raise a number of urban problems that require creative and innovative solutions. One of the steps taken by the municipal government is to implement the concept of smart city, one of which is by utilizing information and communication technology (ICT). The municipal government applies ICT by creating websites and applications to provide a variety of city information and municipal government services to all residents that can also be shared on their online social network. However, it is not clear whether the residents perceive that the provided information is useful and whether the intentions to seek and share information from smart city platform are influenced by the perceived usefulness of the information and the citizen’ online social network attributes. Hence, this study was conducted with the aim to analyze the effect of the perceived usefulness of smart city information and social network attributes (number of ties and diversity of ties) on intention to seek and share information on smart city websites and applications in cities in Indonesia. The data were collected using a survey method, involving 1,161 respondents in 8 major cities in Indonesia, namely Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya, Semarang, Medan, Makassar, Denpasar, and Banjarmasin. The survey results were analyzed using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), and it is concluded that the perceived usefulness of smart city information and the residents’ online social network attributes have positive and significant effects on the intention to seek information and intention to share information on smart city websites and apps.
References
Abraham, R., Lubis, D. I., Indrawan, M., Komputer, I., Pertanian, T. I., & Pertanian, T. (2013). Visa Masuk Kota: Alternatif Kebijakan Kaum Urban untuk Mengatasi Kepadatan Penduduk Jakarta. In Pekan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Nasional Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa - Gagasan Tertulis 2013 (Issue November 2011).
Aljowder, T., Ali, M., & Kurnia, S. (2019). Systematic literature review of the smart city maturity model. 2019 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies, 3ICT 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT.2019.8910321
Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016
Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). From Online to Ubiquitous Cities: The Technical Transformation of Virtual Communities BT - Next Generation Society. Technological and Legal Issues (A. B. Sideridis & C. Z. Patrikakis (Eds.); pp. 360–372). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ngst.conf..360A/abstract
Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). Understanding Smart Cities: The Rise of the Smart City. In Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick? (Vol. 22). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57015-0
Anthopoulos, L. G., & Tougountzoglou, T. E. (2012). A Viability Model for Digital Cities: Economic and Acceptability Factors BT - Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications (C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.); pp. 79–96). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_6
Anthopoulos, L., Janssen, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). Smart Service Portfolios. 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2888618
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Catalog : 1101001. Statistik Indonesia 2020, 1101001, 790. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/04/29/e9011b3155d45d70823c141f/statistik-indonesia-2020.html
Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L. R. (1964). Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm: effects of past help on the response to dependency relationships. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040164
Bock, Zmud, Kim, & Lee. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
Boon-Itt, S. (2019). Quality of health websites and their influence on perceived usefulness, trust and intention to use: An analysis from Thailand. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0100-9
Caragliu, A., del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
Chalik, A. A., Lay, B. W., Fauzi, A., & Etty, R. (2011). Formulasi Kebijakan Sistem Pengolahan Sampah Perkotaan Berkelanjutan Studi Kasus : DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(1), 18–30. http://garuda.ristekbrin.go.id/documents/detail/950854
Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185–204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128
Chong, M., Habib, A., Evangelopoulos, N., & Park, H. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 682–692.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.005
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289–2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Constant, D, Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What is mine is ours, or is it? Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–422.
https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.5.4.400
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.119
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27). https://www.scinapse.io/papers/2036389121
Gardoni, M., Spadoni, M., & Vernadat, F. (2002). Developement and Feedbacks of a New Communication Tool to Harness Information and Knowledge and Know-How in Integrated Engineering — Case Study at Eads. In Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 77-84). Springer, Dordrecht.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9966-5_10
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Cent. Reg. Sci., 1–12. http://www.smartcity-ranking.eu/download/city_ranking_final.pdf
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
GSMA. (2013). Guide to Smart City: The Opportunity for Mobile Operators. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/iot/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cl_sc_guide_wp_02_131.pdf
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/a-primer-on-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem/book244583
Hampton, K. N. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement everyday use of communication technologies within social networks for civic and civil behaviors. Information Communication and Society, 14(4), 510–528.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.562219
Harahap, F. R. (2013). Dampak Urbanisasi Bagi Perkembangan Kota Di Indonesia. Society, 1(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.40
Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
Hou, L., Xie, J., Zhao, J., Zhao, M., Fan, M., Xiao, Q., Liang, J., & Chen, F. (2017). Roles of different initial Maillard intermediates and pathways in meat flavor formation for cysteine-xylose-glycine model reaction systems. In Food Chemistry (Vol. 232, pp. 135–144). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.133
Isaac, M. E., & Matous, P. (2017). Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana. Regional Environmental Change, 17(6), 1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3
Jahmani, K., Fadiya, S. O., Abubakar, A. M., & Elrehail, H. (2018). Knowledge content quality, perceived usefulness, KMS use for sharing and retrieval: A flock leadership application. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(4), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2017-0054
JSC LAB. (2020). Jakarta Smart City. JSC LAB. https://smartcity.jakarta.go.id/new/
Kanter, R. M., & Litow, S. S. (2009). Informed and Interconnected: A Manifesto for Smarter Cities. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper, (09-141). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1420236
KOMINFO. (2017). Individu memiliki Smarphone. Survey Penggunaan TIK 2017, 18–19.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
Nuseir, M. T. (2020). Is advertising on social media effective? An empirical study on the growth of advertisements on the Big Four (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp). International Journal of Procurement Management, 13(1), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpm.2020.105191
Park, J. H., Gu, B., Leung, A. C. M., & Konana, P. (2014). An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in online investment communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.002
Park, J., Konana, P., Gu, B., & & Leung, A. (2010). An Investigation of Information Sharing and seeking Behaviors in Virtual Communities. ICIS 2010 Proceedings, 242.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/242
Pinochet, L. H. C., Romani, G. F., de Souza, C. A., & Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2019). Intention to live in a smart city based on its characteristics in the perception by the young public. Revista de Gestão, 26(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/rege-06-2018-0077
Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42(2), 317–327.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
Sairamesh, J., Lee, A., & Anania, L. (2004). Session details: Information cities. Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 3263538. https://doi.org/10.1145/3263538
Sanz-Cruzado, J., & Castells, P. (2018). Enhancing structural diversity in social networks by recommending weak ties. RecSys 2018 - 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240371
Savolainen, R. (2019). Modeling the interplay of information seeking and information sharing: A conceptual analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(4), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2018-0266
Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Growth Effects of Human Capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(May), 324–335. https://www.nber.org/papers/w11615
Skvoretz, J. (2013). Diversity, integration, and social ties: Attraction versus repulsion as drivers of intra- and intergroup relations. American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 486–517. https://doi.org/10.1086/674050
Sproull, L., & Patterson, J. F. (2004). Making information cities livable. Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/966389.966412
Sukarto, H. (2006). PEMILIHAN MODEL TRANSPORTASI di DKI JAKARTA dengan ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN “ PROSES HIRARKI ANALITIK .” 3(1), 25–36. https://sipil-uph.tripod.com/vol3.1.3.pdf
Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767
Titmuss, R. M. (2018). The gift relationship (reissue): From human blood to social policy. Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv6zdcmh
Toppeta, D. (2010). The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, in Livable, “Sustainable Cities.
http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf.
Van Soom, E. (2009). Measuring levels of supply and demand for e-services and e-government: a toolkit for cities. Smart cities research brief, 3.
https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/215279
Venkatesh; Viaswanath, & Davis; Fred D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Wang, Yanyan; Zhao, Y. (2017). Seeking information through weak ties on Facebook. IConference 2017 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.9776/17366
Washburn, D., & Sindhu, U. (2009). Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Growth, 17(2), 1-17.
https://www.itworldcanada.com/archive/Themes/Hubs/Brainstorm/forrester_help_cios_smart_city.pdf
Wasko, M. M. L., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 29(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
Weng, L., Karsai, M., Perra, N., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2018). Attention on Weak Ties in Social and Communication Networks. In Complex spreading phenomena in social systems (pp. 213-228). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_12
Widmayer, P. (1999). Building Digital Metropolis: Chicago’s Future Networks. IT Professional, 1(4), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/6294.781624
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576
Yudo, S., & Said, N. I. (2001). Masalah Pencemaran Air Di Jakarta, Sumber Dan Alternatif Penanggulangannya. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 2(2), 199–206.
https://ejurnal.bppt.go.id/index.php/JTL/article/view/214
Zorzi, O. (2019). Granovetter (1983): The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung (pp. 243-246). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21742-6_55
Recommended Citation
Rouli, Juliana
(2021).
THE INFLUENCES OF PERCEIVED USEFULNESS AND ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORK ATTRIBUTE ON THE INTENTIONS TO SEEK AND SHARE INFORMATION ON INDONESIA’S SMART CITY DIGITAL PLATFORM.
Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 1-30.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v4i1.1109