•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Environmental identity refers to an individual’s understanding of how their environment shapes their identity and relationships. This connection may cause climate change anxiety and motivate pro-environmental behavior. Using an explanatory, cross-sectional design, we examined whether environmental identity (EI) predicts climate change anxiety (CCA) and whether pro-environmental behavior (PEB) moderates their relationship. Seven hundred sixty-one Filipinos aged 18–25 completed the Revised Environmental Identity Scale, Climate Change Anxiety Scale, and Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale. Our findings revealed a significant positive relationship between environmental identity and anxiety about climate change. However, moderation analysis indicated that environmental identity is only associated with climate change anxiety among participants with high pro-environmental behavior. Thus, Gen Z Filipinos who connect more with nature (high EI) experience greater anxiety (high CCA) only for those who actively engage in PEB. This study discusses the practical and theoretical implications of the findings.

Bahasa Abstract

Identitas lingkungan merujuk pada pemahaman individu mengenai bagaimana lingkungan membentuk hubungan dan identitas mereka. Keterkaitan ini dapat menimbulkan kecemasan perubahan iklim dan memotivasi perilaku pro-lingkungan. Kami menguji apakah identitas lingkungan (EI) dapat memprediksi kecemasan perubahan iklim (CCA) dan apakah perilaku pro-lingkungan (PEB) memoderasi hubungan tersebut menggunakan desain cross-sectional eksplanatori. Tujuh ratus enam puluh satu orang Filipina berusia 18-25 tahun mengisi Skala Revisi Identitas Lingkungan, Skala Kecemasan Perubahan Iklim dan Skala Perilaku Pro-Lingkungan. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan positif yang signifikan antara identitas lingkungan dan kecemasan perubahan iklim. Namun, analisis moderasi mengindikasikan bahwa identitas lingkungan hanya terasosiasi dengan kecemasan perubahan iklim pada partisipan dengan skor perilaku pro-lingkungan yang tinggi. Dengan demikian, gen Z Filipina yang lebih terhubung dengan alam (skor EI tinggi) mengalami kecemasan yang lebih tinggi pula (skor CCA tinggi) hanya ditemukan pada partisipan yang secara aktif terlibat dalam perilaku pro-lingkungan (skor PEB tinggi). Studi ini membahas implikasi praktis dan teoritis dari temuan tersebut.

References

Anderson, D. J., & Krettenauer, T. (2021). Connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behaviour from early adolescence to adulthood: A comparison of urban and rural Canada. Sustainability, 13(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073655

Andrade, C. (2020). The limitations of online surveys. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(6), 575–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957496

Aruta, J. J. B. R. (2023). Environmental psychology in the Philippines: Growth, challenges and prospects. International Journal of Psychology, 58(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12896

Aruta, J. J. B. R., & Guinto, R. R. (2022). Climate anxiety in the Philippines: Current situation, potential pathways, and ways forward. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 6, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100138

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bartolo, M. G., Servidio, R., Palermiti, A. L., Nappa, M. R., & Costabile, A. (2023). Pro-environmental behaviors and well-being in adolescence: The mediating role of place attachment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105759

Boulianne, S., Lalancette, M., & Ilkiw, D. (2020). “School Strike 4 Climate”: Social media and the mobilization of young people in Canada. Media and Communication, 8(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2768

Bradley, G. L., Babutsidze, Z., Chai, A., & Reser, J. P. (2020). The role of climate change risk perception, response efficacy, and psychological adaptation in pro-environmental behavior: A two-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101410

Bruni, C. M., Schultz, P. W., & Woodcock, A. (2021). The balanced structure of environmental identity. Sustainability, 13(15), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158168

Cananua-Labid, S. A., Quilatan, J. A. M., & Bolante, L. R. A. (2025). Willingness to pay for a restored and protected watershed: Evidence from the countryside. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 29(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.v29.i2.1535

Capaldi, C., Passmore, H., Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., & Dopko, R. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a well-being intervention. International Journal of Well-being, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449

Chukwuorji, J. C., Iorfa, S. K., Nzeadibe, T. C., & Ifeagwazi, C. M. (2018). Role of climate change awareness and pro-environmental behaviour in subjective well-being. Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 39–48.

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.

Clayton, S. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263

Clayton, S., Czellar, S., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Skibins, J. C., Salazar, G., Tseng, Y., Irkhin, B., & Monge-Rodriguez, F. S. (2021). Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042387

Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., Hodge, C., Solomon, G. M., & Marlon, J. R. (2020). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e503122017-001.

Coffey, Y., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Islam, M. S., & Usher, K. (2021). Understanding eco-anxiety: A systematic scoping review of current literature and identified knowledge gaps. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047

Confetto, M. G., Covucci, C., & Addeo, F. (2023). Sustainability advocacy antecedents: How social media content influences sustainable behaviours among Generation Z. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(6), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2021-5038

Dąbrowski, L. S., Środa-Murawska, S., Smoliński, P., & Biegańska, J. (2022). Rural-urban divide: Generation Z and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability, 14(23), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316111

D’Arco, M., Marino, V., & Resciniti, R. (2023). Exploring the pro-environmental behavioral intention of Generation Z in the tourism context: The role of injunctive social norms and personal norms. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(6), 1100–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2171049

Desrochers, S., Andreassi, J., & Thompson, C. (2004). Identity theory. Organization Management Journal, 1(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2004.14

Dîrțu, M. C., & Prundeanu, O. (2023). Narcissism and pro-environmental behaviors: The mediating role of self-monitoring, environmental control and attitudes. Sustainability, 15(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021571

Feather, G., & Williams, M. N. (2022). A psychometric evaluation of the climate change anxiety scale. PsyArXiv. 54(4), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uzf7j

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.682086

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & Van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00278-3

Hidayat, Z., & Hidayat, D. (2021). Environmental sense of Gen Z in online communities: Exploring the roles of sharing knowledge and social movement on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences (BIS-HSS 2020), Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311741

Hrabok, M., Delorme, A., & Agyapong, V. I. (2020). Threats to mental health and well-being associated with climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 76, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102295

Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030002003

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally, and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Lavergne, K. J., & Pelletier, L. G. (2015). Predicting individual differences in the choice of strategy to compensate for attitude-behaviour inconsistencies in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.001

Lemée, C., Fleury-Bahi, G., & Navarro, O. (2019). Impact of place identity, self-efficacy and anxiety state on the relationship between coastal flooding risk perception and the willingness to cope. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00499

Li, Y., Wang, B., & Saechang, O. (2022). Is female a more pro-environmental gender? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138002

Magulod, G. (2018). Climate change awareness and environmental attitude of college students in one campus of a state university in the Philippines. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 12(2), 211–220.

Markle, G. L. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior: Does it matter how it's measured? Development and validation of the pro-environmental behavior scale (PEBS). Human Ecology, 41, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9614-8

Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Donat, M., Kiral Ucar, G., Korneev, A. A., Heidmets, M. E., Kamble, S., Khachatryan, N., Kryazh, I. V., Larionow, P., Rodríguez-González, D., Serobyan, A., Zhou, C., & Clayton, S. (2022). The role of environmental identity and individualism/collectivism in predicting climate change denial: Evidence from nine countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101899

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7

Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L., Bhullar, N., Aquino, S. D., Marot, T., Schermer, J. A., Wlodarczyk, A., Lu, S., Jiang, F., Maran, D. A., Yadav, R., Ardi, R., Chegeni, R., Ghanbarian, E., Zand, S., & Karasu, M. (2022). Climate anxiety, well-being and pro-environmental action: Correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 1-14.  ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887

Ojala, M. (2012). Regulating worry, promoting hope: How do children, adolescents, and young adults cope with climate change? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2022.2108396 

Parzonko, A. J., Balinska, A., & Sieczko, A. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviors of Generation Z in the context of the concept of homo socio-oeconomicus. Energies, 14(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061597

Pinho, M. (2025). The role of parental identity in experiencing climate change anxiety and pro-environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579893

Poortinga, W., Demski, C., & Steentjes, K. (2023). Generational differences in climate-related beliefs, risk perceptions and emotions in the UK. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(229), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00870-x

Prayag, G., Aquino, R. S., Hall, C. M., Chen, N., & Fieger, P. (2022). Is Gen Z really that different? Environmental attitudes, travel behaviours and sustainability practices of international tourists to Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(12), 2732–2753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2131795

Reyes, J. A. (2014). Environmental attitudes and behaviors in the Philippines. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p87

Reyes, M. E., Carmen, B. P., Luminarias, M. E., Mangulabnan, S. A., & Ogunbode, C. A. (2021). An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. 42(9), 7448-7456.  ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02099-3

Schwartz, S. E. O., Benoit, L., Clayton, S., Parnes, M., Swenson, L., & Rowe, S. (2022). Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer. Current Psychology, 42, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6

Shadiqi, M. A., Djuwita, R., Febriana, S.K.T., Septiannisa, L., Wildi, M., & Rahmawati, Y. (2022). Environmental self-identity and pro-environmental behavior in climate change issue: Mediation effect of belief in global warming and guilty feeling. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111(1), 012081. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1111/1/012081

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. A. J. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Tam, K. P., & Milfont, T. L. (2020). Towards a cross-cultural environmental psychology: The state of the field and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101474

Tass, M. A., & Malik, I. A. (2025). Driving environmental change: The impact of social media on Gen Z’s sustainability efforts. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 24, 623–641. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.3639

The jamovi project. (2022). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Vesely, S., Masson, T., Chokrai, P., Becker, A. M., Fritsche, I., Klöckner, C. A., Tiberio, L., Carrus, G., & Panno, A. (2021). Climate change action as a project of identity: Eight meta-analyses. Global Environmental Change, 70, 1-8. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102322

Wong, W. P., Pheh, K.-S., & Tan, C. S. (2024). Effects of a character strengths intervention on emerging adults’ identity formation, self-efficacy, and self-doubt. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 28(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1140424

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.