Abstract
The development of the digital world has driven changes in the live streaming commerce sales method, which is a combination of e-commerce with social media live streaming features. Flash sales are one strategy that is often used in marketing a product in live streaming commerce to increase sales quickly. Time pressure and stock pressure are components of flash sales that effectively force consumers to make impulsive purchases. By causing a scarcity effect on consumers, pressure can make consumers go through a long decision-making process and make unplanned purchases. In this study, researchers used the stimulus-organism-response theory to explain the role of this pressure on impulse buying behavior, through the theory of the competitive arousal model, pleasure-arousal-dominance, and consumer vulnerability. This study was conducted using a quantitative method through a survey of 483 respondents and concluded that time pressure has a direct influence on impulse buying behavior, but was not found in stock pressure. However, these two pressures still have an influence on arousal, pleasure, and consumer vulnerability, which can later trigger impulsive buying behavior. The implications of this study are useful for marketers in determining marketing strategies with the aim of encouraging spontaneous purchases and for regulators to protect consumer welfare.
Bahasa Abstract
Perkembangan dunia digital mendorong perubahan metode penjualan live streaming commerce yang merupakan gabungan dari e-commerce dengan fitur live streaming media sosial. Flash sale merupakan salah satu strategi yang kerap digunakan dalam memasarkan sebuah produk di live streaming commerce untuk menaikkan penjualan dengan singkat. Tekanan waktu dan tekanan stok adalah komponen pada flash sale yang efektif memaksa konsumen melakukan pembelian impulsif. Dengan menimbulkan scarcity effect pada konsumen, tekanan dapat membuat konsumen melewati proses pengambilan keputusan yang panjang dan melakukan pembelian yang tidak direncanakan. Pada penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan teori stimulus-organism-response menjelaskan peran tekanan tersebut pada perilaku impulse buying, melalui teori competitive arousal model, pleasure-arousal-dominance, dan consumer vulnerability. Peneltian ini dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif melalui survei kepada 483 responden dan menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa tekanan waktu memiliki pengaruh langsung terhadap perilaku impulse buying, namun tidak ditemukan pada tekanan stok. Namun, kedua tekanan ini tetap memiliki pengaruh terhadap arousal, pleasure, dan consumer vulnerability, yang nantinya dapat memicu perilaku pembelian yang impulsif. Implikasi pada penelitian ini berguna untuk pemasar dalam menentukan strategi pemasaran dengan tujuan mendorong pembelian spontan dan untuk pembuat regulasi demi melindungi kesejahteraan konsumen.
References
Ballantine, P. W., & Fortin, D. R. (2009). The effects of interactivity and product information on consumers’ emotional responses to an online retail setting. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 5(4), 260. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2009.027810
Batat, W. (2012). How do adolescents define consumer vulnerability? Toward a youth-centric approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 751–752.
Burkhardt, M., Nitsch, F. J., Spinler, S., & vanWassenhove, L. (2023). The effect of acute stress on humanitarian supplies management. Production and Operations Management, 32(8), 2546–2559. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13993
Cachón-Rodríguez, G., Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Fernández-Portillo, A. (2024). How compulsive and impulsive buying affect consumer emotional regulation. Is anxiety a differential element? European Journal of Management and Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-06-2023-0172
Chen, W.-K., Chen, C.-W., & Lin, Y.-C. (2023). Understanding the influence of impulse buying toward consumers’ post-purchase dissonance and return intention: an empirical investigation of apparel websites. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(11), 14453–14466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02333-z
Chen, X., & Li, L. (2023). Research on the Influence of Anchors’ Characteristics on Consumers’ Impulse Buying from the Perspective of Emotional Contagion. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 71–82). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32302-7_7
Cheng, S.-Y. (2018). Evaluation of Effect on Cognition Response to Time Pressure by Using EEG (pp. 45–52). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60483-1_5
Cinar, D. (2020). The Effect of Consumer Emotions on Online Purchasing Behavior (pp. 221–241). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0035-4.ch011
de Wulf, K., Schillewaert, N., Muylle, S., & Rangarajan, D. (2006). The role of pleasure in web site success. Information & Management, 43(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.10.005
Edwards, J. R. (2010). Seven Deadly Myths of Testing Moderation in Organizational Research. Routledge EBooks, 163–184. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867266-14
Fathia, N., & Vania, A. (2023). Impulsive buying behavior: Scarcity impact of flash sale through arousal as mediating variable. Jurnal Mantik, 7(3), 1766–1776.
Galentino, A., Bonini, N., & Savadori, L. (2017). Positive Arousal Increases Individuals’ Preferences for Risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02142
Godinho, S., Prada, M., & Garrido, M. V. (2016). Under Pressure: An Integrative Perspective of Time Pressure Impact on Consumer Decision-Making. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(4), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1148654
Goldsby, T. J., Michael Knemeyer, A., Miller, J. W., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2013). Measurement and Moderation: Finding the Boundary Conditions in Logistics and Supply Chain Research. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12013
Grosen, M. S., Sivertsen, M. F., & Hartley, J. M. (2024). Digital media revolution and stratificational inertia: A historical study of media usage and sociopolitical stratification in the age of social media. Poetics, 107, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101942
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 7).
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications, Ltd.
Herman, A. M., Elliott, M. v., & Johnson, S. L. (2023). Emotion-related impulsivity moderates the role of arousal on reflection impulsivity. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 225, 173557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173557
Hu, M., & Qin, X. bin. (2014). Time Pressure Effects on Impulse Buying in Sales Situation: Need for Cognitive Closure of Intermediary Role. Advanced Materials Research, 926–930, 4065–4068. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.926-930.4065
Huseynov, S., & Palma, M. A. (2021). Food decision-making under time pressure. Food Quality and Preference, 88, 104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104072
Kong, D., Zhan, S., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Can time pressure promote consumers’ impulse buying in live streaming E-commerce? Moderating effect of product type and consumer regulatory focus. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09788-0
Ladeira, W., Gandolfi, P. E., Tana, W., Gonçalves, C. A., Bertarini, P. L. L., Santini, F. de O., Azhar, M., Amaral, L. R. do, & Gomes, M. de S. (2024a). Energetic and Tense Arousal as Drivers of Willingness to Buy: Mediating Effects of Visual Attention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13082
Lamis, S. F., Handayani, P. W., & Fitriani, W. R. (2022). Impulse buying during flash sales in the online marketplace. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2068402
Li, H., Xu, Y., & Huang, L. (2016). Is there an optimal point to limit product quantity? A survey evidence. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings.
Li, G., Jiang, Y., & Chang, L. (2022). The Influence Mechanism of Interaction Quality in Live Streaming Shopping on Consumers’ Impulsive Purchase Intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918196
Lin, C. J., & Jia, H. (2023). Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043205
Marjerison, R. K., Hu, J., & Wang, H. (2022). The Effect of Time-Limited Promotion on E-Consumers’ Public Self-Consciousness and Purchase Behavior. Sustainability, 14(23), 16087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316087
Martaleni, M., Hendrasto, F., Hidayat, N., Alfandy Dzikri, A., & Nyoman Kerti Yasa, N. (2022). Flash sale and online impulse buying: Mediation effect of emotions. Innovative Marketing, 18(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(2).2022.05
Ngo, T. T. A., Nguyen, H. L. T., Nguyen, H. P., Mai, H. T. A., Mai, T. H. T., & Hoang, P. L. (2024). A comprehensive study on factors influencing online impulse buying behavior: Evidence from Shopee video platform. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35743
Nyrhinen, J., Sirola, A., Koskelainen, T., Munnukka, J., & Wilska, T.-A. (2024). Online antecedents for young consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108129
Pacheco, D. C., Moniz, A. I. D. de S. A., Caldeira, S. N., & Silva, O. D. L. (2022). Online Impulse Buying—Integrative Review of Psychological Factors (pp. 527–536). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5063-5_44
Petrolini, V., & Viola, M. (2020). Core Affect Dynamics: Arousal as a Modulator of Valence. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(4), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00474-w
Phuong Duy, N. B., & Thanh Khoa, B. (2022). Consumer behavior in Online Flash Sale: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis. 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765127
Prestini, S., & Sebastiani, R. (2021). Embracing consumer ambivalence in the luxury shopping experience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(5), 1243–1268. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1933
Sadeghein, R., Fitzgerald, P., & He, S. (2022). How Do Online Customer Reviews Impact Online Purchases? The Role of Online Review Examination as a Guilt/Shame Reduction Strategy: An Abstract (pp. 389–390). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95346-1_124
Soares, A. M., & Elmashhara, M. G. (2022). The Effect of Time Pressure on Shoppers’ Behavior: An Abstract (pp. 539–540). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95346-1_175
Suwito, G. A., & Susilowati, M. W. K. (2025). Scarcity effect on impulse buying: The mediating role of arousal. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i1.12418
Tafesse, W., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). Identifying factors affecting consumers purchase incidence at retail trade shows. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(4), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.04.005
Tanveer, T., Kazmi, S. Q., & Rahman, M. U. (2022). Determinants of Impulsive Buying Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for Offline Beauty Products. Nurture, 16(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v16i2.129
Tonetto, L. M., Rohenkohl, G., & Stein, L. M. (2008). Time pressure on consumer decision making. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 119–128.
Vannisa, D., Fansuri, A., & Ambon, I. M. (2020). The effect of flash sale program on shopping enjoyment and impulse buying on flash sale on C2C E-commerce. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 2534–2539.
Whitley, S. C., Trudel, R., & Kurt, D. (2018). The Influence of Purchase Motivation on Perceived Preference Uniqueness and Assortment Size Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy031
Wu, W., Lu, H., Wu, Y., & Fu, C. (2012). The effects of product scarcity and consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01000.x
Xu, Y., Dzever, S., & Zhao, G. (2023). Measuring the Effects of Pressure on Consumer Impulse Buying Intention in Online Group Buying. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.326549
Zhang, X., Chen, H., & Liu, Z. (2024). Operation strategy in an E‐commerce platform supply chain: whether and how to introduce live streaming services? International Transactions in Operational Research, 31(2), 1093–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13186
Recommended Citation
Hendra, Anthony E. and Adiwijaya, Karto
(2026)
"Consumer Spontaneous Purchases Under Pressure! Do the Roles of Time Pressure and Stock Pressure in Flash Sales Differ between Hedonic and Utilitarian Products?,"
ASEAN Marketing Journal: Vol. 18:
No.
1, Article 7.
DOI: 10.7454/amj.v18i1.1324
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/amj/vol18/iss1/7

