DOI
10.21143/jhp.vol56.no.3.3720
Abstract
Since mid-2023, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has prioritised the strengthening and harmonisation of Indonesian civil procedural law to better align with international practices and standards. This initiative seeks to enhance the competitiveness of Indonesian judicial institutions in resolving commercial disputes through acceding to relevant private international law instruments. The HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention is among the key private international law instruments identified by the Supreme Court as a priority for Indonesia's accession. Nonetheless, academic literature in the Indonesian language on private international law instruments, particularly those issued by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), remains limited. Professor Sudargo Gautama's work is among the few Indonesian-language contributions discussing the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention. This article provides an updated and comprehensive explanation of the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention to support the efforts of the Supreme Court and the Government of Indonesia in their preparations for accession to the Convention. The purpose of this article is to enhance understanding within the Indonesian legal community concerning the content and significance of the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention in the adjudication of civil or commercial disputes.
Bahasa Abstract
Sejak pertengahan tahun 2023, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (MA) telah memprioritaskan penguatan dan harmonisasi hukum acara perdata Indonesia agar lebih selaras dengan praktik dan standar internasional. Inisiatif ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan daya saing lembaga peradilan Indonesia dalam penyelesaian sengketa komersial melalui aksesi terhadap instrumen hukum perdata internasional yang relevan. HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention merupakan salah satu instrumen hukum perdata internasional yang diusulkan oleh MA sebagai prioritas utama untuk diaksesi oleh Indonesia. Meskipun demikian, literatur akademik berbahasa Indonesia yang membahas instrumen internasional dalam bidang hukum perdata internasional, khususnya instrumen yang diterbitkan oleh The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) sangat terbatas. Karya Profesor Sudargo Gautama termasuk di antara sedikit literatur berbahasa Indonesia yang membahas HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention. Artikel ini memberikan penjelasan yang lebih aktual dan komprehensif tentang HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, untuk mendukung upaya MA dan Pemerintah Indonesia dalam persiapan mengaksesi Konvensi tersebut. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk meningkatkan pemahaman khalayak hukum Indonesia mengenai isi dan peran HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata atau komersial.
References
Artikel jurnal
Amram, Philip W. “The Proposed Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad”. American Bar Association Journal 55. No. 7 (1969). Hlm. 651-655.
Brazil, Wayne D. “The Adversary Characters of Civil Discovery: A Critique and Proposals for Change”. Vanderbilt Law Review 31. No. 1295 (1978). Hlm. 1296-1361.
Burns, Margaret T. “The Hague Convention on Taking Evidence Abroad: Conflict over Pretrial Discovery”. Michigan Journal of International Law 7. No. 1 (1985). Hlm. 291-310.
Carter, James H. “Existing Rules and Procedures”. International Lawyer 13. No. 1 (1979). Hlm. 5-18.
Collins, Lawrence. “The Hague Evidence Convention and Discovery: A Serious Misunderstanding?”. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35. No. 4 (Oktober 1986). Hlm. 765-786.
Davies, Martin. “Bypassing the Hague Evidence Convention: Private International Law Implications of the Use of Video and Audio Conferencing Technology in Transnational Litigation”. American Journal of Comparative Law 55. No. 2 (2007). Hlm. 205-238.
Friederich, Brian “Reinforcing the Hague Convention on Taking Evidence Abroad After Blocking Statutes, Data Privacy Directives, and Aérospatiale”. San Diego International Law Journal 12 (2010). Hlm. 263-298.
Graveson, RH., Newman, KMH., Anton, AE., Edwards, DM. “The Eleventh Session of the Hague Conference of Private International Law”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 18. No. 3 (1969). Hlm. 618-680.
Hazard, Jr., Geoffrey C. “Discovery and the Role of the Judge in Civil Law Jurisdictions”. Notre Dame Law Review 73. No. 4 (1998). Hlm. 1017-1028.
Jansen, René. “Explaining the Methods for Taking Evidence Abroad Within the EU and Some First Observations on the Proposal for the Evidence Regulation (Recast)”. Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 4 (2019). Hlm. 753-770.
Penasthika, Priskila Pratita. “Relevansi the HCCH 1965 Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters Untuk Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5. No. 2 (Desember 2024). Hlm. 1121-1135.
Radvan, Martin. “The Hague Convention on Taking of Evidence Abroad Civil or Commercial Matters: Several Notes concerning Its Scope, Methods and Compulsion”. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 16. No. 5 (1984). Hlm. 1031-1060.
Ristau, Bruno A. “Overview of International Judicial Assistance”. International Lawyer 18. No. 3 (1984). Hlm. 525-532.
Sutherland, P.F. “The Use of the Letter of Request (Or Letter Rogatory) for the Purpose of Obtaining Evidence for Proceedings in England and Abroad”. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 31. No. 4 (Oktober 1982). Hlm. 784-839.
“The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters: The Exclusive and Mandatory Procedures for Discovery Abroad”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132. No. 6 (Juli 1984). Hlm. 1461-1485.
Wilks, William L. and Goldberg, Nancy E. “The Unsolved Problem in Taking Evidence Abroad: The Non-Rule of Aerospatiale”. Dickinson Journal of International Law 7. No. 1 (1988). Hlm. 65-93.
Williams, Riley A. “Videoconferencing: Not A Foreign Language to International Courts”. Oklahoma Journal of Law and Technology 7 (2011). Hlm. 1-23.
Buku
Gautama, Sudargo. Indonesia dan Konvensi-Konvensi Hukum Perdata Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1993.
Pramono, Heru. Rogatori (Bantuan Teknis Hukum dalam Perkara Perdata Lintas Negara) Teori, Praktik, dan Arah Pembaruannya. Jakarta: Prenada, 2025.
Szászy, István. International Civil Procedure. Leiden: AW Sijthoff, 1967.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law. HCCH Evidence Handbook – Practical Handbook on the Operation of the 1970 Evidence Convention. The Hague: HCCH, 2025.
van Loon, Hans. “At the Cross-roads of Public and Private International Law – The Hague Conference on Private International Law and Its Work” dalam Collected Courses of the Xiamen Academy of International Law. Volume 11. Brill, 2017.
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1982 tentang Pengesahan Konvensi Wina Mengenai Hubungan Diplomatik Beserta Protokol Opsionalnya Mengenai Hal Memperoleh Kewarganegaraan (Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Optional Protocol to The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Concerning Acquisition of Nationality, 1961) dan Pengesahan Konvensi Wina Mengenai Hubungan Konsuler Beserta Protokol Opsionalnya mengenai Hal Memperoleh Kewarganegaraan (Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and Optional Protocol to The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations Concerning Acquisition of Nationality, 1963). LN Tahun 1982 No. 2 TLN No. 3211.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2006 tentang Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana. LN Tahun 2006 No.18 TLN No. 4607.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perjanjian Internasional. LN Tahun 2000 No.185 TLN No. 4012.
Keputusan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 1978 tentang Mengesahkan "Persetujuan Kerjasama di Bidang Peradilan Antara Republik Indonesia dan Kerajaan Thailand", yang Telah ditandatangani di Bangkok oleh Delegasi Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Delegasi Pemerintah Kerajaan Thailand, Pada Tanggal 8 Maret 1978. LN Tahun 1978 No. 17.
Nota Kesepahaman Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia dan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia tentang Penanganan Permintaan Bantuan Teknis Hukum dan Masalah Perdata Lintas Negara Nomor PRJ/HK/00001/04/2023/22–02/KMA/NK/IV/2023. April 2023.
Perjanjian Internasional
Agreement on Judicial Cooperation between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of Thailand 1978.
Convention du 17 juillet 1905 Relative à la Procédure Civile (disepakati 17 Juli 1905, mulai berlaku 26 April 1909). 286 UNTS 265.
Convention of 1 March 1954 on Civil Procedure (disepakati 1 Maret 1954, mulai berlaku 12 April 1957). 286 UNTS 265.
Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (disepakati 18 Maret 1970, mulai berlaku 7 Oktober 1972). 847 UNTS 231.
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (diadopsi di Vienna 22 April 1963, mulai berlaku 19 March 1967). 596 UNTS 261.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (disepakati di Vienna pada 23 Mei 1969, mulai berlaku 27 Januari 1980). 1155 UNTS 331.
Dokumen Organisasi Internasional
Amram, Ph. W. Explanatory Report on the Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law, HCCH Special Commission. Conclusions and Recommendations on 1965 Service Convention, 1970 Evidence Convention, and 1980 Access to Justice Convention. Juli 2024.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Rapport de la Commission spéciale établi par (Report of the Special Commission) P.W Amram, Preliminary Document number 3 of August 1968, in Actes et documents de la Onzième session (1968), Tome IV, Obtention des preuves à l’étranger, The Hague: Imprimerie Nationale, 1970.
Artikel pada Media Internet
Bernasconi, Christophe. “The Hague Conference on Private International Law”, The Holland Times. Edisi 5. Juli 2025. Tersedia pada https://www.hollandtimes.nl/2025-edition-5-july/the-hague-conference-on-private-international-law-hcch/. Diakses 22 Februari 2026.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. “BPHN Tekankan Urgensi dan Manfaat Pengesahan Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Tersedia pada https://bphn.go.id/berita-utama/bphn-tekankan-urgensi-dan-manfaat-pengesahan-statute-of-the-hague-conference-on-private-international-law-hcch. Diakses 22 Februari 2026.
Cornell Law School – Legal Information Institute, “Pretrial Discovery”. Tersedia pada https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/pretrial_discovery. Diakses 6 Maret 2026.
Mahkamah Agung. “Kepala BUA Pimpin Delegasi Mahkamah Agung RI dalam Kunjungan Kerja ke Belanda”. Tersedia pada https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/berita/7177/kepala-bua-pimpin-delegasi-mahkamah-agung-ri-dalam-kunjungan-kerja-ke-belanda. Diakses 22 Februari 2026.
Nursobah, Asep. “Prosedur Penyampaian Bantuan Teknis Hukum dalam Perkara Perdata Lintas Negara”. Khazanah Pemikiran Hukum. 27 Oktober 2025. Tersedia pada https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/2627-prosedur-penyampaian-bantuan-teknis-hukum-dalam-perkara-perdata-lintas-negara-berdasarkan-nota-kesepahaman-ma-dan-kemlu-tahun-2023-asep-nursobah. Diakses 10 Maret 2026.
Penasthika, Priskila Pratita. “The Hague Conference on Private International Law dan Kepentingan Indonesia”. Hukumonline.com. 25 Agustus 2023. Tersedia pada https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/the-hague-conference-on-private-international-law-dan-kepentingan-indonesia-lt64e8146302c40/. Diakses 22 Februari 2026.
United Nations Treaty Collection. “Glossary”. Tersedia pada https://treaties.un.org/pages/overview.aspx?path=overview/glossary/page1_en.xml#declarations. Diakses 18 Maret 2026.
Recommended Citation
Penasthika, Priskila Pratita
(2026)
"Mengenal HCCH 1970 Taking Evidence Abroad Convention,"
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 56:
No.
3, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol56.no.3.3720
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol56/iss3/1
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Air and Space Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Election Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons