•  
  •  
 

DOI

10.21143/jhp.vol.48.no.1.1597

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court has no jurisprudence related to the application of proportionality test. In comparative law perspective, proportionality test is referred to as "the ultimate rule of law”. This study aims to provide a consideration to the possibility of applying proportionality test when the Constitutional Court needs to deals with the issue of political parties dissolution. In countries that have examined cases of political parties dissolution, the proportionality test is a method of legal reasoning to reach the decision. This studyis conducted by comparing verdicts from national and regional courts, which have dealt with the dissolution of political parties and applying proportionality test.

Bahasa Abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi belum memiliki yurisprudensi yang berkaitan dengan penerapan uji proposionalitas. Dalam konteks perbandingan hukum, uji proporsionalitas disebut sebagai “the ultimate rule of law”. Kajian ini bermaksud untuk memberi pertimbangan mengenai kemungkinan penerapan uji proporsionalitas bilamana Mahkamah Konstitusi menghadapi persoalan pembubaran partai politik. Di beberapa negara yang pernah menangani kasus pembubaran partai politik, uji proporsionalitas merupakan salah satu metode penalaran dalam memutus perkara ini. Pendekatan kajian ini dilakukan dengan cara perbandingan dengan melihat putusan pada beberapa yurisdiksi, baik pada tingkat pengadilan regional maupun pengadilan nasional, yang pernah menangani pembubaran partai politik dengan menerapkan uji proporsionalitas

References

Buku Aharon Barak, Proportionality, Constitutional Rights and their Limitations, terj. Doron Kalir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. David Dyzenhaus, Legality And Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen And Herman Heller in Weimar, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. David M. Beatty, The Ultimate Rule Of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 J.H. Jans, S. Prechal, R.J.G.M. Widdershoven (eds.), Europeanisation of Public Law, 2nd. Europa Law Publishing, 2015. Jarna Petman, “Human Rights Between Sovereign Will and International Standards: A Comment” dalam Venice Commission, “Definition of Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty in Europe”, Council of Europe Publishing, Science and Technology of Democracy No. 49, 2001. John Rawls, A Theory Of Justice, Edisi Revisi, Massachussets: The Belknapp Press, 1999. Juergen Schwarze, European Administrative Law, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1992. Muchamad Ali Safa’at, Pembubaran Partai Politik: Pengaturan dan Praktik Pembubaran Partai Politik dalam Pergulatan Republik, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011. Lorraine Weinrib,The Postwar Paradigm And American Exceptionalism, dalam Sujit Choudhry (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Robert Alexy, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, terj. Julian Rivers, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 Artikel Alec Stone Sweet dan Jud Mathews, “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 47., 2008. 68-149. Bernhard Schlink, “Proportionality In Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere But Here?”, Duke Journal Of Comparative Law And International Law, Vol. 22, 2012. 291-302 Bulent Algan, “Dissolution of Political Parties by the Constitutional Court in Turkey: An Everlasting Conflict Between the Court and the Parliament?”, Ankara Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2011. 809-836. Carl A. Auerbach, “The Communist Control Act of 1954: A Proposed Legal-Political Theory of Free Speech”, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 23, Issue 2. 1956. 173-220 David Dyzenhaus, Constituting the Enemy: A Response to Carl Schmitt, dalam Andras Sajo (ed.), Militant Democracy, the Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2004. David Schilling, “European Islamaphobia and Turkey –Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) v. Turkey”, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 26, Issue 3, 2014. 501-515. Dieter Grimm, “Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence”, University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2. 2007. 383-397. Eduardo Vírgala Foruria, “The Banning of Political Parties in Spain (the Batasuna Case)”, Revista Ballot, Vol. 1 No. 1, Maio/Agosto 2015. 1-20 Edward McWinney, “The German Federal Constitutional Court and the Communist Party Decision”Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 1957. 295-312. Feyzan Ozbay, “A Comparative Study on the Criteria Applied to the Dissolution of Political Parties by the Turkish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights”, Human Rights Review, Vol. 5, Issue 9, June 2015, 1-19. Georg Nolte, “Thin or Thick? The Principle of Proportionality and International Humanitarian Law”, Law and Ethics of Human Rights, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 2010. 244-255. Gregoire C.N. Weber, “Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 23, Issue 1, January 2010. 179-202. Gur Bligh, “Defending Democracy: A New Understanding of the Party-Banning Phenomenon”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 46, 2013. 1321-1379 Heikki ES Mattila, “Cross-References in Court Decisions: A Study in Comparative Legal Linguistics”, dalam Tarja Salmi-Tolonen, Iris Tukianen dan Richard Foley (eds), “Law and Language in Partnership and Conflict”, Lapland Law Review (Special Issue) , Vol. 1, No. 1, 2011. 96-121. James M. West dan Dae-Kyu Yoon, “The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex?”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 40, Issue 1, January 1992. 73-119. Jed Rubenfeld, “Commentary: Unilateralism And Constitutionalism”, New York University Law Review, Vol.79 No. 6, Desember 2004, 1971-2028. Jibong Lim, “A Comparative Study of the Constitutional Adjudication Systems of the U.S, Germany and Korea”, Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, Vol. 6 Issue 2, 1999. 123-162 Karl Loewenstein, “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1937. 417-432. -----------------------, “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights ll”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1937. 638-658. Kevin Boyle, “Human Rights, Religion and Democracy: The Refah Party Case”, Essex Human Rights Review, Vol. 1, No.1, Juli 2004. 1-16. Moshe Cohen-Eliya dan Iddo Porat, “American Balancing And German Proportionality: The Historical Origins”, International Journal Of Constitutional Law, Volume 8, Issue 2, 1 April 2010. 263-286. Paul Franz, “Unconstitutional And Outlawed Political Parties: A German-American Comparison”, Boston College International And Comparative Law Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, 1982. 51-89. Robert Alexy, “Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation”, Ricerche, Giuridiche, Vol. 3 No. 3, Desember 2014. 197-209 Steven Greer, “’Balancing’ and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate”, The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 63, Issue 2, Juni 2004. 412-434. Sungjin Kim, “Dissolution of Political Party: Criteria Adopted by the Korean Constitutional Court and Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights”, Journal of Korean Law, Vol. 15, Juni 2016. 297-323 Thomas Alexander Aleinikoff, “Constitutional Law in The Age of Balancing”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 5, April 1987. 943-1005. Thomas M. Franck, “Proportionality In International Law”, Law and Ethics of Human Rights, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 2010. 231-242. Zuhtu Arslan, “Conflicting Paradigms: Political Rights in the Turkish Constitutional Court”, Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2002. 9-25. Peraturan dan Putusan Peradilan Dewan Ekonomi dan Sosial PBB, Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN Doc E/CN 4/1984/4, tahun 1984, General Comment Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia PBB No 22, tahun 1992. General Comment Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia PBB, No 10 tahun 1983. Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia (LNRI) Tahun 2008 Nomor 2, Tambahan Lembaran Negara (TLN) Nomor 4801, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Turkey: Recent Developments, Resolusi 1622 (2008), Risalah Sidang sessi ke-26 pada tanggal 26 Juni 2008, Dokumen no. 11660. Putusan Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia Eropa, Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey (application no. 23885/94). -----------------------, Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. Turkey (application nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98, and 41344/98), diputus pada tanggal 13 Februari 2003. -----------------------, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey (133/1996/752/951). -----------------------, Halkın Demokrasi Partisi (HADEP) and Demir v. Turkey (application no. 28003/03). -----------------------, Herri Batasuna and Batasuna v. Spain (application nos.25803/04 and 25817/04), Etxeberría and Others v. Spain (nos. 35579/03, 35613/03, 35626/03 and 35634/03 and Herritarren Zerrenda v. Spain (no. 43518/04). -----------------------, Party for a Democratic Society (DTP) and Others v. Turkey (applications nos. 3870/10, 3870/10, 3878/10, 15616/10, 21919/10, 39118/10 and 37272/10) diputus tanggal 12 Januari 2016 -----------------------, Yazar, Karataş, Aksoy and the People’s Labour Party (HEP) v. Turkey (Applications nos. 22723/93, 22724/93 and 22725/93). -----------------------, Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey (20/1997/804/1007). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Jerman, [Kamar Kedua (Second Senate)] Nomor 2 BvB 1/01 diputus pada tanggal 18 Maret 2003. -----------------------, [Kamar Kedua (Second Senate)] Nomor 2 BvB 1/13 diputus pada tanggal 7 Januari 2017. -----------------------, Nomor 2 BverfG, diputus pada tanggal 23 Oktober 1952. -----------------------, Nomor 34 BVerfGE 238, diputus pada tanggal 31 Januari 1973. -----------------------, Nomor 5 BverfG 85, diputus tanggal 17 Agustus 1956. -----------------------, Nomor 7 BVerfGE 377, diputus pada tanggal 11 Juni 1958. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat, Dennis v. United States, 341 US 494 (1951). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Kanada dalam kasus R v Oakes, [1986] 1 SCR 103 Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Korea Selatan Nomor 2013Hun-Da1, diputus pada 19 Desember 2014. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Turki Nomor K: 2009/4 tanggal 11 Desember 2009, dimuat dalam Lembaran Resmi Negara tanggal 31 Desember 2009 No. 27449. Turki, Undang-Undang mengenai Partai Politik (Act of Political Parties) No. 2820, diterbitkan pada 22 April 1983, dimuat dalam Lembaran Resmi Negara tanggal 24 April 1983 No. 18027. Venice Commission, “Guidelines on Prohibition and Dissolution of Political Parties and Analogoues Measures”, yang diadopsi melalui sessi pleno ke 41 Venice Commission pada tanggal 10-11 Desember 1999.

Download

Share

COinS