Abstract
Pemenuhan akan pangan merupakan komponen dasar untuk mewujudkan sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas. Namun, masih terdapat permasalahan dalam mewujudkannya, di antaranya masalah keamanan pangan dengan persentase kasus keracunan makanan masih tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis situasi pelaksanaan keamanan Pangan Jajanan Anak Sekolah (PJAS) yang ada saat ini dan memilih alternatif model keamanan pangan yang paling efektif dan efisien diterapkan di usaha mikro kecil (UMK) guna meningkatkan keamanan pangan yang dihasilkannya sehingga terjadi peningkatan kesehatan anak. Penelitian dilakukan pada kuartal II tahun 2015 sampai dengan awal kuartal III tahun 2015 melalui survei lapangan dan survei pakar dengan mengambil studi kasus di lingkungan sekolah dasar. Survei lapangan melibatkan 102 responden untuk memungkinkan dilakukannya analisis situasional dan juga survei pakar untuk memilih model keamanan pangan yang paling efektif dan efisien untuk diterapkan pada UMK PJAS dengan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Hasil survei lapangan menunjukkan 91% responden anak sekolah pernah mengalami gangguan kesehatan setelah mengonsumsi PJAS. Selain itu, 100% responden UMK PJAS tidak menggunakan masker dan sarung tangan sebelum mengolah makanan/minuman, 62% masih menggunakan air sumur sebagai sumber air untuk produksi PJAS dan 86% menggunakan Bahan Tambahan Pangan. Hasil survei pakar menunjukkan model Lima Kunci Pangan Aman terpilih sebagai model keamanan pangan yang paling efektif dan efisien diterapkan pada UMK PJAS. Food is the most important basic human need, in which it’s fulfillment becomes major component of human right to embody qualified human resources in Indonesia. However, there have been some problems to embody it, such as food safety problem with percentage of foodborne ilness case that remains high. This study aimed to analyze the situation of Street Food for School Children (SFSC) safety practice nowadays and select the most effective and efficient food safety model alternative implemented on Micro and Small Enterprises (MSE) in order to improve food safety performance, so child health improvement may occur. This study was conducted in the second quarter until the early third quarter of 2015 through field survey and expert survey by taking case study in elementary school environment. Field survey involved 102 respondents was conducted to enable situational analysis and expert survey was conducted to select the most effective and efficient food safety model implemented in SFSC MSE with Analytical Hierarchy Process. Field survey results showed 91% school child respondents ever suffered from health disorders after consuming SFSC. Moreover, 100% SFSC MSE respondents did not wear masks nor gloves before producing food/beverage, 62% still used nearby well water as water source for SFSC production and 86% used Food Additives. Expert survey results showed Five Keys to Safer Food model selected as the most effective and efficient food safety model implemented in SFSC MSE.
References
1. Hariyadi P. Pangan dan daya saing bangsa, upaya peningkatan keamanan, mutu dan gizi pangan melalui ilmu dan teknologi. Bogor: Southeast Asian Food Science & Technology (SEAFAST) Center, IPB; 2007.
2. Fielding L, Ellis L, Clayton D, Peters A. An evaluation of process specific information resources, aimed at hazard analysis, in small and medium enterprises in food manufacturing. Food Control. 2011; 22: 1171- 7.
3. Kristianto Y, Riyadi BD, Mustafa A. Faktor determinan pemilihan makanan jajanan pada siswa sekolah dasar. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2013; 7(11): 489-94.
4. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. Rencana Aksi Nasional: Gerakan menuju pangan jajanan anak sekolah yang aman, bermutu, dan bergizi. Jakarta: Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia; 2011.
5. Dora M, Kumar M, Van Goubergen D, Molnar A, Gellynck X. Food quality management system: reviewing assessment strategies and a feasiibility study for European food small and medium-sized enterprises. Food Control. 2013; 31: 607-16.
6. Ainuri M. Nilai ekonomi modal sosial sebagai media rekayasa difusi teknologi pada sentra industri pangan skala kecil. Agritech. 2009; 29 (4): 209-2.
7. Wibawa A. Faktor penentu kontaminasi bakteriologik pada makanan jajanan di sekolah dasar. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2008; 3 (1): 3-8.
8. Syah D, Ghaisani M, Suratmono, Sparringa RA, Palupi NS. Akar masalah keamanan pangan jajanan anak sekolah: sudi kasus pada bakso, makanan ringan, dan mi. Jurnal Mutu Pangan. 2015; 2 (1): 18-25.
9. Rina A. Sistem manajemen mutu dan keamanan pangan pada perusahaan jasa boga. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2008; 2 (6): 263-72.
10. Checkland P. Soft system methodology: a thirty year retrospective. System Research and Behavioral Science. 2000; 17: S1-58.
11. Eriyatno, Larasati L. Ilmu sistem: meningkatkan integrasi dan koordinasi manajemen. Edisi ke-4. Surabaya: Guna Widya; 2012.
12. Saaty TL. Priority setting in complex problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1983; EM 30 (3): 140-55.
13. Marimin, Maghfiroh N. Aplikasi teknik pengambilan keputusan dalam manajemen rantai pasok. Bogor: IPB Press; 2010.
14. Soon JM, Baines RN. Food safety training and evaluation of handwashing intention among fresh produce farm workers. Food Control. 2012; 23: 437-8.
15. Sujaya IN, Aryantini NPD, Nursini NW, Purnama SG, Dwipayanti NMU, Artawan IG. Identifikasi penyebab diare di Kabupaten Karangasem, Bali. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2010; 4(4): 186-92.
16. Pang F, Toh PS. Hawker food industry: food safety/public health strategies in Malaysia. Nutrition and Food Science. 2008; 38 (1): 41-51.
17. Singh RK. Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Measuring Business Excellence. 2013; 17(1): 80-98.
18. DiMaggio PJ, Powel WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collectivity rationality in organizational field. American Sociological Review. 1983; 48: 147-60.
19. Ball B, Wilcock A, Aung M. Factors influencing workers to follow food safety management systems inmeat plants in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2009; 19 (3): 201–18.
20. Rahayu WP, Nababan H, Hariyadi P, Novinar. Keamanan pangan dalam rangka peningkatan daya saing usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah untuk penguatan ekonomi nasional. Conference Paper. Jakarta: Widyakarya Nasional Pangan dan Gizi X; 2012.
21. Yapp C, Fairman R. Factors affecting food safety complience within small and medium-sized enterprises: implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control. 2006; 17: 42-51.
22. Yasuda T. Food safety regulation in the United States: an empirical and theoritical examination. The Independent Review. 2010; 15 (2): 201-26.
23. World Health Organization. Five keys to safer food manual [online]. Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Desease. Geneva: WHO Press; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/ foodsafety/publications/consumer/manual_keys.pdf.
Recommended Citation
Safari A , Machfud M , Eriyatno E ,
et al.
Child Health Improvement through Implementation of Food Safety Model.
Kesmas.
2016;
10(4):
169-176
DOI: 10.21109/kesmas.v10i4.690
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/kesmas/vol10/iss4/5
Included in
Biostatistics Commons, Environmental Public Health Commons, Epidemiology Commons, Health Policy Commons, Health Services Research Commons, Nutrition Commons, Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene Commons, Public Health Education and Promotion Commons, Women's Health Commons