Abstract
The deradicalization program arises because of the Indonesian government's anxiety or concern about the increasing number of understandings of radicalism and acts of terrorism that occur during society. The government chose to use a soft approach in the deradicalization program because they believed it could effectively rehabilitate former terrorist groups and their families from a radical mindset. The government hopes to live a peaceful life with the people in their neighborhood and will not repeat the acts of terror they have previously committed or become agents of radicalism. This study uses a qualitative method. The qualitative method will end in relevant conclusions, especially in the social and political fields, because of their complexity. The results of this study Efficient rehabilitation requires individual evaluation, systematic planning, and effectiveness benchmarks that we can look at in the preparation, implementation, and follow-up steps. The participation of convicts and facilitators, the availability of training methods and materials, and evaluation of the success of rehabilitation are part of the rehabilitation method.
References
Ali, M. (2012). Hukum Pidana Terorisme dan Praktik. Jakarta: Gramata Publishing
Abdullah Ahmed an-Na’im, Dekonstruksi Syariah, Yogyakarta, LKiS, 1994, hlm. 338.
Febriyansah, M. N., Khodriah, L., & Kusuma, R. (2017). Upaya Deradikalisasi Narapidana Terorisme di Lembaga
Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Kedung Pane Semarang. Jurnal FakultasHukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 3(1), 91–108.
Golose, P. R. (2009). Deradikalisasi Terorisme Humanis, Soul Approach dan Menyentuh Akar Rumput. Jakarta. Jakarta: Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian.
Henry J. Steiner, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politic, Moral, Text and Material, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, hlm. 102.
Ismail Hasani dan Bonar Tigor Naipospos (ed), Op. Cit, hlm. 169.
International Crisis Groeup, Deradikalisasi dan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia, Asia Report N°142 – 19 November 2007, Hlm.1.
ICSR, “Prisons and Terrorism Radicalisation and Deradicalisation in 15 Countries” King’s College London United Kingdom, 2010, hlm. 12.
Mulyoto, G. P., & Mulyono, G. P. (2017). Radikalisme agama di Indonesia (ditinjau dari sudut pandang sosiologi kewarganegaraan). Jurnal Citizenship, 5(1), 64–74.
Muhammad Harfin Zuhdi, Fundamentalisme dan Upaya Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Al- Qur’an Dan Hadis, RELIGIAVol. 13, No. 1, April 2010, hlm. 91
Nasir Abas, Membongkar Jamaah Islamiyah: Pengakuan Mantan Anggota JI, Jakarta, Penerbit Grafindo Khazanah Ilmu, 2005.
Rohman, Syaiful & Nurhasanah, Siti (2019). Paham Radikalisme Berdasarkan Perspektif Agama (Radicalism Based On Religious Perspective), Journal of Terrorism Studies, Volume 1, No. 1 2019.
SETARA Institute for Democracy and Peace. (2012). Dari Radikalisme Menuju Terorisme: Studi Relasi dan Transformasi Organisasi Islam Radikal di Jawa Tengah dan D.I. Yogyakarta. Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.
Saefudin Zuhri, Deradikalisasi Terorisme, Daulatpress, Jakarta, 2017, hlm. 103.
Sarlito Wirawan Sarwono, Terorisme di Indonesia dalam Tinjauan Psikologi, Jakarta, Pustaka Alvabet, 2012, hlm. 44.
Mulyoto, G. P., & Mulyono, G. P. (2017). Radikalisme agama di Indonesia (ditinjau dari sudut pandang sosiologi kewarganegaraan). Jurnal Citizenship, 5(1), 64–74. Terrorism Research, 6(2), 36–56.
Said Aqiel Siradj, Tasawuf Sebagai Kritik Sosial Mengedepankan Islam Sebagai Inspirasi Bukan Aspirasi, Bandung, Penerbit Mizan, 2006, hlm. 157.
Usman. (2014). Model Deradikalisasi Narapidana Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Deradikalisasi Di Yaman, Arab Saudi, Singapura, Mesir Dan Indonesia. Jurnal Inovatif, VII(II), 1–16.
Recommended Citation
sirait, osbenardus; Syauqillah, Muhamad; and Hanita, Margaretha
(2021)
"DERADICALIZATION PROGRAM IN INDONESIA,"
Journal of Terrorism Studies: Vol. 3:
No.
2, Article 6.
DOI: 10.7454/jts.v3i2.1040
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jts/vol3/iss2/6