•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: Port-wine stains (PWS), or capillary malformations (CM), are congenital vascular anomalies characterized by gradual enlargement of the superficial cutaneous vascular plexus, leading to low-flow malformations in the skin. Laser therapy remains the preferred treatment for PWS. The 577-nm vascular laser system is particularly suited for treating cutaneous vascular disorders. This study evaluates the efficacy of the 577-nm vascular laser for both superficial and deep PWS lesions.

Case Illustration: Three adult patients, all aged over 17 years old, were trseated with the 577-nm laser. In the first case with deeper PWS, four treatment sessions resulted in flattening of hypertrophic areas, leaving residual red patches. In the second case, complete clearance of the PWS was achieved after eight treatment sessions. In the third case, additional treatment with the 577-nm laser was administered after a device targeting deeper vascular structures was employed.

Discussion: The 577-nm vascular laser is safe for use in dark-skinned patients, with a short downtime and low risk of scarring and post-inflammatory erythema. For lesions deeper than 0.8 mm, other treatment modalities should be considered. Early intervention can help prevent the development of hypertrophic or nodular components. Multiple 577-nm laser sessions can minimize progression and provide significant improvement. Treatment success depends on clinical conditions, appropriate laser parameters, and timing.

Conclusion: The 577-nm vascular laser is effective and safe for treating PWS, particularly in dark-skinned individuals. Early intervention and multiple sessions are the key to preventing progression and achieving optimal results. Deeper lesions may require alternative laser modalities.

References

  1. Buch J, Karagaiah P, Raviprakash P, et al. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques of port wine stain. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(7):2006–14.
  2. Lederhandler MH, Pomerantz H, Orbuch D, Geronemus RG. Treating pediatric port-wine stains in aesthetics. Clin Dermatol. 2022;40(1):11–8.
  3. Nguyen V, Hochman M, Mihm MC, Nelson JS, Tan W. The pathogenesis of port wine stain and sturge weber syndrome: Complex interactions between genetic alterations and aberrant MAPK and PI3K activation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):1–17.
  4. Sabeti S, Ball KL, Burkhart C, et al. Consensus statement for the management and treatment of port-wine birthmarks in sturge-weber syndrome. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):98–104.
  5. Garden BC, Garden JM, Goldberg DJ. Light-based devices in the treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions: An updated review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(3):296–302.
  6. Brightman LA, Geronemus RG, Reddy KK. Laser treatment of port-wine stains. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:27–33.
  7. Kapicioglu Y, Sarac G, Cenk H. Treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, facial erythema, and facial telangiectasia with a 577-nm pro-yellow laser: a case series. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(1):93–8.
  8. Sarac G, Kapicioglu Y. Efficacy of 577-nm Pro-Yellow laser in port wine stain treatment. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(6):1–6.
  9. Ataseven A, Temiz SA, Özer İ. An Investigation of the effectiveness of the 577- nm pro-yellow laser in patients with vascular disorders. Eur J Ther. 2023;29:49–54.
  10. Lee JW, Chung HY, Cerrati EW, O TM, Waner M. The natural history of soft tissue hypertrophy, bony hypertrophy, and nodule formation in patients with untreated head and neck capillary malformations. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(11):1241–5.
  11. Lekwuttikarn R, Pimsiri A, Somsak T. Long-term follow-up outcomes of laser-treated port wine stain patients: A double-blinded retrospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(8):2246–51.
  12. Li D, Wu WJ, Li K, et al. Wavelength optimization for the laser treatment of port wine stains. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(4):2165–78.
  13. Tan OT, Morrison P, Kurban AK. 585 nm for the treatment of port-wine stains. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:1112–7.
  14. Patil UA. Application of lasers in vascular anomalies. Indian J Plast Surg. 2023;56(5):395–404.
  15. Yu W, Zhu J, Gu Y, et al. Port-wine stains on the neck respond better to a pulsed dye laser than lesions on the face: An intrapatient comparison study with histopathology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(3):779–81.
  16. Yu W, Ma G, Qiu Y, et al. Why do port-wine stains (PWS) on the lateral face respond better to pulsed dye laser (PDL) than those located on the central face? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(3):527–35.
  17. Fu Z, Huang J, Xiang Y, et al. Characterization of laser-resistant port wine stain blood vessels using In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51(10):841–9.
  18. Van Gemert MJ, Smithies DJ, Verkruysse W, Milner TE, Nelson JS. Wavelengths for port wine stain laser treatment: Influence of vessel radius and skin anatomy. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(1):41–50.
  19. Waelchli R, Aylett SE, Robinson K, Chong WK, Martinez AE, Kinsler VA. New vascular classification of port-wine stains: Improving prediction of sturge-weber risk. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(4):861–7.
  20. Fusano M, Bencini PL, Toffanetti JN, Galimberti MG. Time interval between pulse dye laser treatments of port-wine stains: 30 years of experience. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2023;25(1–4):33–7.
  21. Yu W, Ma G, Qiu Y, et al. Prospective comparison treatment of 595-nm pulsed-dye lasers for virgin port-wine stain. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(3):684–91.
  22. Jeon H, Bernstein LJ, Belkin DA, Ghalili S, Geronemus RG. Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in infancy without the need for general anesthesia. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(4):435–41.
  23. Bajaj S, Tao J, Hashemi DA, Geronemus RG. Weekly pulsed dye laser treatments for port-wine birthmarks in infants. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(6):606–11

Download

Share

COinS