•  
  •  
 

Legal Implications of the Mauritius v Maldives Case on the Delimitation of Archipelagic States

Abstract

Maritime boundary delimitation is a complex field of international law characterised by uncertainty and unpredictability. Historically, States have relied on case law to develop and elaborate the ambiguous provisions stipulated under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning maritime boundary delimitation. However, case law related to the maritime delimitation of archipelagic States is limited, leading to conflicting interpretations of the basic principles of maritime delimitation in the context of archipelagic States. This paper aims to examine the legal implications of the latest Mauritius v Maldives case on the maritime boundary delimitation of archipelagic States. The research methodology employed for this study consists of a comprehensive literature review and in-depth analysis of the relevant cases. The paper finds that despite the Mauritius v Maldives case clarifying some of the key complications faced by archipelagic States, the case has ultimately added to the confusion owing to the Special Chamber’s approach concerning the allocation of half effect to Bleinheim Reef in the second stage of the delimitation process. The paper concludes that although further elucidation of the maritime delimitation law in the context of archipelagic States is required, any new jurisprudence should prioritise clarity, transparency, and consistency in the delimitation process, particularly in relation to the selection of base points and the effect given to insular features.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Journal Articles and Periodicals

Agusman, Damos. “Adjudicators, Negotiators and the Evolution of Maritime Delimitation Law: Indonesia’s Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 112:285–88. Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26628140.

Baumert, Kevin, and Brian Melchior. “The Practice of Archipelagic States: A Study of Studies.” Ocean Development and International Law 46, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2015.995970.

Beazley, P.B. “Reefs and the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea.” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 6, no. 4 (1991): 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529991X00162.

Bu, Lingjia. “The Role of Low-Tide Elevations in Maritime Delimitation Cases.” Ocean Development & International Law 55, no. 1–2 (April 2, 2024): 137–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2024.2336561.

Charney, Jonathan I. “Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law.” The American Journal of International Law 88, no. 2 (1994): 227–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2204098.

Davenport, Tara. “Southeast Asian Approaches to Maritime Boundaries.” Asian Journal of International Law 4, no. 2 (July 2014): 309–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251313000313.

Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. “The Principle That the Land Dominates the Sea in the Context of South China Sea Disputes: A Critical Appraisal.” IIUM Law Journal 30, no. 2 (2022): 50–75.

Kopela, Sophia. “2007 Archipelagic Legislation of the Dominican Republic: An Assessment.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 24, no. 3 (September 1, 2009): 501–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180809X455593.

Kwiatkowska, Barbara. “The Qatar v. Bahrain Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Case.” Ocean Development & International Law 33, no. 3–4 (July 2002): 227–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320290054783.

Llanos, Hugo Ignacio. “Low-Tide Elevations: Reassessing Their Impact on Maritime Delimitation.” Pace International Law Review 14 (2002): 19.

Miron, Alina. “The Archipelagic Status Reconsidered in Light of the South China Sea and Düzgit Integrity Awards.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 3 (July 31, 2018): 306–40. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.3.729.

Nurbintoro, Gulardi. “International Tribunals Approach Toward Maritime Boundaries Delimitation of an Archipelagic State.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 21, no. 2 (2024): 255–80.

Østhagen, Andreas. “Troubled Seas? The Changing Politics of Maritime Boundary Disputes.” Ocean & Coastal Management 205 (May 2021): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105535.

Oxman, Bernard H. “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Seventh Session (1978).” The American Journal of International Law 73, no. 1 (1979): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2201296.

Qureshi, Waseem Ahmad. “State Practices of Straight Baselines Institute Excessive Maritime Claims.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 42 (2018): 421–50. https://law.siu.edu/_common/documents/law-journal/articles-2018/spring-2018/6-qureshi-sm.pdf.

Ramon, Adrianus Adityo Vito. “Completing the Jigsaw: The Recent Development of the Maritime Boundaries in the Timor Sea.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 4 (July 31, 2018): 481–522. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.4.737.

Schofield, Clive. “Options for Overcoming Overlapping Maritime Claims.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 8, no. 2 (2021): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/48617339.

Tanaka, Yoshifumi. “Low-Tide Elevations in International Law of the Sea: Selected Issues.” Ocean Yearbook Online 20, no. 1 (2006): 189–219. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-90000121.

———. “Recent Developments in the Jurisprudence Concerning the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Analysis of the Mauritius/Maldives and Nicaragua v. Colombia Cases.” International Law Studies 103 (2024): 73–111.

Woker, Hilde, and Leonardo Bernard. “A New Constraint to the Entitlement of a Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles? – Implications of the Recent Case Law.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, August 16, 2024, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10193.

Books and Book Chapters

Anderson, David. Modern Law of The Sea: Selected Essays. Vol. 59. Publications on Ocean Development. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.

Churchill, Robin R., Alan V. Lowe, and Amy Sander. The Law of the Sea. 4th ed. Melland Schill Studies in International Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022.

Colson, David A. “Bahrain-Qatar (2001) [Report Number 7-13].” In International Maritime Boundaries, edited by Jonathan L. Charney and Robert W. Smith, Vol IV:2841-2860., 2002. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/MBOO/IMBO-Book-7_17.xml#Book.

Fietta, Stephen, and Robin Cleverly. A Practitioner’s Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Lando, Massimo. Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608893.

Prescott, Victor, and Clive Schofield. The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World. 2nd ed. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.

Proelss, Alexander, Amber Rose Maggio, Eike Blitza, and Oliver Daum, eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary. München, Oxford, Baden-Baden, Germany: C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2017.

Roach, J. Ashley, and Robert W. Smith. Excessive Maritime Claims. 3rd ed. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.

Sohn, Louis B., Jonathan L. Charney, and Lewis M. Alexander. “Baseline Considerations.” In International Maritime Boundaries, 153–61, 1993. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/MBOO/IMBO-Book-i_6.xml?rskey=uncRqx&result=1.

Tanaka, Yoshifumi. Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation. Vol. 8. Studies in International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.

———. Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation. 2nd ed. Studies in International Law. Oxford, London, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Hart Publishing, 2019.

United Nations. Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea. Handbook on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries. New York: United Nations, 2000.

Yüksel, Umut. “Legal Uncertainty and the Making of Maritime Boundaries.” In Uncertainty in Global Politics, by Anastasia Shesterinina and Miriam Matejova, 101–16, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003426080-9.

Legal Documents

A Manual on Technical Aspects of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - 1982 (TALOS). 5th ed. Monaco: International Hydrographic Bureau, 2014.

Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of India, Award, Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), 7 July 2014.

Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), 1985 ICI Reports 13.

Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libya Arab Jamahiriya), 1982 ICJ Reports 18.

Delimitation of the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (2006). 45 ILM 800.

Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 4.

Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (28th April 2023) ITLOS Case No. 28.

Lathrop, Coalter G., J. Ashley Roach, and Donald R. Rothwell. “Baselines under the International Law of the Sea - Reports of the International Law Association Committee on Baselines under the International Law of the Sea.” Brill Research Perspectives in the Law of the Sea 2, no. 1–2 (February 7, 2019): 1–177. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519359-12340005.

Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain), 2001 ICJ Rep. 40.

Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2009, p. 61.

Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2021, p. 206.

Palau's Constitution of 1981 with Amendments through 1992, available at https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/pau132833.pdf.

Powers, Molly, and Malakai Vakautawale. “Pacific Maritime Zones Status Update (15th SPC Heads of Fisheries Meeting 20–24 March 2023).” Pacific Community, March 20, 2023. https://shorturl.at/I1Pui.

Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Judgment, 13 July 2023.

Republic of Maldives. “Counter-Memorial of the Republic of Maldives - Volume 1 - Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean.” Republic of Maldives, November 25, 2021. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/28/Merits_Pleadings/C28_Counter_memorial_of_Maldives.pdf.

———. “Rejoinder of the Republic of Maldives - Volume 1 - Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean.” Republic of Maldives, August 15, 2022. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/28/Merits_Pleadings/C28_Rejoinder_Maldives.pdf.

Republic of Mauritius. “Memorial of Mauritius - Volume 1 - Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean.” Republic of Mauritius, May 25, 2021. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/28/Merits_Pleadings/C28_Memorial_of_Mauritius.pdf.

———. “Reply of Mauritius - Volume 1 - Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean.” Republic of Mauritius, April 14, 2022. https://itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/28/Merits_Pleadings/C28_Reply_Mauritius.pdf.

The Anglo-French Continental Shelf Arbitration 1977, Vol XVIII RIAA 3, paras. 140–144.

The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award (UNCLOS Annex VII Arb. Trib. July 12, 2016).

The 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf (adopted on 29th April 1958, entered into force on 10th June 1964)

United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (adopted 10th December 1982, entered into force 16th November 1994) 1833 UNTS 397.

United States Department of State. “Limits in the Seas No. 130 - Dominican Republic, Archipelagic and Other Maritime Claims and Boundaries.” Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State, January 31, 2014.

———. “Limits in the Seas No. 131 - Trinidad and Tobago: Archipelagic and Other Maritime Claims and Boundaries.” Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State, January 31, 2014.

Web Sources

Brill. “International Maritime Boundaries Online.” Accessed November 24, 2024. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/db/mboo.

United Nations Treaty Collection. “Declarations and Reservations Made by States under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.” Accessed November 24, 2024. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en.

United Nations Treaty Collection. “Indonesia: Declaration under Article 298.” Accessed November 24, 2024. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2024/CN.114.2024-Eng.pdf.

Other Sources

Arsana, I Made Andi. “Challenges and Opportunities in the Delimitation of Indonesia’s Maritime Boundaries: A Legal and Technical Approach.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, 2014. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses.

Lokita, Sora. “The Role of the Archipelagic Baselines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation.” Thesis for the Fellowship Programme 2009 -2010, Nippon Foundation, 2010.

Paredes, Ricardo. “Analysis of the Legitimacy of the Declaration of the Dominican Republic as an Archipelagic State and Its Legality under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Law.” Thesis for the Fellowship Programme 2017-2018, Nippon Foundation, 2018.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS