"Law of Neutrality Applicable to Indonesia" by Arie Afriansyah and Hitoshi Nasu
  •  
  •  
 

Abstract

Tensions have heightened in the Indo-Pacific, with the People’s Republic of China engaging in aggressive behaviors in the South China Sea, confronting India in border disputes, and poising itself for a forcible unification of Taiwan in the midst of a great power competition with the United States. While the situation remains precarious, it is imperative for Indonesia to consider how it might position itself if a large-scale armed conflict erupted in the region. Indonesia could plausibly maintain a neutral status without taking part in hostilities, pursuant to its long-standing “free-active” foreign policy. In such a case, the law of neutrality will regulate Indonesia’s relationship with belligerent parties according to corresponding rights and obligations derived from neutral status. However, this body of law is in a state of constant flux, with pragmatic considerations often prevailing over normative consistency. This article explores how Indonesia might implement the law of neutrality to maintain peaceful relations with belligerent parties, with a focus on three specific issues pertaining to its national interest: (1) closure of its archipelagic waters; (2) arms export control; and (3) the protection of its cyber infrastructure. This article concludes by finding that Indonesia is well positioned to make a pragmatic choice based on the geopolitical and socioeconomic conditions prevailing at the time but must pre-empt various legal risks by building its practice and expressing its opinio juris to shape the development of customary international law in this field.

References

Journal Articles and Periodicals

Afriansyah, Arie and Darmawan, Aristyo Rizka. “Sailing between Reefs: Balancing Indonesia’s Maritime Security Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.” Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs 40 (2022): 166-180.

Agusman, Damos Dumoli and Fatihah, Citra Yuda Nur. “Celebrating the 25th Anniversary of UNCLOS Legal Perspective: The Natuna Case.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 17, no. 4 (2020): 539-564. doi:10.17304/ijil.vol17.4.799.

Amonson, Kyle and Egli, Dane. “The Ambitious Dragon: Beijing’s Calculus for Invading Taiwan by 2030.” Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs 6, no. 3 (2023): 38-54.

Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War.” Southeast Asian Affairs (1994): 146-163.

Azmi, Agus Nilmada. “Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia (Kepemimpinan Habibie, Abdurrahman Wahid, Megawati dan Soesilo Bambang Yudhoyono).” Emerald: Journal of Economics and Social Sciences 2, no. 1 (2023): 1-14.

Bills, Amanda. “The Relationship between Third-Party Countermeasures and the Security Council’s Chapter VII Powers: Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 89 (2020): 117-141. doi:10.1163/15718107-bja10003.

Brethouwer, Jan-Tino et al. “Rising Tension in the Himalayas: A Geospatial Analysis of Chinese Border Incursions into India.” PLoS One 17 no. 11 (2022): e0274999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274999.

Budiana, Muhammad. “Analysis of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy during President Jokowi.” Jurnal Mantik 6, no. 3 (2022): 3564-3570.

Buntoro, Kresno. “Legal and Technical Issues on Designating Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage: Indonesia Experience.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 8, no. 2 (2011): 219-248. doi:10.17304/ijil.vol8.2.2.

Çetin, Hakan Cem. “War on Terrorism: What Went Wrong in Afghanistan?” Journal of Human Sciences 10, no. 2 (2013): 532-543.

Clancy, Pearce. “Neutral Arms Transfers and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 72 (2023): 527-543. doi:10.1017/S0020589323000064.

Clapham, Andrew. “Booty, Bounty, Blockade, and Prize: Time to Reevaluate the Law.” International Law Studies 97 (2021): 1200-1268.

Dumbrell, John. “Working with Allies: The United States, the United Kingdom, and the War on Terror.” Politics and Policy 34, no. 2 (2006): 452-472. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00021.x.

Farrant, James. “Modern Maritime Neutrality Law.” International Law Studies 90 (2014): 198-307.

Hatta, Mohammad. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 31, no. 3 (1953): 441-452.

Kraska, James et al. “Newport Manual on the Law of Naval Warfare.” International Law Studies 101 (2023): 1-264.

Lemnitzer, Jan Martin. “Back to the Roots: The Laws of Neutrality and the Future of Due Diligence in Cyberspace.” European Journal of International Law 33, no. 3 (2022): 789-819.

Lestari, Maria Maya. “Study of the Right of Foreign Ship against State Sovereignty (Case Study Indonesia).” Indonesian Journal of International Law 14, no. 4 (2017): 497-513. doi:10.17304/ijil.vol14.4.704

Luo, Shuzian Luo and Panter, Jonathan G. “China’s Maritime Militia and Fishing Fleets: A Primer for Operational Staffs and Tactical Leaders.” Military Review (Jan.-Feb. 2021): 7-21.

Nasu, Hitoshi. “The End of the United Nations? The Demise of Collective Security and Its Implications for International Law.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 24 (2020): 110-136. doi:10.1163/18757413_02401005.

Nasu, Hitoshi. “The Strategic Use of International Law in the Crisis of Taiwan Strait.” Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs 41 (2024): 19-24.

Paterson, Thomas. “Indonesian Cyberspace Expansion: A Double-Edged Sword.” Journal of Cyber Policy 4 (2019): 216-234. doi:10.1080/23738871.2019.1627476.

Pedrason, Rodon. “Indonesian Defense Diplomacy Strategy in Post the ATT Enforcement.” Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 8, no. 2 (2022): 592-600. doi:10.35326/pencerah.v8i2.2255.

Ronzitti, Natalino. “Neutrality, Non-Belligerency, and Permanent Neutrality according to Recent Practice and Doctrinal Views.” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 29 (2024): 55-71. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krae001.

Schmitt, Michael N. “Extraterritorial Lethal Targeting: Deconstructing the Logic of International Law.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52 (2013): 77-112.

Schmitt, Michael N. and Watts, Sean. “Collective Cyber Countermeasures?” Harvard National Security Journal 12 (2021): 373-411.

Setiawati, Siti Mutiah and Roziqin, Ali. “New Trends of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy under President Joko Widodo in the First Period.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 54 (2024): 249-262. doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v54i1.10554.

Smith, Anthony L. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy under Abdurrahman Wahid: Radical or Status Quo State?” Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 3 (2000): 498-526.

Sodik, Dikdik Mohamad. “The Indonesian Legal Framework on Baselines, Archipelagic Passage, and Innocent Passage.” Ocean Development & International Law 43 (2012): 330-341. doi:10.1080/00908320.2012.726830.

Sukma, Rizal. “Indonesia’s Bebas-Aktif Foreign Policy and the ‘Security Agreement’ with Australia.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 51, no. 2 (1997): 231-241. doi:10.1080/10357719708445212.

Sukma, Rizal. “The Evolution of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: An Indonesian View.” Asian Survey 35, no. 3 (1995): 304-315. doi:10.2307/2645547.

Susilawati, Yusuf, Rizal and Rachman, Arief. “Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia yang Bebas Aktif Dasar Mewujudkan Perdamaian Dunia.” Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology 2, no. 3 (2024): 309-318. doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i3.8528.

Umar, Ahmad Rizky Mardhatillah. “The Rise of the Asian Middle Powers: Indonesia’s Conceptions of International Order.” International Affairs 99, no. 4 (2023): 1459-1476. doi:10.1093/ia/iiad167.

Utari, Sevira Marsanti and Wardhani, Baiq. “National Identity and Foreign Policy: Indonesia Million Friends Zero Enemy under Yudhoyono Regime.” Proceedings of Airlangga Conference on International Relations (ACIR 2018) - Politics, Economy, and Security in Changing Indo-Pacific Region (2018): 581-587. doi:10.5220/0010280600002309.

Vatikiotis, Michael R. J. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy in the 1990s.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 14, no. 4 (1993): 352-367.

Vermonte, Philips J. “Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Domestic Sources of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy under SBY’s Presidency (2004-2014).” Indonesian Quarterly 42, no. 3-4 (2014): 201-215.

Wentker, Alexander. “At War? Party Status and the War in Ukraine.” Leiden Journal of International Law 36 (2023): 643-656.

West, Michael J. and Insisa, Aurelio. “Reunifying Taiwan with China through Cross-Strait Lawfare.” The China Quarterly 257 (2024): 186-201. doi:10.1017/S0305741023000735.

Books and Book Chapters

Bartolini, Giulio. “The Historical Roots of the Due Diligence Standard.” in Due Diligence in the International Legal Order, edited by Heike Krieger, Anne Peters, and Leonhard Kruezer, 23-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198869900.003.0002.

Castrén, Erik. The Present Law of War and Neutrality. Helsinki: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, 1954.

Chadwick, Elizabeth. Traditional Neutrality Revisited: Law, Theory and Case Studies. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.

Dawidowicz, Martin. Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Doswald-Beck, Louise. Ed. San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Fleck, Dieter. “The Law of Neutrality.” in The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, edited by Dieter Fleck, 4th ed., 602-633. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

Greenspan, Morris. The Modern Law of Land Warfare. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1959.

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff. “‘Benevolent’ Third States in International Armed Conflicts: The Myth of the Irrelevance of the Law of Neutrality.” in International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, edited by Michael N. Schmitt and Jelena Pejic, 543-568. The Hague: Nijhoff, 2007. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004154285.i-590.104.

Higgins, A. Pearce. The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences Concerning the Laws and Usages of War: Texts of Conventions with Commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909.

International Committee of the Red Cross. Updated Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention of 1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Jayewardene, Hiran W. The Regime of Islands in International Law. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990.

Jessup, Philip C. Neutrality: Its History, Economics and Law. New York: Columbia University Press, 1936.

McDougal, Myres S. and Feliciano, Florentino P. The International Law of War: Transnational Coercion and World Public Order. New Haven, New Haven Press, 1994.

Moore, John Bassett. History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party, vol. I. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1898.

Nandan, Satya N. “An Introduction to the Regime of Passage Through Straits Used for International Navigation and Through Archipelagic Waters.” in Freedom of the Sea, Passage Rights and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, edited by Myron H. Nordquist, Tommy T.B. Koh, and John Norton Moore, 57-64. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009.

Nandan, Satya N. and Rosenne, Shabtai. Eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.

Nasu, Hitoshi. “The Laws of Neutrality in the Interconnected World: Mapping the Future Scenarios.” in The Future Law of Armed Conflict, edited by Matthew C. Waxman and Thomas W. Oakley, 123-139. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197626054.003.0008.

Neff, Stephen C. The Rights and Duties of Neutrals: A General Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.

Ollino, Alice. Due Diligence Obligations in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Proelss, Alexander. Ed. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary. Munich: H.C. Beck, 2017.

Pusat P2K Multilateral and Universitas Budi Luhur. Kajian Strategis Posisi Indonesia Pasca Pemberlakuan Arms Trade Treaty. Jakarta: Universitas Budi Luhur, 2017.

Roach, J. Ashley. Excessive Maritime Claims. 4th ed. Leiden: Brill, 2021.

Rothwell, Donald R. and Stephens, Tim. The International Law of the Sea. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart, 2023.

Schmitt, Michael N. Ed. Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Tan, See Seng and Acharya, Amitav. Eds. Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2008.

Tucker, Robert W. Law of War and Neutrality at Sea. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1955.

Upcher, James. Neutrality in Contemporary International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Wani, Kentaro. Neutrality in International Law: From the Sixteenth Century to 1945. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.

Xue, Hanqin. Transboundary Damage in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Treaties

Arms Trade Treaty, 3013 UNTS 269 (adopted 2 April 2013, entered into force 24 December 2014).

Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 2624 UNTS 223 (adopted 20 November 2007, entered into force 15 December 2008).

Charter of the United Nations, 1 UNTS XVI, 59 Stat. 1031, T.S. No. 993 (opened for signature 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945).

Convention (No. V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 205 Consol. T.S. 299, 36 Stat. 2310, T.S. No. 540 (adopted 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910.

Convention (No. XIII) Concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War, 205 Consol. T.S. 395, 36 Stat. 2415, T.S. No. 545 (adopted 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910).

Declaration on the Neutrality of Laos, 456 UNTS 301 (signed 23 July 1962, entered into force 23 July 1962).

International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training Mercenaries, 2163 UNTS 75 (adopted 4 December 1989, entered into force 20 October 2001).

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1833 UNTS 397 (adopted 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994).

Judicial and Arbitral Decisions

The Alabama Arbitration, reported in John Bassett Moore, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party, vol. I, 495. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1898.

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Preliminary Objections, ICJ Reports 2022.

Dubsky v. The Government of Ireland [2005] IEHC 442.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996.

Legislation and Regulations

Austria. Constitutional Law on Neutrality 1955.

Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 37/2002 on the Rights and Obligations of Foreign Ships and Aircraft Exercising the Right of Archipelagic Sea Lane Passage through Designated Archipelagic Sea Lanes.

Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 71/2019 on the Operation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.

Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 141/2015 concerning the Management of Defense Industry

Indonesia. Law No. 6/1996 on Indonesian National Waters.

Indonesia. Law No. 11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended by Law No. 19/2016 and Law No. 1/2024.

Indonesia. Law No. 16/2012 on Defense Industry.

Indonesia. Minister of Defense Regulation No. 6/2017 on the Determination of the Defense Industry, Production Licensing, Export, and Import of Defense and Security Equipment.

Indonesia. Ministry of Defense Regulation No. 82/2014 on Cyber Defense Guidelines.

Indonesia. Presidential Regulation No. 47/2023 on the National Cybersecurity Strategy and Cyber Crisis Management.

Indonesia. Presidential Regulation No. 82/2022 on the Protection for Vital Information Infrastructure.

Legal Documents

Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, GA Res. 56/83, 12 December 2001.

Defense Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia, Defense White Paper. 3rd ed. 2015.

Federal Council of Switzerland, White Paper on Neutrality: Annex to the Report on Swiss Foreign Policy for the Nineties of 29 November 1993. 1993.

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries, UN Doc. A/56/10, 2001.

Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Defense, Law of War Manual. Rev. ed. July 2023.

Government of Indonesia, Routeing Measures and Mandatory Ship Reporting Systems: Datum Reference Status and Provision of Modern Nautical Charts Covering Indonesian Archipelagic Sea Lanes, IMO Doc. NCSR 6/INF.19, 13 November 2018.

Web Sources

Ahdiat, Adi. “Indonesia Jualan Senjata, Ini Negara Pembelinya [Indonesia Sells Weapons, These are the Trading Countries].” Katadata Media Network, 5 April 2024, https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/04/05/indonesia-jualan-senjata-ini-negara-pembelinya.

Anjani, Noor Halimah. “Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia.” Center for Indonesian Policy Studies, Policy Brief No. 9, March 2021, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249442/1/CIPS-PB09.pdf.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. “Indonesian President to Visit Moscow for Arms Talks.” ABC News, 14 April 2003, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-15/indonesian-president-to-visit-moscow-for-arms-talks/1836576.

Bentley, Scott. “The Maritime Fulcrum of the Indo-Pacific: Indonesia and Malaysia Respond to China’s Creeping Expansion in the South China Sea.” CMSI Red Books, Study No. 17 (2023), https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-red-books/17/.

International Crisis Group. “Thin Ice in the Himalayas: Handling the India-China Border Dispute.” Asia Report No. 334, 14 November 2023, https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/334-thin-ice-himalayas.pdf.

Japan Broadcasting Corporation. “Japan Supplies Ukraine with Gear to Remove Russia-Planted Landmines.” NHK, 4 April 2024, https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20240405_01/.

Laksmana, Evan. “Indonesia as ‘Global Maritime Fulcrum’: A Post-Mortem Analysis.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 8 November 2019, https://amti.csis.org/indonesia-as-global-maritime-fulcrum-a-post-mortem-analysis/.

Miller, Hugo. “Swill to Allow Some Demining Equipment to Be Sent to Ukraine.” Bloomberg, 25 January 2023, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-25/swiss-to-allow-some-demining-equipment-to-be-sent-to-ukraine.

Mulyanto, Randy. “Indonesia’s 2024 Cybersecurity Challenge: Rising Threats and Human Risks.” The Jakarta Post, 12 February 2024, https://www.thejakartapost.com/culture/2024/02/12/indonesias-2024-cybersecurity-challenge-rising-threats-and-human-risks.html.

Nasu, Hitoshi. “The Future Law of Neutrality.” Articles of War, 19 July 2022, https://lieber.westpoint.edu/future-law-of-neutrality/.

Poling, Gregory B. et al. “Pulling Back the Curtain on China’s Maritime Militia.” Center for Strategic & International Studies, 18 November 2021, https://www.csis.org/analysis/pulling-back-curtain-chinas-maritime-militia.

Schmitt, Michael N. “Ukraine Symposium – Are We at War?” Articles of War, 9 May 2022, https://lieber.westpoint.edu/are-we-at-war/.

Supriyanto, Ristian Atriandi. “Indonesia’s Opportunistic Approach to Arms Procurement.” East Asia Forum, 1 July 2021, https://eastasiaforum.org/2021/07/01/indonesias-opportunistic-approach-to-arms-procurement/.

Torrijos, Gavril. “Arms and Influence in Southeast Asia: The Link between Arms Procurement and Strategic Relations.” Center for Strategic & International Studies, 22 September 2022, https://www.csis.org/blogs/new-perspectives-asia/arms-and-influence-southeast-asia-link-between-arms-procurement-and.

Tsagourias, Nicholas. “Ukraine Symposium – Cyber Neutrality, Cyber Recruitment, and Cyber Assistance to Ukraine.” Articles of War, 19 April 2022, https://lieber.westpoint.edu/cyber-neutrality-cyber-recruitment-cyber-assistance-ukraine/.

Download

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 92
    • Abstract Views: 91
see details

Share

COinS