Abstract
Research Aims: This study aims to analyse the influence of top management's commitment on competitive advantage through supply chain digitalisation, responsiveness, and resiliency.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire distributed to manufacturing practitioners with a minimum supervisory position. A total of 203 valid questionnaires were analysed. Data processing was performed using SmartPLS version 4.0 to test measurement and structural models.
Research Findings: The study results indicate that eight hypotheses are accepted and one is rejected. Top management commitment positively impacts supply chain digitalisation, responsiveness, and resilience. Furthermore, supply chain digitalisation and supply chain resilience both positively impact competitive advantage. However, supply chain responsiveness did not affect competitive advantage.
Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This research makes a theoretical contribution to the study of digital technology adoption in supply chain management. Digital technology adoption enhances companies' competitive advantage.
Managerial Implications in the South East Asian Context: In Southeast Asia, there is still low integration, limited digitalisation, and vulnerability to supply chain disruption. The results of this study provide insight into the role of top management in initiating the adoption of digital technology to strengthen resilience and supply chain responsiveness, thereby improving competitive advantage.
Research Limitation and Implications: This study has limitations, particularly on the research sample, which is located in East Java, Indonesia. Hence, the study results may not be valid in other countries.
References
Al-Hawajreh, K. M., & Attiany, M. S. (2014). The effect of supply chain responsiveness on competitive advantage: A field study of manufacturing companies in Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(13), 151-162.
Akram, M. U., Islam, N., Chauhan, C., & Yaqub, M. Z. (2024). Resilience and agility in sustainable supply chains: A relational and dynamic capabilities view. Journal of Business Research, 183, 114855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114855
Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of operations Management, 21(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00056-6
Al Tera, A., Alzubi, A., & Iyiola, K. (2024). Supply chain digitalization and performance: A moderated mediation of supply chain visibility and supply chain survivability. Heliyon, 10(4), e25584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25584
Asamoah, D., Nuertey, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Akyeh, J. (2021). The effect of supply chain responsiveness on customer development. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1190-1213. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2020-0133
Attia, E. A., Alarjani, A., Uddin, M. S., & Kineber, A. F. (2023). Determining the stationary enablers of resilient and sustainable supply chains. Sustainability, 15(4), 3461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043461
Basana, S. R., Siagian, H., Ubud, S., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2022). The role of top management commitment in enhancing competitive advantage: The mediating role of green innovation, supplier, and customer integration. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.12.003
Deepu, T. S., & Ravi, V. (2021). Supply chain digitalization: An integrated MCDM approach for inter-organizational information systems selection in an electronic supply chain. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100038
European Commission. (2024). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Retrieved from https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
Feng, T., Si, Z., Jiang, W., & Tan, J. (2024). Supply chain transformational leadership and resilience: The mediating role of ambidextrous business model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03099-x
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gebhardt, M., Spieske, A., Kopyto, M., & Birkel, H. (2022). Increasing global supply chains' resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study. Journal of Business Research, 150, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.008
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Huo, B., Li, D., & Gu, M. (2024). The impact of supply chain resilience on customer satisfaction and financial performance: A combination of contingency and configuration approaches. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 9(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2023.10.002
Ivanov, D. (2024). Transformation of supply chain resilience research through the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Production Research, 62(23), 8217-8238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2334420
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Digital supply chain management and Industry 4.0: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1924–1937. https://doi.org/10.53102/2023.37.02.953
Jiang, F., Isa, F. M., Ng, S. P., & Bhatti, M. (2023). The impact of supply chain integration to supply chain responsiveness in Chinese electronics manufacturing companies. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231219070. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231219070
Kazancoglu, I., Ozbiltekin-Pala, M., Mangla, S. K., Kazancoglu, Y., & Jabeen, F. (2022). Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132431
Khan, S., Singh, R., Haleem, A., Dsilva, J., & Ali, S. S. (2022). Exploration of critical success factors of Logistics 4.0: A DEMATEL approach. Logistics, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6010013
Khan, S., Singh, R., Sá, J. C., Santos, G., & Ferreira, L. P. (2022). Modelling of determinants of Logistics 4.0 adoption: Insights from developing countries. Machinery, 10(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10121242
Kitsis, A. M., & Chen, I. J. (2021). Do stakeholder pressures influence green supply chain practices? Exploring the mediating role of top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128258
Korucuk, S., Tirkolaee, E. B., Aytekin, A., Karabasevic, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023). Agile supply chain management based on critical success factors and most ideal risk reduction strategy in the era of industry 4.0: application to plastic industry. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 1698-1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00360-5
Laari, S., Rintala, O., Töyli, J., Solakivi, T., & Ojala, L. (2024). Evaluating firm resilience through responsiveness and logistics outsourcing in the COVID-19 era. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(7), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2024-0133
Latuconsina, Z., Christianty, R., Tamher, E., Tutupoho, S., & Ralahallo, F. (2023). Analysis of the supply chain response power, practices and firm capabilities on competitive advantage and performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 585-592. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.2.006
Miles, M. P., Covin, J. G., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance. Journal of marketing Theory and Practice, 8(2), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2000.11501869
Ning, L., & Yao, D. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on supply chain capabilities and supply chain competitive performance. Sustainability, 15(13), 10107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310107
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
Prabhu, H. M., & Srivastava, A. K. (2023). CEO transformational leadership, supply chain agility and firm performance: A TISM modeling among SMEs. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00323-y
Putri, R. L. S., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Siagian, H. (2024). The effect of integrated information technology on competitive advantage through supply chain integration and supply chain flexibility. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(3), 1841-1854. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.2.018
Rezaei, G., Hosseini, S. M. H., & Sana, S. S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between data analytics capability and competitive advantage: The mediating roles of supply chain resilience and organizational flexibility. Sustainability, 14(16), 10444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610444
Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Adams, F. G., & Wieland, A. (2022). A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(1), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12290
Setiawan, H., Tarigan, Z., & Siagian, H. (2023). Digitalization and green supply chain integration to build supply chain resilience toward better firm competitive advantage. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.1.012
Shafique, M. N., Yeo, S. F., & Tan, C. L. (2024). Roles of top management support and compatibility in big data predictive analytics for supply chain collaboration and supply chain performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 199, 123074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123074.
Siagian, H., Basana, S. R., Tarigan, Z. J. H., Novitasari, M., & Jie, F. (2024). Role of supply chain management in improving competitive advantage of Indonesian small and medium enterprises. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.54
Srivastava, D. K., Kumar, V., Ekren, B. Y., Upadhyay, A., Tyagi, M., & Kumari, A. (2022). Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121439
Stentoft, J., & Mikkelsen, O. S. (2024). Towards supply chain resilience: A structured process approach. Operations Management Research, 17, 1421–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00513-0
Thatte, A. A., Rao, S. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2013). Impact of SCM practices of a firm on supply chain responsiveness and competitive advantage of a firm. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 499-530. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7653.
Wang, S., & Li, J. (2024). How carbon emission trading mechanism and supply chain digitization affect manufacturing enterprises’ competitiveness? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452, 142164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142164
World Bank. (2023). Logistics Performance Index 2023. Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org
Zhao, N., Hong, J., & Lau, K. H. (2023). Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108817
Recommended Citation
Siagian, Hotlan; Basana, Sautma Ronni; Suprapto, Widjojo; and Tarigan, Zeplin Jiwa Husada Anakku
(2026)
"The Influence of Top Management Commitment on Competitive Advantage through Supply Chain Resilience, Supply Chain Digitalisation, and Supply Chain Responsiveness,"
The South East Asian Journal of Management: Vol. 20:
No.
1, Article 3.
DOI: 10.7454/seam.v20i1.2031
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/seam/vol20/iss1/3
Included in
Management Information Systems Commons, Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons
