•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The consumption of dog meat has been a common practice in the past few decades and a symbol for certain groups all around the world. Dogs Are Not Food (DANF) is a new social movement aimed to ban dog meat consumption, initiated by several animal rights organizations in Indonesia. The campaign seems to be self-contradictory: why ban the consumption of dog meat while still allowing the consumption of meat from other animals? Drawing on framing analysis, this article uses participant observation and in-depth interview with some self-identified animal activists and/or supporters of DANF. In contrast to previous studies, which are too critical of DANF, this article gives a sociological explanation on the functions of dogs in society and analysis of DANF’s framing. I argue that the framing used by the movement attempts to humanize non-human animals. Banning consumption of dog meat, therefore, is the goal of the DANF campaign.

Bahasa Abstract

Konsumsi daging anjing merupakan sebuah kebiasaan umum dalam beberapa dekade terakhir dan telah menjadi simbol bagi beberapa kelompok masyarakat di seluruh dunia. Dogs Are Not Food (DANF) adalah sebuah gerakan sosial yang ditujukan untuk menghapuskan konsumsi daging anjing. Gerakan ini diinisiasi oleh beberapa organisasi hak asasi satwa di Indonesia. Kampanye tersebut menjadi kontradiksi tersendiri: mengapa organisasi-organisasi tersebut melarang konsumsi daging anjing namun tetap mengonsumsi daging satwa lain? Bertolak dari konsep analisis framing, tulisan ini menggunakan observasi partisipatoris dan wawancara mendalam dengan informan-informan yang mengidentifikasi dirinya sebagai aktivis satwa dan/atau pendukung gerakan DANF. Berbeda dengan studi-studi sebelumnya yang cenderung mengkritik gerakan DANF, tulisan ini memberikan sebuah penjelasan sosiologis mengenai fungsi anjing dalam masyarakat dan menganalisis framing gerakan DANF. Tulisan ini berargumen bahwa framing yang digunakan oleh gerakan DANF bertujuan untuk “memanusiakan” satwa. Oleh karena itu, pelarangan konsumsi daging anjing menjadi tujuan gerakan DANF.

References

Ascione, Frank R., and Kenneth Shapiro. 2009. “People and Animals, Kindness and Cruelty: Research Directions and Policy Implications”. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 569- 587. Retrieved April 28, 2015 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01614.x/epdf). Cain, A. O. 1983. “A Study of Pets in the Family System”. In A. H. Katcher and A. M. Beck (Eds.), New Perspectives on Our Lives on Companion Animals (pp. 72 – 81). Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press. Campbell, D. T. 1950. “The Indirect Assesment of Social Attitudes”. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 15-38. Castells, Manuel. 1997. The power of identity. Oxford:Blackwell. Cherry, Elizabeth. 2010. “Shifting Symbolic Boundaries: Cultural Strategies of the Animal Rights Movement”. Sociological Forum, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 450-475. Retrieved March 20, 2015 (http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01191.x/pdf). Cresswell, John W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Method Approach. USA: Sage Publication. Daily Mail. 2012. “Saved From The Dinner Table: Activists Rescue More Than 500 Caged Dogn Destined For Restaurants in China”. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ article-2133151/Saved-dinner-table-Activists-rescue-500-caged-dogs- destined-restaurants-China.html). Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The University of Chicago Press. ------. 1978. Writing and Difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ------. 1981. Dissemination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Duckler, Geordie. 2007. “Animal Wrongs: On Holding Animals To (And Excusing Them From) Legal Responsibility For Their Intentional Acts”. Journal of Animal Law & Ethics, 2:92, 91- 121. Retrieved July 10, 2015 (http://law.lclark.edu/live/files/9494- duckler--animal-wrongs). ------. 2008. “Two Major Flaws of The Animal Rights Movement”. Animal Law, 14:2, 179-200. Retrieved July 10, 2015 (http://law. lclark.edu/live/files/9495-duckler--two-major-flaws-of-the-animal- rights). Eberhard, W. 1977. A History of China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Einwohner, Rachel L. 1999. “Gender, Class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and Effectiveness in The Animal Rights Campaigns”. Gender & Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, Special Issues: Gender and Social Movements, Part 2 (Feb 1999), pp. 56-76. Retrieved June 2, 2015 (http://gas.sagepub.com/content/13/1/56. full.pdf+html). Francione, Gary L. 1996. Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of The Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of The Oppressed. Garner, Robert. 2003. “Political Ideologies and The Moral Status of Animals”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8:2, 233-246. Retrieved June 13, 2015 (http://www.trincoll.edu/Academics/centers/TIIS/ Documents/Robert%20Garner,%20Political%20ideologies.pdf). ------. 2008. “The Politics of Animal Rights”. British Politics (2008) 3, 110-119. Retrieved June 13, 2015 (http://www.tier-im-fokus.ch/ wp-content/uploads/2009/09/garner08a.pdf). Giddens, A. 2009. Introduction to sociology. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. Hart, Lynette A. 1995. “Dogs as Humans Companions: A Review of the Relationship” (pp. 161 - 178) in The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour, and Interactions with People. UK: Cambridge University Press. Herz, R. S. 2011. PROP Taste Sensitivity is Related to Visceral but Not Moral Disgust, 4:72-79. Retrieved May 9, 2015 (http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.303&rep=r ep1&type=pdf). Herzog, H. A., and Golden, L. L. 2009. “Moral Emotions and Social Activism: The Case of Animal Rights”. Jurnal of Social Issues, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2009, pp. 485-498. Retrieved March 23, 2015 (http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.2009.65.issue-3/issuetoc). Herzog, H., and Knight S. 2009. “All Creatures Great And Small: New Perspectives On Psychology And Human-Animal Interactions”. Jurnal of Social Issues, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2009. Retrieved March 23, 2015 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01608.x/epdf). Huffington Post, 2012. “Homeless Pets: 3 Nonprofits That Help People Living on The Streets Feed Their Animals”. Retrieved November 17, 2015) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/04/ homeless-pets_n_1402900.html). Kim, R. E. 2007. “Dog meat in Korea: A socio-legal challenge”. Animal Law 14: 221-236. Retrieved May 26, 2015 (https://www. animallaw.info/sites/default/files/lralvol14_2_201.pdf). Lobell, J. A., and Powell, E. 2010. “More than man’s best friend”. Archaeology, September/October, Vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 26-35. Retrieved August 2, 2015 (http://archive.archaeology.org/1009/ dogs/). Macionis, John J. 1997. Sociology: Sixth Edition. New Jersey, Prentice- Hall, Upper Saddle River. NBC News. 2006. “Dog Makes Cell Phone Call to Save Owner’s Life”. Retrieved November 17, 2014 (http://www.nbcnews.com/ id/13439261/#.VksvmnYrLIU). Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2004. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Olson, Mancur. 2002. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Groups and The Theory of Groups. USA: Harvard University Press.Opp, Karl D. 2009. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis. USA: Routledge. “Pets in Society: Overall Benefits.” Fediaf.org Retrieved November 17, 2015 (http://www.fediaf.org/pets-in-society/overall-benefits/). Ritzer, George and Goodman, Douglas J. 2010. Sociological Theory. USA: McGraw-Hill . Serpell, James. 1996. The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour, and Interactions with People. US: Cambridge University Press. Simoons, F. J. 1961. Eat Not This Flesh: Food Avoidances from Prehistory to the Present. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Snyder, L. M., and Klippel, W. E. 2003. “From Lerna to Kastro: Further Thoughts on Dogs as Food in Ancient Greece: Perceptions, Prejudices and Reinvestigations”. British School at Athens Studies 9: 221-231. Retrieved May 16, 2015 (https://www.jstor.org/ stable/40960350?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents). “Stop dan Ilegalkan Perdagangan Daging Anjing untuk Konsumsi di Indonesia.” 2014. Change.org Retrieved September 15, 2015 (https://www.change.org/p/basuki-btp-suswono-sri-sultan-hb-x- stop-dan-ilegalkan-perdagangan-daging-anjing-untuk-konsumsi- di-indonesia). The Jakarta Post, 2015. “Activists See Regulation As Step To Prohibit Dog As Food”. Retrieved October 10, 2015 (http://www. thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/01/activists-see-regulation-step- prohibit-dog-food.html). Time. 2015. “For National Dog Day, Meet a Hero Dog From 1928”. Retrieved November 17, 2015 (http://time.com/3995030/national- dog-day-heroes-history/). Tito, R. Y., Belknap III, S. L., Sobolik, K. D., Ingraham, R. C., Cleveland, L. M., and Lewis Jr, C. M. 2011. “Brief Communication: DNA From Early Holocene American Dog”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 145: 653-657. Retrieved August 24, 2015 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1002/ajpa.21526/pdf). Turner, Jonathan H., Stets, Jan E. 2006. Sociological Theories of Human Emotions. USA: University of California Press. Udell, M. A. ., and Wynne, C. D. 2008. “A Review of Domestic Dogs’ (Canis Familiaris) Human-Like Behaviors: Or Why Behavior Analysts Should Stop Worrying and Love Their Dogs”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89(2), 247–261. Retrieved August 30, 2015 (https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/a- review-of-domestic-dogs-canis-familiarisa-human-like-behaviors-). “Video Petisi Stop Perdagangan Daging Anjing.” 2014. Rian Guntoro Retrieved Januari 10, 2015 (https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=zFP0RMpAAsA). Vila, C., Maldonado, J. E., and Wayne, R. K. 1999. “Phylogenetic Relationships, Evolution, and Genetic Diversity of The Domestic Dog”. Journal of Heredity 90: 71-77. Retrieved August 13, 2015 (http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/1/71.full.pdf+html). Weber, Max. 1936. Social Action. US: Sage Publication. “Konsumsi Daging Anjing di Flores dan Jakarta” 2015. Garda Satwa Indonesia Retrieved September 30, 2015 (http://www. gardasatwaindonesia.org/2015/10/flores-jakarta-dan-daging-anjing/).

Share

COinS