Abstract
After 1998 Reformation, Indonesia has been experiencing democratization and decentralization. Among others, general election for local government (pemilukada) since 2005 is an implementation of democratization and decentralization. Although democratization in Indonesia was praised by some researchers, many others also figured out some corruptive actions in the democratic process. Warren’s conception about democratic corruption helped us to understand the paradox of post-Reformation democratization and decentralization. According to Warren, corruption in a democracy is a duplicitous exclusion that gives an advantage to few parties in the expense of the others who are excluded from the process of decision-making and collective action. However, the author suggests that there is incompleteness in Warren’s conceptualization when he identified the location of corruption that is differentiated in a democratic regime. Warren identified only four locations of corruption, that is the state, public sphere, civil society, and market. Took local elections in Lampung as a case study, this article identified other location, that is the political party. This article argues, corruption of democracy in the political party is indicated primarily by political party’s centralism in recruiting and selecting local leader candidates.
References
Freedom House. 2009. Freedom in the World 2009. Wasington DC: Freedom House. Hadiz, Vedi R. 2005. Dinamika Kekuasaan Ekonomi Politik Indonesia pasca-Soeharto. Jakarta: LP3ES. Harjanto, Nico. 2011. “Politik Kekerabatan dan Institusionalisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia.” Analisis CSIS: Politik dan Kekerabatan di Indonesia 40(2):138-159. Mietzner, Marcus. 2007. “Party Financing in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Between State Subsidies and Political Corruption.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 29(2):238-263. Sidel, John T. 2005. “Bossism and Democracy in the Philipines, Thailand and Indonesia: Towards an Alternatif Framework for the Study ‘Local Strongmen’.” hlm. 51-74 dalam Politicing Democracy: Local Politics and Democratisation in Developing Countries, disunting oleh John Harris, Kristian Stokke, dan Olle Tornquist. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Supriatma, A. M. T. 2009. “Menguatnya Kartel Politik Para Bos.” Prisma 28(2):3-14. Ufen, Andreas. 2006. “Political Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between Politik Aliran and ‘Philippinisation’.” GIGA Working Papers 37. Warren, Mark E. 2004. “What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?” American Journal of Political Science 48(2):328-343. ------. 2006. “Political Corruption as Duplicitous Exclusion.” Political Science and Politics 37(4):803-807. Webber, Douglas. 2006. “Consolidated Patrimonial Democracy? Democratization in Post Suharto Indonesia.” Democratization 13(3):396-429.
Recommended Citation
Irham, Muhammad Aqil
(2016)
"Korupsi Demokratis dalam Partai Politik:Studi Kasus Penyelenggaraan Pemilukada Lampung,"
Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi: Vol. 21:
No.
1, Article 3.
DOI: 10.7454/MJS.v21i1.1037
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/mjs/vol21/iss1/3
Included in
Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Development Studies Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Human Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Organizational Communication Commons, Sociology Commons