Abstract

Transportasi merupakan hal yang sangat dibutuhkan dalam menunjang pembangunan nasional. Belum baiknya sistem transportasi massal di Indonesia, membuat masyarakat lebih memilih menggunakan kendaraan pribadi, seperti sepeda motor yang praktis dan ekonomis untuk digunakan. Namun, dalam menggunakan sepeda motor, aspek ergonomi dan kenyamanan bagi pengendara perlu untuk diperhatikan. Desain dan ukuran tempat duduk sepeda motor yang tidak sesuai dengan antropometri duduk statis pengendara dapat menimbulkan kelelahan pada pengendara dan mengakibatkan terjadinya kecelakaan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui risiko ergonomi dari ketidaksesuaian antara desain dan ukuran tempat duduk sepeda motor dengan antropometri duduk statis. Untuk menganalisis risiko ergonomi, dilakukan penelitian dengan desain deskriptif analitik pada mahasiswa di sekitar lingkungan kampus Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia pada bulan Oktober sampai dengan Desember 2009. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 100 orang responden, dibagi menjadi 50 orang laki-laki dan 50 orang perempuan. Sampel responden dipilih dengan metode cluster random sampling, sedangkan tipe sepeda motor dipilih berdasarkan yang paling banyak digunakan dengan metode simple stratified random sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian antara ukuran tempat duduk sepeda motor dengan antropometri duduk statis pada mahasiswa. Adanya ketidaksesuaian tersebut dapat mengakibatkan risiko ergonomi pada pengendara dan terjadinya kecelakaan lalu lintas. Transportation is something needed most to support national development. Bad mass transportation system in Indonesia, makes people prefer to use private vehicles, such as motorcycle which is practical and economical to use. However, riders need to consider ergonomic and comfortability aspects in using motorcycle. The design and size of motorcycle seat in compatible with the rider’s static seat anthropometry may cause fatigue among riders and lead to accidents. The study aimed to find out ergonomic risks of incompatibility between the design and size of the motorcycle seat with static sitting anthropometry. To analyze the ergonomic risks, this study was conducted using analitical descriptive design among college students at Public Health Faculty Universitas Indonesia on October to December 2009. The total sample was 100 respondents, divided into 50 men and 50 women. The sample of respondents was selected using random cluster sampling method, meanwhile the type of motorcycle was selected based on the most widely used with simple stratified random sampling method. The results showed any incompatibility between the size of motorcycle seat with static sitting anthropometry among collage students. Such incompatibility may cause ergonomic risks among rider and lead to traffic accidents.

References

1. Karmegam K, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Ismail N. Conceptual design and prototype of an ergonomic back-leaning posture support for motorbike riders. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 2008 August; 67 (8): 599-604.

2. Chou JR, Hsiao SW. An anthropometric measurement for developing an electric scooter. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2005 November; 35 (11): 1047-63.

3. Colella WG. Market prospects, design features, and performance of a fuel cell-powered scooter. Journal of Power Sources. 2000 March; 86 (1- 2): 255-60.

4. Korps Lalulintas Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Korlantas Polri). Data pertambahan sepeda motor [Internet]. Jakarta [diakses tanggal 26 September 2014]. Diunduh dalam: http://www.lantas.polri.go.id.

5. Asosiasi Industri Sepeda Motor Indonesia (AISI). Data penjualan sepeda motor tahun 2009 [Internet]. Jakarta [diakses tanggal 26 September 2011]. Diunduh dalam: http://www.aisi.or.id/statistic/.

6. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action [internet]. The Organization; 2013 [cited 2014 Sept 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/

7. Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. Upaya melindungi pengendara sepeda motor dari ancaman maut di jalan raya 2012 [Internet]. Jakarta: 2012 [diakses tanggal 1 September 2014]. Diunduh dalam: http://hubdat.dephub.go.id/berita/988-72-persen-kecelakaanjalan-raya-melibatkan-sepeda-motor.

8. Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. Perhubungan darat dalam angka 2009. Jakarta [diakses tanggal 1 September 2014]. Diunduh dalam: http://hubdat.dephub.go.id/data-a-informasi/pdda/ tahun-2010.

9. Unit Pengelola Teknis Pengamanan Lingkungan Kampus Universitas Indonesia. Data kecelakaan transportasi di kawasan UI tahun 2006 – 2008. Depok: Unit Pengelola Teknis Pengamanan Lingkungan Kampus Universitas Indonesia; 2009.

10. Langham M, Hole G, Edwards J, O’Neil C. An analysis of ‘looked but failed to see’ accidents involving parked police cars. Journal of Ergonomics [serial on the Internet]. 2010 November [cited 2014 Sept 4]; 45 (3): 167-185. Availabe from: http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1080/00140130110115363?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id =ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&#.VW6Nl 8-qqko.

11. Chandra T, Yudiantyo W, Gozali J. Perancangan sepeda motor jenis bebek yang ergonomis dengan menggunakan data antropometri orang indonesia. Faculty of Engineering Maranatha University. 2013 October [cited 2014 August 31]. Available from: http://repository.maranatha. edu/4303/

12. Pheasant S. Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. 3rd ed. United States: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.

13. Patil MM, Bajpai L, Verma PL. Design and development of motorcycle seat from ergonomics point of view with vibration and discomfort analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. December 2014; 5 (12): 09-15.

14. Notoatmodjo S. Metode penelitian kesehatan. Bandung: Rineka Cipta; 2010.

15. International Standard Organization (ISO). ISO 7250-1:2008: Basic human body measurement for technological design. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standard Organization; 2008.

16. Bergs J, Kanaska D. Motor vehicle seats and their defect classification. 11th International Scientific Conference on Engineering for Rural Development [online]. 2012 May 24-25, Jelgava, Latvia. Jelgava: Latvia University of Agliculture; 2012 [cited 2014 Sept 4]. Available from: http://tf.llu.lv/conference/proceedings2012/Papers/055_Bergs_J.pdf

17. Fatollahzadeh K. A mathematical model approach with respect to anthropometry, body landmark locations and discomfort [doctoral thesis]. Stockholm (Sweden): Royal Institute of Technology Division of Industrial Ergonomics Stockholm; 2006.

18. Openshaw S, Taylor E. Ergonomics and design a reference guide. United States: All steel Inc: 2006

19. Salai M, Brosch T, Blankstein A, Oran A, Chechik A. Effect of changing the saddle angle on the incidence of low back pain in recreational bicyclists. British Journal of Sports Medicine [serial on the Internet]. 2012 August [cited 2014 Sept 4]; 33 (6): 398-400. Available from: http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/33/6/398

20. Beach T, Parkinson R, Stothart P, Callaghan J. Effects of prolonged sitting on the passive flexion stiffness of the in vivo lumbar spine. The Spine Journal. 2005 March-April; 5 (2): 145-54.

21. Muyor JM, Lopez-Minarro PA, Alacid F. Spinal posture of thoracic and lumbar spine and pelvic tilt in highly trained cyclist. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2011 June; 10 (2): 355-61.

22. Polga DJ, Beaubien BP, Kallemeier, Schellhas KP, Lew WD, Butterman GR, et al. Measurement of in vivo intradiscal pressure in healthy thoracic intervertebral discs. Spine Journal. 2004 June; 29 (12): 1320-4.

23. GO A, Lawrence I. Ergonomic design of Nigerian motorcycle and its vibrational analysis. Standard Scientific Research and Essays. June 2014; 2 (6): 251-9.

Download

Share

COinS