•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Kelelahan merupakan salah satu faktor penyebab kecelakaan transportasi, ditandai dengan menurunnya kinerja fisik dan mental yang mengakibatkan kurangnya kewaspadaan karena rasa kantuk. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor risiko dan faktor pendukung kelelahan pada operator alat berat. Penelitian dilakukan pada operator alat berat di 3 tambang batubara di Kalimantan (2 area di Kalimantan Timur dan 1 area di Kalimantan Selatan), melibatkan 353 operator alat berat yang bekerja dengan 3 sif. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa keluhan kelelahan semakin tinggi dengan meningkatnya usia, lama kerja, dan kerja pada sif 3 (malam hari). Kelelahan paling banyak dirasakan oleh operator dump truck (bagian hauling) yang dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor pekerjaan (postur saat bekerja, faktor variasi pekerjaan, beban kerja dan vigilance) dan faktor-faktor bukan pekerjaan (kondisi medan atau area tambang yang berisiko, penerangan yang kurang pada malam hari, dan rute yang selalu berubah). Faktor lainnya berkaitan dengan masalah sosial-psikologis, baik yang berhubungan dengan pekerjaan maupun lingkungan kerja, seperti waktu istirahat, standar gaji yang belum memadai, pengaturan jadwal cuti yang sering tidak jelas, dan masalah karier. Disimpulkan, secara umum kelelahan meningkat dengan bertambahnya usia dan lama kerja, dengan kelelahan yang lebih besar pada pekerja sif 3. Umumnya, penurunan waktu reaksi pekerja sif malam lebih besar daripada waktu reaksi pekerja sif siang. Fatigue is one of the causes of transportation accidents, characterized by reduced physical and mental performance resulting in reduced alertness due to drowsiness. The present study was to determine the risk factors and contributing factors of fatigue suffered by heavy equipment operators. The study was conducted at three coal mining sites in Kalimantan (2 areas in East Kalimantan and 1 area in South Kalimantan) involving 353 heavy equipment operators who work in shifts. It was found that fatigue complaint is higher by older age, longer work, and work at shift 3 (night time). The fatigue is mostly complained by dump truck (hauling part) operators which was influenced by work-related factors (work posture, job variety, workload, vigilance) and non-work related factors (terrain or mine risk area, lack of lighting at night, and route track which is always changed). Another factors related with socio-psychological factors, either related with job or working environment, such as adequacy of rest time, remuneration system, leave system, and insecure career. It is concluded that in general the fatigues were increased as the worker ages were older and longer duration of work, with higher fatigues were suffered at shift 3. Generally, reduced reaction time among shift 3 workers is higher than that those of daytime shift.

References

1. Australian Safety and Compensation Council. Work-related fatigue: summary of recent indicative research 2006. Canberra: Australian Government; 2006. 2. Baker A, Ferguson S. Work design, fatigue and sleep: a resource document for the minerals industry. Australia: Minerals Council of Australia; 2004. 3. Beaulieu JK. The issues of fatigue and working time in the road transport sector. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2005. 4. Klauer SG. The effects of fatigue on driver performance for single and team long-haul truck drivers. Proceeddings of the second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; 2003. p. 143-7. 5. Savage M, Pipkins D. The effect of rest periods on hand fatigue and productivity. Journal of Industrial Technology. 2006; 22(3): 1-6. 6. De Vries J, Michielsen HJ, Van Heck GL. Assessment of fatigue among working people: a comparison of six questionnaires. USA: Occupational Environment Medicine; 2003. 7. United States, Department of Health and Human Services. Overtime findings on illnesses, injuries, and health behaviours. Washington: Center for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2004. 8. Ehrlich SS, Friedman L, Richter ED, Working conditions and fatigue in professional truck drivers at Israeli ports. Injury Prevention Journal. 2005; 11: 110-4. 9. Russeng SR. Faktor risiko terjadinya kecelakaan bus trayek Toraja-Makassar tahun 2003-2007. Jurnal Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia. 2008: 4(2): 93-5. 10. Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2004; 56: 157-70. 11. Sherry P. Final report on assessment of fatigue in train and engine employees of the union pacific railroad in the San Antonio area [Project Report]. Denver: University of Denver: 2005. 12. Hilderbrandt VH, Bongers PM, Van Dijk FJH, Kemper HCG, Dul J. Dutch musculoskeletal questionnaire: description and basic qualities. Ergonomics [serial on internet]. 2001; 44 (12): 1038-55 [cited 2011 Dec 10]. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11780727. 13. Kinetic Centre for Human Sciences & Simon Folkard Associates Limited. The development of a fatigue/risk index for shiftworkers. England: Health and Safety Execituve; 2006. 14. Roads and Traffic Authority. Driver fatigue: problem definition and countermeasure summary. Sydney: Road and Traffic Authority; 2001. 15. Savage M, Pipkins D. The effect of rest periods on hand fatigue and productivity. Journal of Industrial Technology. 2006; 22(3): 1-6. 16. Sherman K. An evaluation of fatigue and performance changes during intermittent overhead work [thesis]. Blakssburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute; 2003. 17. Human Performance Research Group. NASA Task Load Index v.1.0 computerized version. California: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. 18. Winwood PC, Winefield AH, Lushington K. Work-related fatigue and recovery: the contribution of age, domestic responsibilities and shift work. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 56(4): 438-49. 19. Magnusson ML, Pope MH. A review of the biomechanics and epidemiology of working postures. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1998; 215(4): 965-6. 20. Lamond N, Drew D, Roach GD. Fatigue assessment in the field: validation of a hand-held electronic psychomotor vigilance task. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine Journal. 2005; 76(5): 486-9. 21. Thiffault P, Bergeron J. Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: a simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention Journal. 2003; 35: 381-91.96

Download

Share

COinS