Abstract
Berat badan lahir 2.500 gram yang hingga kini merupakan standar ukuran risiko morbiditas dan mortalitas bayi merupakan faktor risiko penting yang berdampak hingga usia dewasa. Saat ini, bayi dengan berat badan lahir di bawah 3.000 gram dihubungkan dengan risiko penyakit degeneratif pada usia dewasa. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui hubungan berat badan lahir dengan status gizi ibu meliputi berat badan prahamil, pertambahan berat badan selama kehamilan, dan kadar hemoglobin ibu pada trimester ketiga kehamilan. Penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain cross sectional ini menggunakan sumber data sekunder rekam medis Rumah Sakit Ibu dan Anak Budi Kemuliaan Jakarta. Analisis dilakukan secara bivariat dan multivariat menggunakan metode uji chi square dan korelasi regresi. Hasil studi menunjukkan hubungan yang bermakna antara berat badan prahamil dan pertambahan berat badan ibu selama kehamilan dengan berat badan lahir. Setelah dikontrol berbagai variabel lain, analisis regresi logistik ganda menemukan berat badan ibu prahamil, pertambahan berat badan selama kehamilan, usia ibu, dan urutan kelahiran merupakan faktor yang memengaruhi berat badan lahir. Berat badan prahamil ibu merupakan faktor yang paling berpengaruh terhadap berat badan lahir (odds ratio, OR = 6,64). Oleh sebab itu, ibu dengan status gizi prahamil kurang yang sedang merencanakan kehamilan perlu lebih diperhatikan.
The weight of 2.500 gram is still being used as the cut off point to predict the risk of baby’s morbidity and mortality. Recently birth weight of less than 3.000 gram is being rigorously assess as a risk factor for noncommunicable disease in adulthood. Therefore it is important to assess factors that are affecting the fetal growth and development. The objectives of this study is to determine the relationship between infant’s birth weight and mother’s nutritional status, i.e. pre-pregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, and maternal haemoglobin level in the 3rd trimester as well as several other factors. The study design is cross sectional using secondary data from medical record of Budi Kemuliaan Hospital Jakarta. The result of chi square and correlation regression test shows there is significant relationship between prepregnancy weight and weight gain during pregnancy and birth weight. The multiple logistic regression test reveals that pre-pregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, maternal age, and birth order are factors that are effecting birth weight significantly, with prepregnancy weight as the dominant factor (odds ratio, OR = 6,643). Therefore, it is imperative to give more attention to undernourished women who are planning their pregnancy.
References
1. Hales CN, Barker DJP. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. British Medical Bulletin. 2001; 60: 5-20.
2. World Health Organization. Promoting optimal fetal development report of a technical consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
3. Rosso P. Nutrition and metabolism in pregnancy, mother, and fetus. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
4. Achadi EL, Hansell MJ, Sloan NL, Anderson MA. Women’s nutritional status, iron consumption, and weight gain during pregnancy in relation to neonatal weight and length in West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Gynecology and Obsterics. 1995; 48 Suppl: 103-19.
5. Hasan NE, Shalaan AH, El-Masry SA. Relationship between maternal characteristics and neonatal birth size in Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2011; 17 (4).
6. Institute of Medicine. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington DC: National Academy of Science; 2009.
7. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset kesehatan dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2010.
8. Kramer MS. Determinant of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1987; 65 (5): 663-737.
9. Yongki. Analisis pertambahan berat badan ibu hamil berdasarkan status sosial ekonomi dan status gizi serta hubungannya berat bayi baru lahir [disertasi]. Bogor: Fakultas Gizi Masyarakat Institut Pertaian Bogor; 2007.
10. United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination SubCommittee on Nutrition. Low birth weight. Report of meeting Nutrition Policy Paper. Dhaka: World Health Orgaization; 2000. Report No. 18.
11. Leeson CP, Kattenhorn M, Morley R, Lucas A, Deanfield JE. Impact of low birth weight and cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial function in early adult life. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1264-8. Available from: http://www.circ.ahajournals.org.
12. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Spencer HG, Bateson P. Environmental influences during development and their later consequences for health and disease: implications for the interpretation of empirical studies. Proceedings Biological Sciences/The Royal Society. 2005; 272: 671-7.
13. Achadi EL. Pengukuran status gizi ibu hamil dan ibu menyusui dengan metode antropometri. Nutrire Diaita. 2008; 1 (1): 49-76.
14. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 105 (5 Pt 1): 983-90.
15. Klainman. Maternal and child nutrition and pregnancy outcomes. In: Krasovec K, Anderson MA. Washington DC: PAHO; 1991.
16. United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization. Low birthweight: country, regional, and global estimates. United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization: New York and Geneva; 2004.
17. Geronimus AT, Korenman S. Maternal youth or family background? On the health disadvantages of infants with teenage mothers. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993; 137 (2): 213-25.
18. Pivarnik JM. Potential effects of maternal physical activity on birth weight: brief review. 1998; 30 (3): 400-6.
19. Asiah S, Suwoyo, Mahaendriningtyastuti. Karakteristik bayi berat lahir rendah (BBLR) sampai tribulan II tahun 2009 di Kota Kediri. J Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes. 2010; 1 (3): 210-22. Diunduh dari: http://www.jurnal.pdii. lipi. go.id/admin/jurnal/1310210222.pdf.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1998; 47 (RR-3): 1-36.
21. Allen LH. Anemia and iron deficiency: effects on pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000; 71 (5 Suppl): 1280S-4S.
22. Scholl T, Hediger ML. Anemia and iron-deficiency anemia: compilation of data on pregnancy outcome. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994; 59: 492-501.
23. Pebley AR, DaVanzo J. Maternal depletion and child survival in Guatemala and Malaysia. Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, April 21-23 1988; New Orleans, LA. In: Winkvist A. A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. American Journal of Public Health. 1992; 82691-694.
24. Agudelo AC, Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes a meta-analysis. The Journal of The American Medical Association. 2006; 295 (15): 1809-23.
25. Fikree FF, Berendes HW. Risk factors for term intrauterine growth retardation: community-based study in Karachi Berendes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1994; 72 (4): 581-7.
Recommended Citation
Karima K , Achadi EL .
Status Gizi Ibu dan Berat Badan Lahir Bayi.
Kesmas.
2012;
7(3):
111-119
DOI: 10.21109/kesmas.v7i3.57
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/kesmas/vol7/iss3/3