Abstract

Cakupan pemberian air susu ibu (ASI) eksklusif di Kota Pagar Alam, tahun 2011 sekitar 43% tergolong rendah. Sebaliknya, pemberian susu formula meningkat tiga kali lipat dari 10,3% menjadi 32,5%. Iklan susu formula telah menyentuh bidan swasta dan puskesmas melalui pendekatan produsen susu formula dan pemberian susu formula secara gratis kepada ibu menyusui. Penelitian yang bertujuan mengetahui determinan kegagalan praktik pemberian ASI eksklusif di Kota Pagar Alam Provinsi Sumatera Selatan ini menggunakan desain studi unmatching kasus kontrol. Populasi adalah seluruh ibu yang mempunyai bayi berusia 7-12 bulan. Penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan metode proportional random sampling. Variabel terikat praktik adalah pemberian ASI eksklusif, variabel bebas adalah pemberian sampel susu formula. Ibu yang mendapat sampel susu formula dan yang tidak mendapat dukungan tenaga kesehatan berisiko 3,67 dan 4,2 kali lebih besar untuk tidak memberikan ASI eksklusif.

The coverage of exclusive breastfeeding in the City of Pagar Alam in 2011 was by 43%. Advertising of infant formula has reached privately practicing midwives or health centers. The approach from infant formula manufacturers to midwives in health centers is by providing free milk formula to nursing mothers to be distributed under the pretext of promotion. The objective of this study is to analyze the determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practice failures in the City of Pagar Alam of South Sumatra Province. The population study with an unmatched case-control design was conducted in the City of Pagar Alam. The population was all breastfeeding mothers who had babies in the city of Pagar Alam of South Sumatra Province. The research subjects are breastfeeding mothers who had babies aged 7 - 12 months who selected with proportional random sampling method. The variables of the study included the dependent variable, i.e, the practice of exclusive breastfeeding, the independent variable, i.e, promotion of free milk formula samples. The risk of not exclusively breast feeding amang mothers who had accepted formula milk samples and who absence of support posed by health workers is 3.67 and 4.20 times higher the mothers who had not accepted the formula milk sample and who absence of support posed by heath worker.

References

1. Singh B. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breastfeeding -a case study. European journal of scientific research. 2010; 40: 404_22.

2. Suradi R, Roesli U. Manfaat ASI dan menyusui. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FKUI; 2008.

3. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2011. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2012.

4. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pagar Alam. Profil kesehatan Kota Pagar Alam. Pagar Alam: Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pagar Alam; 2011. 5. Aday LA, Cornelius LJ. Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.

6. Schlesselman JJ. Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. USA: Oxford University Press; 1982.

7. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 3rd. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2004.

8. Szklo M, Nieto F. Epidemilogy: beyond the basics. Maryland: Johns and Bartlett Publishers Inc; 2007.

9. Lemeshow S, Junior DWH, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Besar sampel dalam penelitian kesehatan. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 1997.

10. Suradi R, Roesli U. Manfaat air susu ibu dan menyusui. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2008.

11. American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3): e827-42.

12. Siregar A. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pemberian ASI oleh ibu melahirkan. 2004 [diakses tanggal 6 Februari 2013]. Available from: http://library.usu.ac.id/download/fkm/fkm-arifin.pdf.

13. Siswono. Departemen kesehatan tak mampu awasi promosi PASI sendirian. 2001 [diakses tanggal 24 Mei 2013]. Diunduh dari: http://gizi.net.

14. Green LW. Healthy people: the surgeon general’s report and the prospects. Working for a Healthier America. In: McNemy WJ, editor. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger; 1980.

15. Swanson V, Power KG. Initiation and continuation of breastfeeding: Theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 50(3): 272-82.

16. Ekström A, Guttke K, Lenz M, Hertfelt-Wahn E. Long term effects of professional breastfeeding support: An intervention. International Journal of Nursing Midwifery. 2011; 3(8): 109-17.

17. Taveras EM, Capra AM, Braveman PA, Jensvold NG, Escobar GJ, Lieu TA. Clinician support and psychosocial risk factors associated with breastfeeding discontinuation. Pediatrics. 2003; 112 (1): 108-15.

18. Nakao Y, Moji K, Honda S, Oishi K. Initiation of breastfeeding within 120 minutes after birth is associated with breastfeeding at four months among japanese women. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2008; 3: 1- 7.

19. Chien LY, Tai CJ. Effect of delivery method and timing of breastfeeding initiation on breastfeeding outcomes in Taiwan. Birth. 2007; 34(2): 123- 30.

20. Gijsbers B, Mesters I, Knottnerus JA, van Schayck CP. Factors associated with the duration of exclusive breast-feeding in asthmatic families. Health Education Research. 2008; 23(1): 158-69.

21. Singh G, Chouhan R, Sidhu K. Effect of antenatal expression of breast milk at term in reducing breast feeding failures. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2009; 65(2): 131-3.

22. MacArthur C, Jolly K, Ingram L, Freemantle N, Dennis C-L, Hamburger R, et al. Antenatal peer support workers and initiation of breast feeding: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal. 2009; 338.

Download

Share

COinS