Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah efikasi diri, pusat kendali, dan persepsi tenaga kerja dapat dijadikan prediktor yang akurat untuk memprediksi pencapaian prestasi kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3), serta untuk menguji apakah model pencapaian prestasi K3 yang disusun dengan melibatkan interaksi tenaga kerja dengan lingkungannya cukup tepat. Dengan pendekatan cross sectional, penelitian dilakukan terhadap 200 orang responden pada perusahaan kayu di Kalimantan Timur. Variabel bebas terdiri dari efikasi diri, pusat kendali, dan persepsi tenaga kerja. Variabel tergantung yaitu prestasi K3, sedangkan variabel moderator adalah lingkungan fisik dan kimia kerja. Analisis data menggunakan structural equation model (SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukan efikasi diri dan persepsi tenaga kerja berhubungan positif signifikan dengan prestasi K3, merupakan prediktor yang paling akurat untuk memprediksi pencapaian prestasi K3 (p=0,007 dan p=0,012). Kedua variabel ini memberi sumbangan efektif terhadap prestasi K3 yaitu sebesar 20,2 % dan 17,3 %.

This research was focused on the relationship between worker’s behavior with Occupational Health Safety (OHS) achievement.The purposes of the research is to identify whether worker’s self-efficacy, locus of control and perception can predict OHS achievement, and to examine whether the OHS model engaging workers and work environment interaction are fit. This research was cross sectionally conducted towards 200 respondents in one of plywood plant in West Kalimantan. The independent variable were the worker’s self efficacy, locus of control and perception, while the dependent variable was OHS performance. The moderator variables were physical and chemical work environment. Data analysis used structural equation model. Research findings showed that self efficacy and worker perception have significantly positive relationship with worker’s OHS performance, and could be an accurate predictor to predict OHS performance achievement (p=0.007 and p=0.012), and provided effective contribution to OHS performance as big as 20,2 % and 17,3 % as well.

References

  1. 1. Markanen PA. Kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja di Indonesia. Manila, Philippines: ILO, Subregional office for South-East Asia and The Pacific; 2004.
  2. Wijayanuddin JH, Ahmad AM, Kamsah MZ. Effective occupational health and safety performance measurements. J.ICCBPE/SOMChE. 2005: 702-8.
  3. Organization for Economic and Depelovement Center/OEDC. Safety performance indicators, guidance for industry, public authorities and communities for developing SPI programmes related to chemical acident prevention, preparedness and response. France: OEDC Publications Paris Cedex; 2005.
  4. Suma’mur PK. Keselamatan kerja dan pencegahan kecelakaan. Jakarta: CV Haji Masagung; 1989.
  5. Heinrich HW, Petersen, Nestor R. Industrial accident prevention. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1980.
  6. Bandura A, Schunk DH. Cultivating competence, self efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self motivation. J Per Soc Psych. 1981; 41 (3): 586-98.
  7. Partino. Hubungan efikasi diri dengan unjuk kerja, suatu studi meta analisis. Psikologika J Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi. 1999; 8 : 53- 68.
  8. O’neil BS, Mone MA. Investigating equality sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self efficacy and work place attitudes. J Appl Psych. 1998; 83: 805-16.
  9. Feltz DL, Lirgg CD. Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. J App Psych. 1998; 83: 557-64.
  10. Bandura A. Social fundation of though and action. A Social Theory. New York: Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs; 1986.
  11. Von-Boxtel HW, Monks FJ. General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents . J Youth and Adolesc. 1992; 21 : 169-86.
  12. Chen CJ, Silverthorne C. The impact of locus of control on job stress, job performance and job satisfaction in Taiwan. J Lead & Org Dev. 2008; 29 (7): 572-82.
  13. Spector PE. Behavior in organization as a function of employees locus of control. Psychological Bulletin. 1982; 91: 482-97.
  14. Sitkin SB, Weingart. Determinant of risky decision making behavior. a test of mediating role of risk perception propensity. Acad Manag J. 1995; 38 (3): 1573-92.
  15. Pritchard MJ. Medicine and the behavioral sciences health and allied profesional. London: Edward Arnold; 1986. p.60-73.
  16. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
  17. Ghozali I. Model persamaan struktural, konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS versi 16,0. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2008.
  18. Erickson JA. Corporate culture: the key to safety performance. J Occup Haz. 2000; 62 (4): 45-50.
  19. Betz NE, Taylor KM. Manual for the career decision self efficacy scale and career decision scale self efficacy short form. Columbus: Department of Psichology, The Ohio State University; 2001.
  20. Kusumowardhani RPA. Locus of control sebagai moderator hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi dan kepercayaan terhadap pemimpin dengan komitmen organsisasi [tesis]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2005.
  21. Hehanussa SJ. Pengaruh locus of control terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi penyusunan anggaran dengan kepuasan kerja dan kinerja manajerial [tesis]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2001.
  22. Kreitner R, Sinichi A. The role of locus of control. J Bus Ethics. 2001; (45): 65-76.
  23. Yule S, Flin R, Murdy A. The role of management and safety climate in preventing risk taking behavior at work. Int J Risk Assess and Manag. 2007; (7): 137-51.
  24. Abdullah NAC, Spicket JT, Krassi BR, Dhaliwal SS. Assesing employes perception on health and safety management in public hospitals. Int J Risk Asses and Manag. 2008; 8 (1): 99-129.
  25. Arezes PM. Individual perception of noise exposure and hearing pretection in industry. J Hum Fac and Erg Soc. 2005; 47 (4): 683-92.

Download

Share

COinS