"The Spread of Tuberculosis Cases in the Highlands and Coastal Areas of" by Rapitos Sidiq, Indang Dewata et al.
 

Abstract

The current tuberculosis (TB) worldwide situation is very concerning in terms of the number of cases and the death toll, as well as the environmental factors that contribute to its transmission. This has driven policy decisions that aim to enhance contemporary TB control efforts. This study aimed to map the pattern of TB spread based on geographic location, particularly in the highland and coastal areas of Padang City, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia. This study employed a quantitative descriptive analysis using secondary data from 6 primary health care (PHC) from April 2022 to March 2023, comprising 896 cases. Data analysis was conducted using the ArcGIS program, as well as applying Nearest Neighbor Analysis across the PHC areas. The results indicated that TB cases were more prevalent in coastal areas. The distribution pattern was comparable between the mountainous and coastal areas, as indicated by similar clusters. Geographic differences did not affect the TB transmission pattern in Padang City. The reason for the occurrence of transmission was likely due to close contact, spreading from one person to another. Therefore, more effective education efforts, case detection, and restriction of TB patient movement are necessary to address the issue of interest.

References

1. Christanto A. Paradigma baru tuberkulosis pada era Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) dan implikasinya di Indonesia. CDK Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2018; 45 (1): 57–60. DOI: 10.55175/cdk.v45i1.843.

2. Khanna A, Saha R, Ahmad N. National TB elimination programme - What has changed. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2022; 42 (2023): 103-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.10.008.

3. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis reports 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

4. Divisi Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit. Profil Kesehatan Kota Padang Tahun 2022. Padang: Dinas Kesehatan Kota Padang; 2023.

5. Amaliah L, Rufaedah AA, Nurcahyati S, et al. The relationship between the physical home environment and the event of tuberculosis. World J Adv Res Rev. 2022; 14 (3): 623–628. DOI: Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2022.14.3.0627.

6. Siddalingaiah N, Chawla K, Nagaraja SB, et al. Risk factors for the development of tuberculosis among the pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182: 3007–3019. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04988-0.

7. Siregar RJ, Yusuf SF, Fernaldy D. The relationship between physical conditions of the house and the incidence of tuberculosis. IJPHE. 2022; 1 (1): 1–5. DOI: 10.55299/ijphe.v1i1.2.

8. Agrawal N, Solanki VS, Pare B, et al. Current trends in nanocatalysis for green chemistry and its applications- a mini-review. Current Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2023; 41: 100788. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100788.

9. Musfirah, Nurfita D, Rangkuti AF. Analysis of Healthy Housing and TB Prevalence in Yogyakarta City. Kemas. 2022; 17 (3): 405–414. DOI: 10.15294/kemas.v17i3.28692.

10. Atkins S, Heimo L, Carter D, et al. The socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on children and adolescents: A scoping review and conceptual framework. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22: 2153. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14579-7.

11. Dey A, Roy I, Chakrabartty AK, et al. Changing patterns of household transmission of tuberculosis in an eastern state of India: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Tuberc. 2022; 69 (4): 682–689. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2022.03.001.

12. Horton KC, Hoey AL, Béraud G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in social contact patterns and implications for tuberculosis transmission and control. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26 (5): 910–919. DOI: 10.3201/eid2605.190574.

13. Quan DH, Kwong AJ, Hansbro PM, et al. No smoke without fire: The impact of cigarette smoking on the immune control of tuberculosis. Eur Respir Rev. 2022; 31 (164): 210252. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0252-2021.

14. Chen X, Du L, Wu R, et al. Tuberculosis-related stigma and its determinants in Dalian, Northeast China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 6. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10055-2.

15. Lönnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, et al. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: The role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 68 (12): 2240–2246. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.041.

16. Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 11 (11): CD006207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.

17. Najafizada M, Rahman A, Taufique Q, et al. Social determinants of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A scoping review and research gaps. Indian J Tuberc. 2021; 68 (1): 99–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.09.016.

18. Wardani DWSR, Wahono EP. Socio-economic position as risk factor of childhood tuberculosis. E3S Web Conf. 2021; 317: 01036. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131701036.

19. Noppert GA, Hegde ST, Kubale JT. Exposure, susceptibility, and recovery: A framework for examining the intersection of the social and physical environments and infectious disease risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2023 24; 192 (3): 475-482. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac186.

20. Li M, Guo M, Peng Y, et al. High proportion of tuberculosis transmission among social contacts in rural China: A 12-year prospective population-based genomic epidemiological study. Emerg Microbe Infect. 2022; 11 (1): 2102–2111. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2112912.

21. Martinez L, Shen Y, Mupere E, et al. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in households and the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2017; 185 (12): 1327–1339. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx025.

22. Yang DL, Li W, Pan MH, et al. Spatial analysis and influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis among students in Nanning, during 2012–2018. PLoS One. 2022; 17 (5): e0268472. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268472.

23. Gao C, Wang Y, Hu Z, et al. Study on the associations between meteorological factors and the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in Xinjiang, China. Atmosphere (Basel). 2022; 13 (4): 533. DOI: 10.3390/atmos13040533.

24. Marianelli C, Verrubbi V, Ciarello FP, et al. Geo-epidemiology of animal tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis genotypes in livestock in a small, high-incidence area in Sicily, Italy. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1107396. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1107396.

25. Leining LM, Gatchalian SR, Gunter SM, et al. Geospatial and hot spot analysis of paediatric tuberculosis infection in Bohol, Philippines. Epidemiol Infect. 2020; 148: e89. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820000795.

26. Gelaw Y, Yu W, Magalhaes RJ, et al. Effect of temperature and altitude difference on tuberculosis notification: A systematic review. J Glob Infect Dis. 2019; 11 (2): 63–68. DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_95_18.

27. Coleman M, Martinez L, Theron G, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in high-incidence settings—new paradigms and insights. Pathogens. 2022; 11 (11): 1228. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11111228.

28. Freitas MYGS, Almeida VRSD, Nascimento DCD, et al. Socioeconomic context in Brazil and tuberculosis risk factors: What has changed? Int J Heal Sci. 2022; 2 (12): 2–9. DOI: 10.22533/at.ed.1592122223023.

29. Hernández B, Voll S, Lewis NA, et al. Comparisons of disease cluster patterns, prevalence and health factors in the USA, Canada, England and Ireland. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21 (1): 1674. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11706-8.

30. Rao M, Johnson A. Impact of population density and elevation on tuberculosis spread and transmission in Maharashtra, India. J Emerg Investig. 2021; 4: 1–5. DOI: 10.59720/21-056.

31. Emery JC, Dodd PJ, Banu S, et al. Estimating the contribution of subclinical tuberculosis disease to transmission – an individual patient data analysis from prevalence surveys. eLife. 2023; 12: e82469. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.82469.

32. Daftary A, Frick M, Venkatesan N, et al. Fighting TB stigma: We need to apply lessons learnt from HIV activism. BMJ Glob Health. 2017; 2: e000515. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000515.

33. Bashorun AO, Linda C, Omoleke S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards tuberculosis in Gambia: A nation-wide cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 1566. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09685-3.

34. Medina-Marino A, Bezuidenhout D, Ngcelwane N, et al. Qualitative identification of intervention preferences to support men’s engagement and retention in TB care in South Africa. Am J Mens Health. 2022; 16 (5): 15579883221129349. DOI: 10.1177/15579883221129349.

35. Sukmawati, Amiruddin EE, Meilani N. Analysis of the relationship between the physical conditions of the house, smoking and the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in Central Buton. IJSMR. 2023; 1 (5): 361–374. DOI: 10.55927/ijsmr.v1i5.4373.

36. Henson RM, Ortigoza A, Folgar KM, et al. Evaluating the health effects of place-based slum upgrading physical environment interventions: A systematic review (2012–2018). Soc Sci Med. 2020; 261: 113102. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113102.

37. Anupriya, Srivastava GN, Mishra AP. The association of household crowding and tuberculosis incidence among women of Varanasi City: A study in medical geography. Natl Geogr J India. 2019; 65 (2): 198–205.

38. Amoori N, Cheraghian B, Amini P, et al. Social contact patterns associated with tuberculosis: A case-control study in Southwest Iran. J Prev Med Public Health. 2022; 55 (5): 485–491. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.22.335.

39. Burke RM, Nliwasa M, Feasey HRA, et al. Community-based active case-finding interventions for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Lancet Public Health. 2021; 6 (5): e283-e299. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00033-5.

40. Paleckyte A, Dissanayake O, Mpagama S, et al. Reducing the risk of tuberculosis transmission for HCWs in high incidence settings. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021; 10: 106. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00975-y.

Share

COinS