Abstract

The Open Defecation Free (ODF) program was initiated by the government to increase access to healthy latrines. This study aimed to evaluate the ODF program using the CIPP evaluation model. A qualitative and exploratory descriptive method was adopted to investigate informants' experiences regarding the program's implementation. Data was explored through semi-structured interviews with 17 informants and analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that the program was crucial as numerous people engaged in open defecation due to economic, geographical, cultural, and knowledge factors. The absence of ODF policy was due to lack of priority, limited government and private support, insufficient human resources, inadequate infrastructure, and budget constraints. The ODF program was considered unimportant and tended to follow stunting programs, reflecting the low commitment. The biggest opportunity was implementing an integrated ODF with a stunting reduction program by allocating a special budget. Thus, primary health care is expected to optimize activities further to trigger the ODF program within the environment.

References

1. Zuin V, Delaire C, Peletz R, et al. Policy diffusion in the rural sanitation sector: Lessons from community-led total sanitation (CLTS). World Dev. 2019; 124: 104643. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104643.

2. Sigler R, Mahmoudi L, Graham JP. Analysis of behavioral change techniques in community-led total sanitation programs. Health Promot Int. 2015; 30 (1): 16-28. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau073.

3. Zeleke DA, Gelaye KA, Mekonnen FA. Community-led total sanitation and the rate of latrine ownership. BMC Res Notes. 2019; 12 (1): 1-5. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4066-x.

4. World Health Organization. Diarrhoea: Overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

5. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2020.

6. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Laporan riset kesehatan dasar tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2019.

7. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2021.

8. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Sistem Informasi Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2023.

9. Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2014 tentang Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2014.

10. Nugraha MF. Dampak program sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat (STBM) pilar pertama di Desa Gucialit Kecamatan Gucialit Kabupaten Lumajang. Kebijak Manaj Publik. 2015; 3 (2): 44-53.

11. Syam S, Asriani A. Penerapan sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat (STBM) pilar 1 stop buang air besar sembarangan (Stop BABS) dengan kejadian penyakit diare di Kelurahan Lakkang Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar. Sulolipu Media Komun Sivitas Akad Masy. 2019; 19 (1): 109-119. DOI: 10.32382/sulolipu.v19i1.1035.

12. Muhlisan M, Joko T, Dewanti NA. Perbedaan faktor-faktor kejadian diare pada balita di desa ODF (Open Defecation Free) dan non-ODF di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sape Kabupaten Bima. J Kesehat Masy. 2021; 9 (2): 208–214. DOI: 10.14710/jkm.v9i2.28714.

13. Warju W. Educational program evaluation using CIPP model. INVOTEC. 2016; 12 (1): 36-42. DOI: 10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502.

14. Hakan K, Seval F. CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011; 15: 592–599. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146.

15. Zhang G, Zeller N, Griffith R, et al. Using the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation model as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2011; 15 (4): 57-83.

16. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2020.

17. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. Laporan Bulanan Data Kesakitan. Tanjung Jabung Timur: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur; 2023.

18. Prayitno J, Widati S. Study of the health promotion strategy of Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) in Kejawan Putih Tambak Village Surabaya City. JKL. 2018; 10 (3): 267-275. DOI: 10.20473/jkl.v10i3.2018.267-275.

19. Syahrir S, Syamsul M, Aswadi, et al. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kepemilikan jamban keluarga di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Pertiwi Kota Makassar. Higiene. 2019; 5 (1): 52-59. DOI: 10.24252/higiene.v5i1.9862.

20. Sugiharto M, Nurhayati. Upaya pemerintah daerah untuk meningkatkan cakupan desa ODF (Open Defecation Free) di Kabupaten Muaro Jambi, Sumedang dan Lombok Barat. Buletin Penelit Sist Kesehat. 2019; 22 (1): 62–71.

21. Meri F, Dewi RRK. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kepemilikan jamban sehat oleh rumah tangga di Indonesia (literature review). Jumantik J Mhs Penelit Kesehat. 2020; 7 (1): 1-15. DOI: 10.29406/jjum.v7i2.2558.

22. Kurniawan D, Khotimah H. Peraturan desa dan sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat pada open defecation free. J Penelit Perawat Prof. 2019; 1 (1): 81-88. DOI: 10.37287/jppp.v1i1.20.

23. Manurung RA. Peran masyarakat dan swasta dalam pengelolaan sampah di kota kecil Jawa Tengah (studi kasus: kawasan Kupang Kidul, Kota Ambarawa). J Wil Lingkung. 2013; 1 (3): 227-244. DOI: 10.14710/jwl.1.3.227-244.

24. Kurniawati RD, Saleha AM. Analisis pengetahuan, sikap dan peran petugas kesehatan dengan keikutsertaan dalam pemicuan stop BABS. J Ilmu Kesehat Masy. 2020; 9 (2): 99-108. DOI: 10.33221/jikm.v9i02.527.

25. Syarifuddin S, Bachri AA, Arifin S. Kajian efektivitas program sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat berdasarkan karakteristik lingkungan dan evaluasi program di Kabupaten Banjar. J Berk Kesehat. 2017; 3 (1): 1-8. DOI: 10.20527/jbk.v3i1.4846.

26. Samosir K, Ramadhan FS. Peranan perilaku, kebiasaan dan dukungan tokoh masyarakat terhadap kepemilikan jamban sehat di pesisir Kampung Bugis Kota Tanjungpinang. Sanitasi. 2020; 11 (1): 1–8. DOI: 10.29238/sanitasi.v11i1.923.

27. Davik FI. Evaluasi program sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat pilar stop BABS di Puskesmas Kabupaten Probolinggo. Indones J Health Adm J Adm Kesehat Indones. 2016; 4 (2): 107-116. DOI: 10.20473/jaki.v4i2.2016.107-116.

28. Harter M, Mosch S, Mosler HJ. How does community-led total sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 387. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5287-y.

29. Mustafidah L, Suhartono S, Purnaweni H. Analisis pelaksanaan program sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat pada pilar pertama di tingkat Puskesmas Kabupaten Demak. JKM J Kesehat Masy Cendekia Utama. 2020; 7 (2): 25-37. DOI: 10.31596/jkm.v7i2.499.

30. Sutiyono, Shaluhiyah Z, Purnami CT. The implementation analysis of community-based total sanitation program as strategy for improving clean and healthy living behavior by primary health care center workers in Grobogan District. J Manaj Kesehat Indones. 2014; 02 (01): 27-35.

31. Crocker J, Geremew A, Atalie F, et al Teachers and sanitation promotion: An assessment of community-led total sanitation in Ethiopia. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50 (12): 6517–6525. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01021.

32. Novotný J, Kolomazníková J, Humňalová H. The role of perceived social norms in rural sanitation: An explorative study from infrastructure-restricted settings of South Ethiopia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14 (7): 1-17. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14070794.

33. Papafilippou N, Templeton M, Ali M. Technical note: Is there a role for external technical support in the community-led total sanitation (CLTS) approach? Int Dev Plan Rev. 2011; 33 (1): 81–94. DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2011.5.

34. Ficek F, Novotný J. Comprehending practitioners’ assessments of community-led total sanitation. Health Promot Int. 2019; 34 (6): e129-e138. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day070.

35. Hanchett S, Krieger L, Kahn MH, et al. Long-term sustainability of improved sanitation in rural Bangladesh. Water Sanit Prog Tech Paper WSP. Washington DC: World Bank; 2011.

36. Radin M, Jeuland M, Wang H, et al. Benefit–cost analysis of community-led total sanitation: Incorporating results from recent evaluations. J Benefit Cost Anal. 2020; 11 (3): 380–417. DOI: 10.1017/bca.2020.6.

37. Soedjono ES, Fitriani N, Yuniarto A, et al. Provision of healthy toilet for low income community based on community empowerment in Kelurahan Kebonsari, Surabaya City, towards Indonesia open defecation free (ODF) in 2019. In: AIP Conf Proc. 2017; 1903: 040012. DOI: 10.1063/1.5011531.

38. Toibah S, Wibawa S, Mahendradi R. Kinerja program pembangunan jamban sehat di Kecamatan Kaliwiro. JMAN J Mhs Administrasi Negara. 2018; 2 (1): 159-168.

39. Dharmayanti I, Tjandrarini DH. Peran lingkungan dan individu terhadap masalah diare di Pulau Jawa dan Bali. J Ekologi Kesehat. 2020; 19 (2): 84–93. DOI: 10.22435/jek.v19i2.3192.

40. Utami N, Luthfiana N. Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kejadian diare pada anak. Majority. 2016; 5 (4): 101-106.

Download

Share

COinS