Abstract

Safety Resilience discusses how a work process can run properly not only aims at preventing adverse events, but also increasing work productivity and effectiveness by increasing resilience. The concept of resilience has been widely suggested as safety management due to its ability to support organizations to continue operating even when facing unexpected demands or scale disruptions by improving their day-to-day performance. This study used a systematic literature review to explore the implementation of safety resilience in various industries. The results showed that 50% of articles used the Resilience Assessment Grid instrument to measure safety resilience in the workplace. In brief, increased safety resilience positively improves work performance and organizational safety.

References

1. Hollnagel E, Wears R, Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. University of Southern Denmark, University of Florida, USA, and Macquire University, Australia; 2015. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4051.5282.

2. Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. Florida: CRC Press; 2014.

3. Kellogg KM, Hettinger Z, Shah M, et al. Our current approach to root cause analysis: Is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety? BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26 (5): 381–387. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991.

4. Rae AJ, Provan DJ, Weber DE, et al. Safety clutter: The accumulation and persistence of ‘safety’ work that does not contribute to operational safety. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2018; 16 (2): 194–211. DOI: 10.1080/14773996.2018.1491147.

5. Halligan D, Janes G, Conner M, et al. Identifying Safety Practices Perceived as Low Value: An Exploratory Survey of Healthcare Staff in the United Kingdom and Australia. J Patient Saf. 2023; 19 (2): 143-150. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001091.

6. Hollnagel E. Safety-II in Practice Developing the Resilience Potentials. New York: Routledge; 2018.

7. Ham DH. Safety-II and Resilience Engineering in a Nutshell: An Introductory Guide to Their Concepts and Methods. Saf Health Work. 2021; 12 (1): 10-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.11.004.

8. Lay E, Branlat M, Woods Z. A practitioner's experiences operationalizing resilience engineering. Realib Eng Syst Saf. 2015; 141: 63-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.015.

9. Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears RL. Delivering Resilient Health Care. London: Routledge; 2018. DOI: 10.4324/9780429469695.

10. Patriarca R, Bergström J, Di Gravio G, et al. Resilience engineering: Current status of the research and future challenges. Saf Sci. 2018; 102: 79–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005.

11. Talubo JP, Morse S, Saroj D. Whose resilience matters? A socio-ecological systems approach to defining and assessing disaster resilience for small islands. Environ Chall. 2022; 7: 100511. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.10051.

12. Lloyd’s Register Foundation. Foresight Review of Resilience Engineering: designing for the expected and unexpected. London: Lloyd’s Register Foundation; 2015.

13. Woods DD. Resilience Engineering. Hollnagel E (ed.). London: CRC Press; 2017. DOI: 10.1201/9781315605685.

14. Pęciłło M. The concept of resilience in OSH management: A review of approaches. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016; 22 (2): 291-300. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1126142.

15. Righi AW, Saurin TA, Wachs P. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and A research agenda proposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2015; 141: 142–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007.

16. Martínez-Aires MD, López-Alonso M, Martínez-Rojas M. Building information modeling and safety management: A systematic review. Saf Sci. 2018; 101: 11–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.015.

17. Shaffril HAM, Samah AA, Samsuddin SF, et al. Mirror-mirror on the wall, what climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian’s fishermen of all? J Clean Prod. 2019; 232: 104–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.262.

18. Ismail SN, Ramli A, Aziz HA. Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach. Resour Policy. 2021; 74: 102250. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102250.

19. Safi M, Thude BR, Brandt F, et al. The resilient potential behaviours in an Internal Medicine Department: Application of resilience assessment grid. PLoS One. 2022; 17 (10): e0276178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276178.

20. Chuang S, Ou JC, Ma HP. Measurement of resilience potentials in emergency departments: Applications of a tailored resilience assessment grid. Saf Sci. 2020; 121: 385–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.012.

21. Peñaloza GA, Saurin TA, Formoso CT. Monitoring complexity and resilience in construction projects: The contribution of safety performance measurement systems. Appl Ergon. 2020; 82: 102978. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102978.

22. Klockner K, Meredith P. Measuring resilience potentials: A pilot program using the resilience assessment grid. Saf. 2020; 6 (4): 51. DOI: 10.3390/safety6040051.

23. Peñaloza GA, Formoso CT, Saurin TA. A resilience engineering-based framework for assessing safety performance measurement systems: A study in the construction industry. Saf Sci. 2021; 142: 105364. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105364.

24. Falegnami A, Bilotta F, Pugliese F, et al. A multicountry comparative survey about organizational resilience in anaesthesia. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018; 24 (6): 1347-1357. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13054.

25. Djunaidi Z, Tantia AA, Wirawan M. Analysis of the Safety Resilience Implementation in the Maritime Industry at Public and Private Companies (A Case Study in Indonesia). Saf. 2021; 7 (3): 56. DOI: 10.3390/safety7030056.

26. Bertoni VB, Saurin TA, Fogliatto FS. How to identify key players that contribute to resilient performance: A social network analysis perspective. Saf Sci. 2022; 148: 105648. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105648

27. Bertoni VB, Saurin TA, Fogliatto FS, et al. Monitor, anticipate, respond, and learn: Developing and interpreting a multilayer social network of resilience abilities. Saf Sci. 2021; 136: 105148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105148.

28. Pęciłło M. Identification of gaps in safety management systems from the resilience engineering perspective in upper and lower-tier enterprises. Saf Sci. 2020; 130: 104851. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104851.

29. Rubio-Romero JC, Pardo-Ferreira M del C, De la Varga-Salto J, et al. Composite leading indicator to assess the resilience engineering in occupational health & safety in municipal solid waste management companies. Saf Sci. 2018; 108: 161–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.014.

30. Shirali GA, Mohammadfam I, Ebrahimipour V. A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: A case study in a process industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2013; 119: 88–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.003.

31. de Linhares TQ, Maia YL, Ferreira Frutuoso e Melo PF. The phased application of STAMP, FRAM and RAG as a strategy to improve complex sociotechnical system safety. Prog Nucl Energy. 2021; 131: 103571. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103571.

32. Kim JT, Park J, Kim J, et al. Development of a quantitative resilience model for nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 2018; 122: 175–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.08.042.

33. Al Mawli B, Al Alawi M, Elazouni A, et al. Construction SMEs safety challenges in water sector in Oman. Saf Sci. 2021; 136: 105156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105156.

34. Adjekum DK, Tous MF. Assessing the relationship between organizational management factors and a resilient safety culture in a collegiate aviation program with Safety Management Systems (SMS). Saf Sci. 2020; 131: 104909. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104909.

35. Shirali G, Shekari M, Angali KA. Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems. Saf Health Work. 2018; 9 (3): 296–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010.

36. Zhang K, Wang L, Liu J, et al. Resilience Capacity Evaluation for the Safety Management System of Power Grid Enterprise Based on AHP-MEE Model. Math Probl Eng. 2022; 8065814. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8065814.

37. Azadeh A, Asadzadeh SM, Tanhaeean M. A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2017; 47: 151–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.028.

38. Shirali GA, Shekari M, Angali KA. Quantitative assessment of resilience safety culture using principal components analysis and numerical taxonomy: A case study in a petrochemical plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2016; 40: 277–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.007 39.Saurin TA, Carim Júnior GC. Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: A case study of an electricity distributor. Saf Sci. 2011; 49 (2): 355–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.017.

40. Azadeh A, Zarrin M. An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives. Saf Sci. 2016; 89: 55–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.001.

Download

Share

COinS