Abstract

Online motorcycle taxi riders, a vulnerable group on the road, are more susceptible to serious injury than non-motorcycle riders. This study analyzed a correlation between daily income targets, passenger pressure, risk perception, safety attitudes, and risky riding behavior. This cross-sectional study used a semi-quantitative approach by collecting online-based questionnaires from 500 online motorcycle taxi riders in Jakarta, and 50 of them were obtained through offline interviews. The findings revealed a significant relationship between daily income targets, passenger pressure, risk perception (danger level, stochastic evaluation, and safety priority), safety attitudes (pragmatic attitude to rule violations and dissatisfaction with traffic rules), and risky riding behavior, with a p-value of <0.05. In particular, a pragmatic attitude to rule violations was the most impactful on risky riding behavior. Online motorcycle taxi companies should provide regular training on traffic laws and safe riding practices to improve road safety. This holistic approach may enhance safety through education, passenger awareness, and rigorous management.

References

1. Masachi J. Countries with the Highest Motorbike Usage. WorldAtlas; 2019. 2. Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Jumlah Data Kendaraan Per Polda. Jakarta: Digital Korlantas Polisi Republik Indonesia; 2023. 3. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis Kendaraan (Unit) di Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2020-2022. Jakarta: BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta; 2023. 4. Nguyen-Phuoc DQ, De Gruyter C, Nguyen HA, et al. Risky behaviours associated with traffic crashes among app-based motorcycle taxi drivers in Vietnam. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2020; 70: 249–259. 5. Shafie SAM, Leong LV, Hao ST, et al. Assessing the risky riding behavior and the effect of entrance behavior of right-turning motorcyclists on critical gap at T-junctions. Trans Eng. 2022; 10: 100154. 6. United States Federal Highway Administration. The National Definition For Serious Injuries MMUCC 4th Edition. United States Federal Highway Administration; 2022. 7. World Health Organization. WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. 8. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jumlah Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Menurut Jenis Kendaraan Bermotor di Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta; 2021. 9. Chung Y, Song T-J, Yoon B-J. Injury severity in delivery-motorcycle to vehicle crashes in the Seoul metropolitan area. Accid Anal Prev. 2014; 62: 79–86. 10. Zheng Y, Ma Y, Guo L, et al. Crash Involvement and Risky Riding Behaviors among Delivery Riders in China: The Role of Working Conditions. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2019; 2673: 1011–1022. 11. Made D, Wedagama P. Analysing Self-Reported Risky Behaviours of Motorcyclists in Bali using Structural Equation Modelling. J Eastern Asia SocTransp Stud. 2015; 11: 2015–2027. 12. Cheng ASK, Liu KPY, Tulliani N. Relationship between driving-violation behaviours and risk perception in motorcycle accidents. Hong Kong J OccupTher. 2015; 25: 32–38. 13. Hung BKH. Road safety attitudes, perceptions and behaviours of taxi drivers in Hong Kong. HKIE Transact. 2018; 25: 255–272. 14. Kummeneje AM, Rundmo T. Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2020; 69: 135–150. 15. Alvisyahri A, Anggraini R, Sugiarto S. Motorcyclist Perceptions on Road Safety Considering Awareness, Riding Behavior, and Risk-Taking Behavior, asLatent Variables. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020; 917: 012035. 16. Susilo YO, Joewono TB, Vandebona U. Reasons underlying behaviour of motorcyclists disregarding traffic regulations in urban areas of Indonesia. Accid Anal Prev. 2015; 75: 272–284. 17. Wang T, Xie S, Ye X, et al. Analyzing E-Bikers’ Risky Riding Behaviors, Safety Attitudes, Risk Perception, and Riding Confidence with the Structural Equation Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 4763. 18. Chouhan SS, Kathuria A, Sekhar CR. Examining risky riding behavior in India using Motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire. Accid Anal Prev 2021; 160: 106312. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106312 19. Chaudhry B, Yasar A-U-H, El-Amine S, et al. Passenger Safety in Ride-Sharing Services. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018; 130: 1044–1050. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.146 20. Yu S, Tsai W-D. The effects of road safety education on the occurrence of motorcycle violations and accidents for novice riders: An analysis of population-based data. Accid Anal Prev. 2021; 163: 106457. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106457 21. Kim BJ, Kim S, Kim S. Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy: Testing Three Causal Models of Risk Perception, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Energy Context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 7403. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207403 22. Khaliwa AM, Hafia A, Putri N, et al. Interview of Daily Income Targets and Passenger Pressure on Risky Riding Behavior among Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Jakarta 2023. 23. Faridah S. Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Masyarakat Bekerja Menjadi Driver Ojek Online sebagai Mata Pencaharian Ekonomi di Jakarta [Undergraduate Thesis]. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hdayatullah; 2019. 157 p.

Download

Share

COinS