"Workers’ Characteristics of Hearing Loss at Soekarno-Hatta Internation" by Andrew Ebeneizer Timanta, Budi Haryanto et al.
 

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and factors of worker behavior, including age, the use of ear protection, work duration, a record of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, work rotation, and noise hazards involved in hearing loss in PT. X at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport, Indonesia. A cross-sectional study from May 2017 to June 2017 involved 73 workers in the power service area (TZ Unit) exposed to noise levels ≥85 dBA, using an audiometry test for hearing loss and Sound Level Meter for noise hazards was conducted. The Chi-square test showed a significant correlation between age (OR 8.4, 95% Cl = 1.6-44.1), work duration (OR 7.6, 95% Cl = 0.9-67.2), and the use of ear protection (OR 7.8, 95% Cl = 1.4-44.2) with hearing loss in workers in the power service area. The multivariate analysis revealed that workers exposed to a noise level of 85 dBA had a 1.7 times greater risk of hearing loss than workers exposed to a noise level of age, work duration, use of ear protection, medical history, and work rotation.

References

1. World Health Organization. Addressing The Rising Prevalence of Hearing Loss. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

2. Olusanya BO, Davis AC, Hoffman HJ. Hearing loss: Rising prevalence and impact. Bull World Health Organ. 2019; 97 (10): 646-646A. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.19.224683

3. Haile LM, Kamenov K, Briant PS, et al. Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2021; 397 (10278): 996– 1009. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00516-X

4. Anggraeni R, Carosone-Link P, Djelantik B, et al. Otitis media related hearing loss in Indonesian school children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinol. 2019; 125: 44–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.06.019

5. Chen KH, Su SB, Chen KT. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020; 25: 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0

6. Marisdayana R, Suhartono S, Nurjazuli N. Hubungan Intensitas Paparan Bising Dan Masa Kerja Dengan Gangguan Pendengaran Pada Karyawan PT. X. J Kesehat Lingkung Indonesia. 2016; 15 (1): 22-27. DOI: 10.14710/jkli.15.1.22-27

7. Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Program. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor; 2008.

8. Noweir M, Zytoon M. Occupational exposure to noise and hearing thresholds among civilian aircraft maintenance workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2013; 43 (6): 495-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.001

9. Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menaker Nomor PER.13/MEN/X/2011 tentang Nilai Ambang Batas Faktor Fisika Dan Faktor Kimia Di Tempat Kerja. Jakarta: Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia; 2011.

10. Mitaran P. Tingkat Kebisingan dan Gangguan Pendengaran pada Pekerja di Pelabuhan Udara El Tari Kupang 2016 [Thesis]. Depok: Universitas Indonesia; 2017, 89 p.

11. Melese M, Adugna DG, Mulat B, Adera A. Hearing loss and its associated factors among metal workshop workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2022; 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.919239

12. Rasasoran DR, Atil A, Jeffree MS, et al. Hearing loss and associated factors among noise-exposed workers in palm oil mills. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021; 14: 3653–3658. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S319858

13. Achmadi, UF. Upaya Kesehatan Kerja Sektor Informal di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013.

14. Wattamwar K, Qian ZJ, Otter J, et al. Increases in the Rate of AgeRelated Hearing Loss in the Older Old. JAMA Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143 (1): 41–45. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2661

15. Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 29 Tahun 2015 tentang Cara Pendaftaran Kepesertaan, Pembayaran, dan Penghentian Manfaat Jaminan Pensiun. Jakarta: Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia; 2015.

16. Davies EMM, Van der Heijden BIJM, Flynn M. Job satisfaction, retirement attitude and intended retirement age: A conditional process analysis across workers’ level of household income. Front Psychol. 2017; 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00891

17. Zaw AK, Myat AM, Thandar M, et al. Assessment of Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss Among Workers in Textile Mill (Thamine), Myanmar: A Cross-Sectional Study. Safety Health Work. 2020; 11 (2): 199–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.04.002

18. Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Occupational Noise Exposure: Overview. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor; 2008.

19. Rinawati S, Utari S, Sumardiyono. Perbedaan Gangguan Pendengaran Pekerja Terpapar Bising Industri Di Surakarta Antara Pekerja Memakai Alat Pelindung Telinga Dan Pekerja Tidak Memakai Alat Pelindung Telinga. Purwokerto: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto; 2015.

20. Puspitasari I. Studi Aplikasi Alat Pelindung Diri sebagai Faktor Risiko Gangguan Pendengaran Karyawan Unit Produksi PT. Semen Tonasa [Thesis]. Makassar: Hasanuddin University; 2014.

21. Tambunan STB. Kebisingan di Tempat Kerja (Occupational Noise). 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset; 2005.

22. Kamal AA, Junaini SN, Hashim AH, et al. The enhancement of OSH training with an augmented reality-based App. Int J Onl Eng. 2021; 17 (13): 120-134. DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v17i13.24517

23. Hatzigiannakoglou PD, Okalidou A. Development of an auditory rehabilitation tool for children with cochlear implants through a mobilebased VR and AR serious game. Int J Onl Eng. 2019; 15 (02): 81-90. DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v15i02.9709

24. Forouharmajd F, Nazaryan K, Fuente A, et al. The Efficiency of Hearing Protective Devices against Occupational Low Frequency Noise in Comparison to the New Subjective Suggested Method. Int J Prev Med. 2022; 13: 143. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_700_20

25. Sulistiadi W, Nurhidayah S, Asyary A. Evaluating the Management Information System of Integrated Medical Emergency Care in Batang Regency, Indonesia. Int. J. Onl. Eng. 2020; 16 (07): 75-85. DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v16i08.14725

Download

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 98
    • Abstract Views: 34
  • Captures
    • Readers: 12
  • Mentions
    • News Mentions: 1
see details

Share

COinS