Abstract

Measles is one of the main causes of global mortality in the under-fives. The existence of groups that reject immunization caused a decrease in immunization coverage. Anti-vaccine messages are widely delivered on social media. Identification of vaccine rejection behavior can be used as the basis to formulate effective program strategies. The design of this study used rapid assessment procedures (RAP). The informants were from two anti-vaccine communities in the Facebook group. In-depth interviews and observations were done for data collection, and data analysis was performed using the Framework Method. The results found that determinants, such as knowledge, beliefs in health behavior and disease prevention, religion, culture, and government policies play a role in shaping informants’ perceptions of vaccines and disease risks. The design factors of vaccination programs and the reliability of vaccine producing sources were found to be inhibiting factors for informants to receive vaccines. Also, experience with vaccines, health workers' role, and lobbying by anti vaccine groups strengthened informants' attitude who initially doubted vaccines, causing them to reject vaccines ultimately. It is suggested to the Ministry of Health to improve vaccination campaigns through social media, conduct vaccine development study, and increase health workers' knowledge related to vaccines and make their communication techniques more effective.

References

1. World Health Organization. Fact sheet: measles; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 17].

2. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. Situasi imunisasi di Indonesia (the situation of immunization in Indonesia). Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia; 2016. p. 6.

3. World Health Organization. Immunization coverage-fact sheet no. 378; 2015.

4. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. Profil kesehatan 2014 (Health Profile 2014); 2014.

5. Dubé E, Gagnon D, Nickels E, Jeram S, Schuster M. Mapping vaccine hesitancy-country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon. Vaccine. 2014 [cited 2020 April 25]; 32 (49): 6649-54.

6. Yufika A, Wagner AL, Nawawi Y, Wahyuniati N, Anwar S, Yusri F, et al. Parents’ hesitancy toward vaccination in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2020 [cited 2020 April 25]; 38 (11): 2592-9.

7. Mnookin S. The panic virus: a true story of medicine, science, and fear. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2011.

8. Dube E, Vivion M, and MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2015 [cited 2020 April 25]; 14 (1): 99-117.

9. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DMD, Paterson P. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007-2012. Vaccine. 2014; 32 (19): 2150-9.

10. Benecke O, and DeYoung SE. Anti-vaccine decision-making and measles resurgence in the United States. Global Pediatric Health. 2019 [cited 2020 April 25]; 6: 1-5.

11. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm–an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012 [cited 2020 April 25]; 30 (25): 3778–89.

12. Kelly L, Jenkinson C, and Ziebland S. Measuring the effects of online health information for patients: item generation for an e-health impact questionnaire. Patients Education and Counseling. 2013 [cited 2020 April 25]; 93 (3): 433-8.

13. NapoleonCat. Facebook users in Indonesia-April 2020. Napoleon Sp.zo.; 2020.

14. Syiroj ATR, Pardosi JF, and Heywood AE. Exploring parents’ reasons for incomplete childhood immunization in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2019 [cited 2020 April 25]; 37 (43): 6486-93.

15. de Oliveira JF. The effect of the internet on the patient-doctor relationship in a hospital in the city of Sao Paulo. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management. 2014 [cited 2020 April 25]. 11: 327-44.

16. Wahyunarni YI, Ahmad RA, and Triratnawati A. Persepsi masyarakat terhadap imunisasi campak di Kabupaten Sleman (community perceptions of measles immunization in Sleman Regency). Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat. 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. 32 (8): 281-6.

17. World Health Organization. Report of the sage working group on vaccine hesitancy. Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE); 2014.

18. Farhikhtah A, Hohfeld L, Schmall A, Ahimbisibwe M, Saliu I, Hachhethu K, et al. Rapid assessment procedures formative research approach used to design a mobile-technology enhanced social and behavior change communication nutrition strategy in Nigeria (P16-053- 19). Current Developments in Nutrition. 2019 [cited 2020 April 25]; 3 (Suppl 1).

19. Holdsworth LM, Safaeinili N, Winget M, Lorenz1 KA, Lough M, Asch S, et al. Adapting rapid assessment procedures for implementation research using a teambased approach to analysis: a case example of patient quality and safety interventions in the ICU. Implementation Science; 2020 [cited 2020 April 25]; 15: 12.

20. Wardoyo EH, Syahrizal BM, Ferdiana A. Rapid assessment procedures untuk manajemen puskesmas. Madjalah Kedokteran Indonesia. 2011 [cited 2020 April 25]; 61 (2): 68-75.

21. World Medical Association. WMA declaration of Helsinki-ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (2013 Revision); 2018.

22. Tolley EE, Ulin PR, Mack N, Robinson ET, Succop SM. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research second edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand; 2016.

23. Hackett A, Strickland K. Using the framework approach to analyze qualitative data: a worked example. Nurse Researcher. 2019 [cited 2020 April 25]; 26 (2): 8-13.

24. Jessiman PE, Campbell R, Jago R, Sluijs EMFV, and Birch DN. A Qualitative study of health promotion in academy schools in England. BMC Public Health. 2019 [cited 2020 April 25]; 19: 1186.

25. Furber CM. Framework analysis: a method for analysing qualitative data. African Journal of Midwifery an Woman's Health. 2010 [cited 2020 April 25]; 4 (2): 97-100.

26. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Buletin Surveilans PD3I & Imunisasi; 2020. p. 11.

27. Mynors G. Informed choice in medicine taking: drugs of porcine origin and their clinical alternatives: an introductory guide. Medicines Partnership. 2004 [cited 2021 February 4].

28. Smith PJ, Humiston SG, Marcuse EK, Zhao Z, Dorell CG, Howes C, et al. Parental delay or refusal of vaccine doses, childhood vaccination coverage at 24 months of age, and the health belief model. Public Health Rep. 2011 [cited 2020 April 25]; 126: 135-46.

29. Rahmawati AI, Umbul C. Faktor yang mempengaruhi kelengkapan imunisasi dasar di Kelurahan Krembangan Utara (factors affecting completeness basic immunization village district of North Krembangan). Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi. 2014 [cited 2020 April 25]; 2 (1): 59-70.

Download

Share

COinS