Abstract

Kanker serviks menyebabkan 10.3% kematian pada perempuan di Indonesia. Inspeksi visual asam asetat (IVA) telah digunakan untuk program skrining sejak tahun 2014 tetapi hanya 2,45 % perempuan yang melakukan pemeriksaan pada tahun 2015. Di tempat penelitian, cakupan skrining metode IVA kurang dari 1%. Penelitian sebelumnya menyebutkan faktor psikososial sebagai satu faktor penting, tetapi sedikit penelitian yang menganalisis peran dukungan suami dan pengalaman langsung dengan penderita kanker serviks. Penelitian ini bertujuan mempelajari hubungan antara pengalaman langsung dengan penderita kanker serviks, dukungan suami, persepsi diri dan keinginan perempuan melakukan skrining IVA. Penelitian potong lintang dilakukan secara acak pada perempuan berusia 25-55 tahun di empat kelurahan di Yogyakarta. Seluruh data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner. Sebagian besar dari 188 responden memiliki persepsi yang benar mengenai kanker serviks dan pentingnya pemeriksaan IVA, tetapi mereka tidak menerima dukungan yang cukup dari suami. Sebagian kecil memiliki pengalaman langsung dengan penderita kanker serviks. Uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa usia, persepsi yang benar, dan dukungan suami berhubungan dengan keinginan perempuan untuk melakukan skrining IVA (nilai p < 0.05), sedangkan pengalaman langsung dengan penderita kanker serviks tidak berhubungan dengan keinginan melakukan skrining. Perempuan dengan persepsi yang benar dan dukungan suami lebih bersedia melakukan skrining IVA. Cervical cancer causes 10.3% women mortality in Indonesia. Visual Inspection of Acetic Acid (VIA) had been used for screening program since 2014, but only 2.45% women took the test in 2015. In the place of this study, the coverage was at less than 1%. Previous studies revealed that psychosocial was an important factor, but less studies analyzed the role of husband support and direct experience with cervical cancer patient. The aim of the study was to learn correlation between direct experience with cervical cancer patient, husband support, self-perception and women’s desire to take VIA screening. Crosssectional study was applied randomly on women aged 25-55 years old at four villages in Yogyakarta. All data were taken by questionnaire. Most of 188 respondents had right perception of cervical cancer and the importance of VIA, but they did not receive adequate support from their husband. Few of them had direct experience with cervical cancer patient. Statistical results showed that age, right perception and husband support were correlated with women’s desire to take VIA test (p value< 0.05), while direct experience with cervical cancer patient was not correlate. Women with right perception and husband support are more willing to take VIA test.

References

1. World Health Organization. Cancer country profiles. Geneva : World Health Organization Press; 2014 [updated 2014; cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from : http://who.int>country-profiles>idn_en.

2. National Cervical Cancer Coalition. Cervical cancer overview-what is cervical cancer? North Carolina: Research Triangle Park nc 27709; 2011. Available from : http://www.nccc-online.org/hpvcervical-cancer/cervical-cancer-overview/

3. World Health Organization. Prevention and control of cervical cancer. Geneva : World Health Organization Press; 2014. Available from : http://who.int>topics>cancers.

4. Rasjidi I. Epidemiologi kanker pada wanita. Jakarta: Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia; 2010.

5. Bhattacharyya AK, Nath JD, Deka H. Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer. Journal of Mid-Life Health. 2015: 6 (2) :53-8. Available from : http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC4481740/#_ffn_sectitle

6. El Sokkary HH. Comparison between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid in screening of premalignant cervical intraepithelial lesion and subclinical early cancer cervix. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; 6(1): 54-9. Available from: www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/ view/632

7. Sabrida H. Peranan deteksi dini kanker untuk menurunkan penyakit kanker stadium lanjut. Buletin Jendela Data dan Informasi Kesehatan. 2015; Semester 1; 16-24.

8. Dinas Kesehatan Yogyakarta. Profil kesehatan Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Dinas Kesehatan Yogyakarta; 2015.

9. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset kesehatan dasar 2013. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013.

10. Iskandarsyah A. Psychosocial and cultural reasons for delay in seeking help and non-adherence to treatment in Indonesian Women with breast cancer : A Qualitative Study. Pubmed. 2013; 33(3); 214-21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339645

11. Hajializadeh K, Ahadi K, Jomehri F, Rahgozar M. Psychosocial of bariers to cervical cancer screening among Iranian Women: the role of attachment style and social demographic factors. PubMed Central. 2013; 54(4); 218-22. Available from : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718322/

12. Wong LP, Wong YL, Low WY, Khoo EM, Shuib R. Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study. Pubmed. 2008; 15(4); 289-92. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005928

13. Rianto. Kajian hukum secara sosiologis. Jakarta: Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia; 2012.

14. Soneji S, Fukui N. Socioeconomic determinants of cervical cancer screening in Latin America. PubMed Central. 2013; 33(3); 174-82. Available from : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC3724344/

15. Ncube B, Bey A, Knight J, Bessier P, Jolly PE. Factors associated with the uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Portland, Jamaica. Pubmed. 2015; 7(3); 104-17. Available from : https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25839002

16. Yao, J, Suang L, RU Y, Zhou H, Xiang Q, Hu T. Knowledge about cervical cancer and barriers of screening program among women in Wufeng Country, a High-Insidence Region Of Cervical Cancer in China. Public Library of Science. 2012; 7(7); 1-7. Available from : http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067005

17. Kahesa C, Kjaer S, Mwaiselage J, Ngoma T, Tersbol B, Dartel M. Determinants of acceptance of cervical cancer screening in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Pubmed BioMed Central [Open Access Journal]. 2012; 19(12); 1-4. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/23253445

18. Cunningham MS, Skrastins E, Fitzpatrick R, Jindal P, Oneko O, Yeates K, et al. Cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccine acceptability among rural and urban women in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. BioMed Journal Open. 2015; 5(3): 1–10.

19. Aminati. Cara bijak menghadapi dan mencegah kanker leher rahim/ serviks. Yogyakarta: Brilliant Book; 2013.

20. Loppies IJ, Pandu ME. Hubungan pendidikan formal perempuan dengan tingkat kesejahteraan keluarga di Desa Tulehu Kecamatan Salahutu Kabupaten Maluku Tengah [thesis]. :1–16. Available from: http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/

21. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice [Internet]. Wiley: Jossey - Bass. United States of America; 2008. 465-485 p. Available from: http://riskybusiness.web.unc.edu/files/2015/01/Health-Behavior-and-HealthEducation.pdf#page=503

22. Rustgi SD, Doty MM, Collins SR. Women at risk: why many women are forgoing needed health care. An analysis of the Commonwealth Fund 2007 Biennial Health Insurance Survey. Commonweatlh Fund. 2009; 52: 1–12.

23. Mupepi SC, Sampselle CM, Johnson TRB. Knowledge, attitudes, and demographic factors influencing cervical cancer screening behavior of Zimbabwean women. Journal of Women’s Health [Internet]. 2011;20(6):943–52. Available from: http://www.liebertonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1089/jwh.2010.2062

24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Understanding the relationship between education and health: a review evidence and an examination of community perspective-agency for healthcare research and quality. [2015 September 16]; [about 10p]. Available from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculumtools/population health/zimmerman.html

25. Were E, Nyaberi Z, Buziba N. Perceptions of risk and barriers to cervical cancer screening at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya. Pubmed. 2011; 11(1); 58-64. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572858

26. Akbari F, Shakibazadeh E, Pourreza A, Tavafian SS. Barier and facilitating factor for cervical cancer screening : a qualitative study from Iran. Iran Journal Cancer. 2010;3(4);178-84. Available from http://journals. sbmu.ac.ir/cp/article/viewFile/2448/2233

27. Dariyo A. Psikologi perkembangan dewasa muda. Jakarta: Grasindo; 2010.

28. Hajarrahma A, Supriyono Y, Herani I. Pengungkapan diri pada penderita kanker serviks [Internet]. Brawijaya University. March 2014 [ 2016 November 3]; 1(1); [ 15.]. Available from http://psikologi.ub.ac.id/old/ wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/10/JURNAL-PENGUNGKAPANDIRI-PADA-PENDERITA-KANKER-SERVIKS1.pdf

29. Documet P, Bear TM, Flatt JD, Macia L, Trauth J, Ricci EM. The association of social support and socioeconomic status with breast and cervical cancer screening. Health Education and Behavior [Internet]. 2015;42(1):55–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/25394824%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4526257%5Cnhttp://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/1090198114557124%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih .gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4526257&tool=pmcentrez&rend

30. Linadi KE. Dukungan suami mendorong keikutsertaan pap smear pasa - ngan usia subur (PUS) di perumahan pucang gading semarang. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2013; 4(2): 61–71.

31. Wahyuni S. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku deteksi dini kanker serviks di kecamatan ngampel Kabupaten Kendal Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Keperawatan Maternal [Internet]. 2013; 1(1): 55–60. Available from: http://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/JKMat/article/view/ 933/985

32. Nursih I, Rahmawati R, Yulianti R. Study of men concern on women’s reproductive health in Ranjeng Village. Jurnal LPPM: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta. 2012; 1(1); 3. Available from: http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jlppm/article/view/179

33. Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia. Gender dalam kesehatan reproduksi. Yogyakarta: Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia; 2016 [updated 2016 July; cited 2017 March 27]. Available from: http://www.pkbi-diy.info/?p=4624 2016

34. Hidayan IM. Men’s role on family’s reproductive health [Research Report]. Depok: Universitas Indonesia; 2012. Available from : Indonesialib.ui.ac.id/file?file=pdf/abstrak-76260.pdf

Download

Share

COinS