Abstract

Sekitar 10-30% orang Asia dewasa mengalami sindrom metabolik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap efek Promosi Kesehatan di Tempat Kerja PKDTK dengan intervensi multilevel pada komponen/penanda pekerja yang menderita sindrom metabolik. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada tahun 2014-2015 dengan menggunakan desain quasi experimental dengan intervensi subjek secara multilevel di Indonesia. Program PKDTK untuk kelompok intervensi multilevel berupa kombinasi latihan fisik, diet, pendidikan kesehatan, dukungan sosial, dan advokasi salama 12 minggu. Program PKDTK untuk kelompok kontrol hanya pendidikan kesehatan. Instrumen penelitian seperti IPAQ, table food recall 24 jam, alat pengukuran fisik, dan laboratorium klinis. Analisis data menggunakan Marginal Homogeneity, paired sample t, Mc Nemar, dan uji Wilcoxon. Intervensi PKDTK multilevel dapat meningkatkan aktivitas fisik dan asupan makanan yang sesuai dengan diet sindrom metabolik, khususnya untuk meningkatkan jumlah serat pangan dan pengurangan asupan kolesterol. Komponen sindrom metabolik yang membaik karena pengaruh PKDTK secara multilevel adalah tekanan darah sistolik dan diastolik, serta kadar glukosa darah puasa (nilai p < 0,05). Secara keseluruhan, intervensi PKDTK multilevel efektif untuk pengelolaan komponen sindroma metabolik pada pekerja. Approximately 10–30% of adult Asian people had metabolic syndrome. This study aimed to reveal effects of workplace health promotion (WHP) with multilevel interventions on workers’ metabolic syndrome component. This study was conducted in 2014-2015 using quasi-experimental design with multilevel subject intervention in Indonesia. The WHP program for multilevel intervention group included 12 weeks of combined physical training, diet, health education, social support, and advocacy. The WHP program for control group included only health education. Instruments used included IPAQ, table of 24-hour food recall, physical measurement tools, and clinical laboratories. Data analysis used Marginal Homogeneity, paired sample t-test, Mc Nemar, and Wilcoxon test. WHP multilevel intervention could improve physical activity and the nutrition in accordance with diet of workers, in particular to increase the amount of fiber and a reduce cholesterol intake. The improved metabolic syndrome components due to the influence of multilevel WHP were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and fasting blood glucose levels (p value < 0.05). Overall, workplace health promotion multilevel interventions are effective for the management of metabolic syndrome components.

References

1. Nestel P, Lyu R, Low LP, Sheu WHH, Nitiyanant W, Saito I, et al. Metabolic syndrome: recent prevalence in East and Southeast Asian populations. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007; 16 (2): 362–7.

2. Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, Leblanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. Workers. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 (11): 2390-5.

3. Alegría E, Cordero A, Laclaustra M, Grima A, León M, Casasnovas JA. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Spanish working population: MESYAS Registry. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2005; 58 (7): 797- 806.

4. Semiardji G. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome: findings from the epidemiological study on obesity and its comorbidities in Indonesian populations. In: Tjokroprawiro A, Soegih R, Soegondo S, Wijaya A, Sutardjo B, Tridjaja B, et al, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd National Obesity Symposium. Hotel Shangri La Jakarta, 15-16 Mei 2004: Indonesian Society for the Study on Obesity, 2004.

5. Zahtamal, Rochmah W, Prabandari YS, Setyawati LK. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among company workers. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal. 2014; 9 (2): 113-20.

6. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. A joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640-5.

7. Quintiliani L, Sattelmair J, Sorensen G. The workplace as a setting for interventions to improve diet and promote physical activity, background paper prepared for the WHO/WEF joint event on preventing noncommunicable diseases in the workplace. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

8. Wadden TA, Butryn ML. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America. 2003; 32: 981–1003.

9. Wing RR. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, eds. Handbook of Obesity: Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2004. p. 147–62.

10. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Byrne KJ. Efficacy of lifestyle modification for long-term weight control. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice. 2004;12 Suppl: 151S–62S.

11. Erhardt J. NutriSurvey for windows Copyright ©. Jakarta: SeameoTropmed RCCN-University of Indonesia; 2007.

12. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 346: 393– 403.

13. Anwar B. 2004. Manfaat diet pada penanggulangan hiperkolesterolemi. Digitized by USU digital library; 2004 [cited 2011 December 11]. Available from: http://library.usu.ac.id /download/fk/gizi-bahri6.pdf

14. Anderssen SA, Carroll S, Urdal P, Holme I. Combined diet and exercise intervention reverses the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged males: results from the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2007; 17: 687–95.

15. Handajani A, Roosihermiatie B, Maryani H. Factors associated with mortality pattern of degenerative diseases in Indonesia. Bulletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2010, 13 (1): 42-53.

16. Allison KR, Dwyer JJM, MacGillivray A, Hawrychuk S; Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion. A review of workplace and community interventions for adults: effects of physical activity, eating behaviours and BMI – risk factors for diabetes. Toronto: ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario; 2011.

17. WHO. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2004 [cited 28 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdf

18. Nathan DM, Delahanty LM. Conquering diabetes. Jakarta: PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer. Indonesia; 2009.

19. American College of Sports Medicine. CSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 6th ed. Mc Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

20. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002; 22 (4S): 73-108.

21. Engbers LH, van Poppel MNM, Chin A Paw MJM, van Mechelen W. Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005; 29 (1): 61-70.

22. Parikka PI, Eriksson JG, Lindstrom J, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Hamalainen H, et al. Effect of lifestyle intervention on the occurrence of metabolic syndrome and its components in the finnish diabetes prevention tudy. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(4): 805-7.

23. Seo DI, So WY, Ha S, Yoo EJ, Kim D, Singh H et al. Effects of 12 weeks of combined exercise training on visfatin and metabolic syndrome factors in obese middle-aged women. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2011;10: 222-6.

24. Ha CH, So WY. Effects of combined exercise training on body composition and metabolic syndrome factors. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2012: 41 (8); 20-6.

25. Pronk N. The metabolic syndrome—the ‘‘syndrome x factor’’—at work. Acsm’s health & fitness journal. 2006; 10 (5): 38-42.

Download

Share

COinS