Abstract

Pencapaian Program KB di Sumatera Utara kurang menggembirakan. Total Fertility Rate Sumatera Utara (3,0) lebih tinggi dibandingkan nasional (2,6); dan prevalensi kontrasepsi (55,9 %) lebih rendah dibandingkan nasional (61,9%). Sebagai salah satu strategi peningkatan kesertaan KB, pelayanan momentum sterilisasi pria dikhawatirkan tidak memenuhi standar pelayanan karena dikaitkan dengan rekor MURI. Evaluasi ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan kualitas pelaksanaan pelayanan dan kepuasan akseptor sterilisasi pria. Evaluasi bersifat kualitatif dan kuantitatif dilakukan secara potong lintang terhadap petugas KB, calon akseptor dan akseptor yang mendapat tindakan sterilisasi pada pelayanan momentum di 13 fasilitas kesehatan di Kota Medan, Sumatera Utara pada 23-24 Oktober 2012. Data kualitatif diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap pengelola KB kecamatan dan desa. Data kuantitatif dikumpulkan provider di tempat pelayanan dengan menggunakan angket mengenai calon akseptor, dan kuesioner berstruktur terhadap sub sampel akseptor sterilisasi pria. Hasil menunjukkan relatif lancar persiapan, penggerakan, KIE, pelayanan sterilisasi pria dan pencatatan pelaporannya. Pelaksanaan pelayanan sterilisasi pria berhasil melayanai 1379 dari target 2001 target calon akseptor, sehingga mendapatkan REKOR MURI. Hampir semua peserta sterilisasi pria merasa puas terhadap pelayanan dari petugas medis dan petugas KB. Family Planning (FP) program achievement in North Sumatera Province is less encouraging. Total fertility rate in North Sumatera (3.0) is higher than the national (2.6) and contraceptive prevalence (55.9%) is lower than the national (61.4%). As one strategy to increase FP participation, momentum sterilization service was feared not to meet the medical care standard because related to Indonesian Record Museum. This evaluation aimed to explain service quality and satisfaction among male sterilization acceptors. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluation were done cross sectionally against FP officers, prospectives and acceptors who received medical procedure during momentum service performed in 13 health facilities in Medan City, North Sumatera on October 23 to 24, 2012. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interview towards subdistrict and village FP managers. Quantitative data regarding prospective acceptors and a structured questionnaire to subsample of male sterilization acceptors were collected by the provider at the service location. Results showed the relatively smooth preparation, mobilization, Information, Education and Communication, male sterilization services and its reporting records. Implementation of male sterilization service had served 1379 of 2001 prospective acceptors targetted, so the national record was achieved. Almost all respondents were satisfied with the services provided both by FP and medical officers.

References

1. Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc. Survei demografi dan kesehatan Indonesia 2002-2003. Columbia (USA): Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc; 2003.

2. Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc. Survei demografi dan kesehatan Indonesia 2007. Columbia (USA): Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc; 2008.

3. Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc. Survei demografi dan kesehatan Indonesia 2012. Columbia (USA): Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan, dan Macro International Inc; 2013.

4. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r & d. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2012.

5. Rohimi LY. Nilai – nilai budaya dalam memandang metode kontrasepsi medis operasi pria di Kabupaten Demak tahun 2013 [skripsi]. Semarang: Fakultas Kesehatan Universitas Dian Nuswantoro. 2014; p.12.

6. Engender Health. Delivering quality sterilization services in the postCairo era. In: Engender Health. Contraceptive sterilization: Global issues and trends. Engender Health. 2002; p. 1-16.

7. Mahat K, Pacheun O, Taechaboonsermsak P. Intention to accept vasectomy among married men in Kathmandu, Nepal. Asia Journal of Public Health. Asia Journal Public Health [1 (1): 8-14]. June 2010 [cited 2016 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.ASIAPH.org/

8. Wijaya M. Pengembangan model KIE dalam meningkatkan keikutsertaan suami menggunakan alat kontrasepsi di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Ikatan Bidan Indonesia Jawa Barat, 2011; Vol 2 (1): 37-43.

9. Ambarwati NW. Male and societal responses to vasectomy in Java, Indonesia. Global Science and Technology Forum Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC). 2015; 2 (1): 56-60.

10. Novianti S, Gustaman RA. Faktor persepsi dan dukungan isteri yang berhubungan dengan partisipasi KB pria. Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas Indonesia. 2014; 10 (2): 1017.

11. Dayanand G, Singh S, Baruwal C. An assessment of knowledge and attitude of vasectomy in adult males: a cross-sectional study from Pokhara, Western Nepal. Medical Science. 2014; 2 (4): 164 – 70.

12. Keramat A, Afsanah Z, Masoumah A. Barriers and facilitators affecting vasectomy acceptability (a multi stages study in a sample from north eastern of Iran), 2005-2007. Asia Pacific Family Medica. 2011; 10 (1): 5.

13. Bunce A, Guest G, Searing H, Frajzyngier V, Riwa P, Kanama J, et al. Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2007; 33 (1): 13-21.

14. Akpamu U, Nwoke EO, Osifo UC, Igbinovia ENS, Adisa AW. Knowledge and acceptance of ‘vasectomy as a method of contraception’ amongst literate married men in Ekpoma, Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research. Res, 2010; 13 (2): 153 – 6.

15. Onasoga OA, Edoni EER, Ekanem J. Knowledge and attitude of men towards vasectomy as a family planning method in Edo State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Nursing and Midwifery. 2013; 2 (1): 13–21.

16. Ebeigbe PN, Igberase GO, Eigbefoh J. Vasectomy: a survey of attitudes, counseling patterns and acceptance among Nigerian resident gynaecologists. Ghana Medical Journal. 2011; 45 (3): 101-4.

17. Anwar Sumaida, Majid Shahzad. Vasectomy in Pakistan: changing culture of sharring responsibility toward better family health. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2014; 3 (6): 70 - 6.

18. Affandi B, Adriaansz G, Gunardi ER, Koesno H. Buku panduan praktis pelayanan kontrasepsi. Jakarta: BT Yayasan Bina Pustaka-Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2011.

19. American Society For Reproductive Medicine. Age fertility. American Society For Reproductive Medicine; 2012. Available from: https://www.asrm.org/uploadedFiles/ASRM_/Patient_Resources/Fact_ Sheets_and_Info_Booklets/agefertility.pdf

20. Bruce J. Fundamental element of the quality of care: a simple framework. New York: The Population Council; 1990.

21. Wilopo SA. Keluarga berencana: pilihan dan tantangan untuk negara sedang berkembang dan Indonesia. Contraceptive Technology Update. 2014; 1: 1-12.

22. Manurung S. Model pengambilan keputusan meningkatkan akseptor keluarga berencana metode kontrasepsi jangka panjang. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2013; 7 (11): 483-8.

23. Hendra R. Pemantapan partisipasi pria dalam program keluarga berencana: Jurnal PARALLELA. 2014; 1 (1): 1-88.

24. Gingell C, Crosby D, Carroll R. Review of the complications and medicolegal implications of vasectomy. Postgraduate Medical Journal: Personal View. 2001; 77: 656 – 59. DOI: 10.1136/pmj.77.912.656

Download

Share

COinS