Abstract
Globalization, which has contributed to the proliferation of international buying and selling activities, necessitates legal unification to overcome differences in the rules for buying and selling contracts enshrined in national law. Using normative legal research methods and focusing on aspects of the parties' obligations in international sales and purchase contracts, this paper compares the rules contained in Indonesia's Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). The case of a sales-purchase contract dispute between a British company group and a Danish trading company was also investigated in order to gain a better understanding of the more specific regulatory aspects of product sales-purchase contracts involving conformity of goods. The main distinction between the CISG and the Civil Code is the approach taken when non-conformance of goods is discovered. The comparison of the rules and analysis shows that there are insufficient reasons for Indonesia to adopt the CISG. The provisions of the Civil Code address aspects that ensure the suitability of the goods in the sale and purchase agreement, as well as providing adequate guarantees for the parties' rights and obligations. The Civil Code also provides benefits that the CISG does not, such as those related to sale and purchase deeds, interest, and other additional fees. The Civil Code more fully regulates the seller's statement regarding his contractual obligations. Aside from that, there are recommendations for the development of Indonesian law to formulate provisions regarding criteria for non-conforming goods, as well as alternative efforts for the parties regarding the non-conformity of the goods discovered.
Bahasa Abstract
Globalisasi yang turut mendorong maraknya aktivitas jual-beli di tingkat internasional, menuntut dilakukannya unifikasi hukum guna mengatasi perbedaan aturan kontrak jual-beli yang terdapat pada masing-masing hukum nasional. Berfokus pada aspek kewajiban para pihak dalam kontrak jual beli internasional, tulisan ini melakukan komparasi aturan yang terdapat pada KUHPerdata Indonesia dan CISG. Kasus sengketa kontrak jual beli antara grup perusahaan Inggris dan kongsi dagang Denmark turut dikaji guna mendapatkan pemahaman khusus mengenai aspek pengaturan yang lebih spesifik dalam kontrak jual beli produk yang berhubungan dengan kesesuaian barang (conformity of goods). Beberapa hal penting telah dicatat bersama kesimpulan yang mendukung argumen pokok, bahwa belum cukup alasan bagi Indonesia untuk menerima CISG. Bahwa, ketentuan dalam KUHPerdata sudah memberikan jaminan yang baik terhadap hak dan kewajiban para pihak dalam sebuah perikatan jual-beli. Sekiranya dibutuhkan, beberapa ketentuan CISG yang belum diatur dalam KUHPerdata dapat diadopsi untuk memperkaya khasanah dan demi pembangunan hukum nasional yang lebih baik.
References
Buku
Harahap, M. and Yahya, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian [Aspects of Contract Law].Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 1986.
Huber, Peter and Alastair Mullis, The CISG - A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners. Munich: Sellier-European Law Publishers, 2007.
Juwana, Hikmahanto, Naskah Akademik tentang Ratifikasi Konvensi PBB mengenai Kontrak Jual Beli Barang Internasional [Academic Paper on Ratification of the UN Convention on International Sales and Purchase Contracts]. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2013.
Katarina, Ayu, Analisis terhadap Rencana Peratifikasian United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) ke dalam Hukum Indonesia[Analysis of the Plan to Ratify the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) into Indonesian Law]. Bandung: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum UNPAR, 2014.
Sutanto, Marko Cahya, Prospek Penggunaan United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)[Prospects for Using the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)]. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 2021.
Jurnal
Fogt, Morten M. "The Knowledge Test Under the CISG - A Global Threefold Distinction of Negligence, Gross Negligence and De Facto Knowledge." Journal of Law & Commerce 34, no.1.(2015): 23-111.
Lutz, Henning. "The CISG and Common Law Courts: Is There Really a Problem?" Victoria University of Wellington Law Review (2004).
Rahmadi, Ida Bagus. "Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Dagang Internasional [Development of International Trade Contract Law]." Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (2012).
Putusan Pengadilan
Kingspan Environmental Ltd v Borealis A/S (2012) EWHC 1147 (Comm). Royal Court of Justice, London, WC2A 2LL.
Julie George v. Kristian Skovridder (2010) BS 150-1320/2010. Retten i Horsens District Court. Denmark.
Peraturan Perundangundangan dan Konvensi
Indonesia. Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek Voor Indonesie/BW, Staatsblad 1847 No. 23).
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980). U.N. Doc. A/CONF.97/18.
Sumber Lainnya
Henry Campbell Black, “Trade” dalam Black’s Law Dictionary, Revisi Edisi Keempat, West Publishing Co, Minnesota (1968): 1665
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Digital Versi 0.4.0 Beta, Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan (2016-2020).
Recommended Citation
Sulistyo, A.D. Agung and Hefni, Hanna Adistyana
(2024)
"Suitability of Goods: Obligations of the Parties in International Sales and Purchases Case Study of the Borecene Sales and Purchase Contract between Kingspan (England) and Borealis (Denmark),"
Journal of Private International Law Studies: Vol. 1:
No.
1, Article 5.
DOI: 10.21143/JPILS.v1i1.1009
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jpils/vol1/iss1/5