Abstract
With the increasing incidence of chronic kidney disease in Indonesia, an effective, sustainable and widely available kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is needed. PD is one of the available modalities that can meet those criteria. To date, out of the two existing types of PD, only continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is available in our country. Studies showed that residual kidney function is preserved better in CAPD patients compared to HD patients. With the use of CAPD as KRT, patients can do dialysis independently. Hence, it can be solution to the limitations and the difficulty of reaching HD units especially in remote areas. However, due to lack of knowledge or experience of clinicians regarding CAPD, the use of CAPD is scarce in Indonesia. Clinicians can increase their role in kidney services by increasing CAPD utilization. The key to improve CAPD utilization is a good understanding and optimal education about CAPD to patients and their families. This review aims to introduce and remind clinicians of the availability of CAPD besides HD and kidney transplant as one of the available modalities of KRT for patients with ESKD in Indonesia.
References
7. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709-33. 8. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):260-72. 9. Wu H, Li Q, Cai Y, Zhang J, Cui W, Zhou Z. Economic burden and cost-utility analysis of three renal replacement therapies in ESRD patients from Yunnan Province, China. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(3):573-79. 10. Perhimpunan Nefrologi Indonesia. 11th Report of Indonesian renal registry. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Nefrologi Indonesia (PERNEFRI); 2018. 11. Perhimpunan Nefrologi Indonesia. 10th Report of Indonesian renal registry. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Nefrologi Indonesia (PERNEFRI); 2017. 12. Mushi L, Marschall P, Flessa S. The cost of dialysis in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:506. 13. Marron B, Remon C, Perez-Fontan M, Quirós P, Ortíz A. Benefits of preserving residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008(108):S42-51. 14. Niang A, Iyengar A, Luyckx VA. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in resource-limited settings. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018;27(6):463-71. 15. Khoe LC, Kristin E, Masytoh LS, Herlinawaty E, Werayingyong P, Nadjib M, et al. Economic evaluation of policy options for dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients under the universal health coverage in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177436. 16. Ronco C, Rodigherio MP, Dell’Aquila R, editors. Peritoneal dialysis: a clinical update. Basel, Switzerland: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2006. p.150 17. Daudrigas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS. Handbook of Dialysis, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. 18. Perl J, Bargman JM. Peritoneal dialysis: from bench to bedside and bedside to bench. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311(5):F999- 1004. 19. Moreno A, Sarav M. Physiology of peritoneal dialysis. In: Haggerty S, editor. Surgical aspects of peritoneal dialysis. Gewerbestr, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p.7-15. 20. Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet RT, Nolph KD. Textbook of peritoneal dialysis, 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands; 2000. 21. Teitelbaum I, Burkart J. Peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):1082-96. 22. Hansson JH, Watnick S. Update on peritoneal dialysis: core curriculum 2016. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(1):151-64. 23. Andreoli MCC, Totoli C. Peritoneal dialysis. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(Suppl 1):s37-44. 24. Dalal P, Sangha H, Chaudhary K. In peritoneal dialysis, is there sufficient evidence to make “PD first” therapy? Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:239515. 25. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Vonesh E. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int. 2009;76(1):97-107. 26. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MGM, Charro FTd. Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in the Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(9):1655-60. 27. Ahn W, Radhakrishman J. Pocket emergency nephrology. Philadelpia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2020 28. Li PK, Chow KM. Peritoneal dialysis patient selection: characteristics for success. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009;16(3):160-8. 29. Li PK, Chow K, Szeto C. Is there a survival advantage in Asian peritoneal. Int J Artif Organs. 2003;26(5): 363-72. 30. Lee Y, Chung SW, Park S, Ryu H, Lee H, Kim DK, et al. Incremental peritoneal dialysis may be beneficial for preserving residual renal function compared to full-dose peritoneal dialysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10105. 31. Blake PG, Dong J, Davies SJ. Incremental peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(3):320-26. 32. Reddy YNV, Mendu ML. The role of incremental peritoneal dialysis in the era of the advancing American kidney health initiative. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;2020:1-3. 33. Couchoud Cc, Savoye E, Frimat L, Ryckelynck JP, Chalem Y, Verger C. Variability in case mix and peritoneal dialysis selection in fifty-nine french districts. Peritoneal Dialysis International 2008;28:509-17. 34. Blake PG, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ. Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33(3):233-41.
Recommended Citation
Lydia, Aida
(2020)
"The Role of Continous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Equity of Kidney Replacement Therapy in Indonesia,"
Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia: Vol. 7:
Iss.
3, Article 9.
DOI: 10.7454/jpdi.v7i3.469
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jpdi/vol7/iss3/9
