•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Introduction. Level of agreement comparison between biopsy per colonoscopy examination is used to measure of the quality of a colonoscopy examination and needed to be identified. This study aims to identify level of agreement comparison between histopathologic examination of biopsy per colonoscopy and histopathologic examination per surgical. Methods. A cross sectional study was conducted by using medical records from patients with colon tumor who had undergone histopathologic examination with biopsy per colonoscopy and then confirmed by surgical procedure in PESC RSPUN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo between 1st January, 2006 31st December, 2015. Level of agreement calculated using comparative agreement category test in order to obtain the value of kappa. Results. A total of 48 subjects were included in this study. Analysis result showed that level of real agreement, level of agreement by chance, and level of agreement not by chance was 79%, 77%, and 23%, respectively. The kappa value was 0,134. Conclusion. The level of agreement comparison between histopathologic examination of biopsy per colonoscopy compared with histopathologic examination per surgical at PESC RSCM between 2006-2015 period was not good.

References

1. Salvo S, Craig L. Mosby’s pathology for massage therapists. 3th ed. Missouri: Elvisier Mosby; 2014. p.335 2. Lan T, Price A, Tellez M. Biopsy pathology in colorectal disease. 2nd ed. Great Britain : Hodder Headline Group; 2007. p.248-50 3. Lipof T, Bartus C, Sardella W, Johnson K, Vignati P, Cohen J. Preoperative colonoscopy decreases the need for laparoscopic management of colonic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(5):1076-80. 4. Conio M, Siersema P, Repici A, Ponchon T. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Australia: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. p.131-50 5. Shaukat A, Allen I, Jhon L. Colorectal screening quality and benchmarks. New York: Springer; 2015. p.26-8 6. Fruhmorgan P, Classen M. Endoscopy and biopsy in gastroenterology technique and indications [Internet]. New York: Springer; 1980 [cited 2016 Aug 29]. Available from: http://pubmedcentralcanada. ca/pmcc/articles/PMC2219849/. p.43-8 7. Montgomery E, Voltaggio L. Biopsy interpretation of the gastrointestinal tract mukosa: volume 2 neoplastic. 2nd ed. NewYork: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p.207-19 8. Westra W, Hruban RH, Phelps TH, Isacson C. Surgical pathology dissection, an illustrated guide. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2002. p.66-9 9. Alder D. Core concept in colonoscopy. United State: Slack; 2014. p.159-65 10. Papamichael D. Management of colorectal cancers in older people. New York: Springer; 2013. p.3 11. Albert D, Block A, Bruce B, et all. Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary.32ed. Philadelphia: Saunder Elvisier; 2012. p.218-88 12. Petrelli N, Letourneau R, Weber T, Nava ME, Rodriguez-Bigas M.. Accuracy of biopsy and cytology for preoperative diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71(1):46-9. 13. Fenoglio F, Cecilia M. Gastrointestinal pathology: an atlas and text, 3rd. ed. Wolter Kluwer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p.1481-6 14. Brullet E, Montané JM, Bombardó J, Bonfill X, Noguè M, Bordas JM. Intraoperative colonoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1992;79(12):1376-8. 15. Corley DA, Levin TR, Doubeni CA. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):1298- 306. 16. NAACCR Administers NPCR-Education Contract for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National program of cancer registries education and training series how to collect high quality cancer surveillance data [internet]. Atlanta, Georgia: NAACCR; 2001 [cited 2016 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ cancer/npcr/pdf/abstracting/colon.pdf. 17. Buturovic S. Colonoscopy as a method of choice in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(3):164-6. 18. Anthony VJ, Joanne M, Gamelt. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005:37(5):360-3 19. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advance neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1863- 72. 20. Lieberman D, Weiss D, Bond J, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adult for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(3):162-8. 21. Sanderson R, Boyle S, Willliams C, Walker-Smith JA. Histological abnormalities in biopsies from macroscopically normal colonoscopies. Arch Dis Child.1986;61(3):274-7. 22. Singh A,Yong K, S Taylor, Raju GS, Goodwin JS. Predictors of colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in the medicare population. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(11):3122-8. 23. Fletcher RH, Nadel MR, Allen JI, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Johnson DA, et al. The quality of colonoscopy service-responsibilities of referring clinicians a concensus statement of quality assurance task group, national colorectal cancer roundtable. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1230-4. 24. Liu S, Ho SB, Krinsky ML. Quality of polyp resection during colonoscopy: are we archieving polyp clearance? Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(7):1786-91. 25. Cappell M, Abboud R. The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in united state: significantly shorter procedur time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(12):3521-9.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.