Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings
Abstract
An aged thermal oxidizer (TOX) in the oil and gas industry necessitates a comprehensive evaluation to ensure its continued safe operation. This study presents a Remaining Life Assessment (RLA) and a Fitness for Service (FFS) evaluation for the four main components of the TOX, in accordance with API 510, API 579/ASME FFS-1, and ASME BPVC Section VIII Div-1 standards. The investigation includes the determination of maximum stress and maximum temperature required to assess the operational viability of the reactor. The four components are radiant, convection, transition, and stack sections—were modeled using the finite element method (FEM). Following the geometric modeling, an FFS evaluation was conducted based on two criteria: stress and temperature, to ascertain whether the TOX remains safe and operational until the end of its service life. Based on the FFS assessment, the TOX structure has been deemed fit to operate and acceptable for use throughout its remaining service life. Subsequently, a remaining life assessment performed on these components indicated an estimated service life of 20 years. According to the analyses carried out, the maximum stress observed is 160 MPa in the radiant section, while the highest temperature, recorded at 392 °C, occurs in the convection and transition sections. These results indicate that the radiant area particularly the upper radiant component, poses the highest risk due to the stress concentrations at its peak levels. In conclusion, although the TOX system is currently operating safely, periodic inspections are essential to ensure its continued secure operation until the end of its remaining service life.
References
API 2016, API 570: Piping inspection code – in-service inspection, rating, repair, and alteration of piping systems, American Petroleum Institute, Washington.
API 2021, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1: Fitness-for-service, American Petroleum Institute, Washington.
ASCE 2017, ASCE 7-22: Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston.
ASTM 2019, ASTM A36/A36M-19: Standard specification for carbon structural steel, ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
Bakhtiari, S 2017, Fitness-for-service assessment of a fire-damaged pressure vessel in a refinery unit, Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, pp. 606–616, Elsevier.
Bohra, H & Guzey, S 2020, Fitness-for-service of open-top storage tanks subjected to differential settlement, Engineering Structures, 225, 111277, Elsevier.
Center for Chemical Process Safety 2017, Guidelines for asset integrity management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia 2025, Outlook energi Indonesia 2025, Kementerian ESDM, Jakarta.
Martello, G 2016, ‘Discretization Analysis in FEM Models’, EDP Sciences, p. 53.
Nugroho, B S & Pratama, M A 2024, ‘Assessment of thermal oxidizer performance efficiency’, Catalyx: Journal of Process Chemistry and Technology, 1(2), pp. 83–96.
Satyam, S, Khan, A & Khare, G 2023, ‘A comprehensive review on current trends, applications and future directions of finite element methods’, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(8), pp. e410–e414.
Zangeneh, S 2021, ‘Fitness-for-service assessment and failure analysis of hydrogen-induced cracking in a pipeline steel’, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, pp. 1875–1887.
Zienkiewicz, O C, Taylor, R L & Zhu, J Z 2013, The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals, 7th edn, Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam.
Recommended Citation
Yudistirawan, Yudhi; Dhaneswara, Donanta; Putra, Wahyuaji Narottama; Widyaputra, Gama; Suci, Dewi Kurnia; and Mahardhika, Agung Putra
(2026)
"Feasibility Analysis of Thermal Oxidizer to Determine Remaining Life Using Fitness- for-Service Level 3 Method,"
Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings: Vol. 5:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
DOI: 10.7454/jmef.v5i1.1115
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jmef/vol5/iss1/4
Included in
Chemical Engineering Commons, Chemicals and Drugs Commons, Computational Engineering Commons, Condensed Matter Physics Commons, Fluid Dynamics Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Mechanical Engineering Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Natural Products Chemistry and Pharmacognosy Commons, Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering Commons, Other Engineering Commons, Polymer Chemistry Commons, Risk Analysis Commons, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics Commons







