JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA
Abstract
The Indonesian government has employed communication strategies such as leveraging new media and big data to provide its citizens with information during the Covid-19 global pandemic. Previous research has shown that these are some tools that were used by digital PR practitioners during a crisis. However, it is said that research on usage of new media has been focused on the organizational perspective. This article conducted an exploratory study on how and why users select certain forms of new media to search for information. An in-depth interview with three informants was done to gain a societal perspective. Uses and gratifications theory, including its development due to the advancement Of technology in Industry 4.0, served as a framework to analyze the data gathered from the interview. The results showed that all three informants tend to use alternative new media because of the gratification it provides, instead of Gugus Tugas’s official website. This article contributes to the literature on new media user behavior in selecting information sources in times of crisis. It also provides practical and theoretical insights for future studies.
Pemerintah Indonesia telah menggunakan strategi komunikasi seperti pemanfaatan media baru dan data besar untuk memberikan informasi kepada warga selama menghadapi pandemi global Covid-19. Penelitian sebelumnya telah menunjukkan bahwa ini adalah beberapa alat yang digunakan oleh praktisi PR digital selama krisis. Namun demikian, penelitian tentang penggunaan media baru lebih banyak difokuskan pada perspektif organisasi. Artikel ini melakukan studi eksplorasi tentang bagaimana dan mengapa pengguna memilih bentuk media baru tertentu untuk mencari informasi. Wawancara mendalam dengan tiga informan dilakukan untuk mendapatkan perspektif dari sisi masyarakat. Teori Uses and Gratifications, termasuk perkembangannya akibat kemajuan teknologi Industri 4.0, berfungsi sebagai kerangka kerja untuk menganalisis data yang telah dikumpulkan dalam wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga informan cenderung menggunakan media baru alternatif karena lebih memuaskan daripada situs resmi Gugus Tugas. Artikel ini berkontribusi pada literatur tentang perilaku pengguna media baru dalam memilih sumber informasi di saat krisis. Artikel ini juga memberikan masukan praktikal dan teoritis untuk penelitian di masa depan.
References
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review. EnglishLinguistics Research, 3(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39Bajaj, G., Pillai, A., & Gupta, R. (2015). Crisis Communication in the Digital
Era. Managing in Recovering Markets, August 2015, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1979-8Bakhasi, N. (2018). Chatbots Point of View. Deloitte. Digital, March, 1–26.Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012). Does Web 3.0 come after
Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New Media and Society, 14(8), 1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812445878Bates, D. (2006). “Mini-Me” History Public Relations from the Dawn of Civilization.
nstitutefor Public Relations, October.Binsar, A., & Salamah, U. (2018). Anticipating the Post Human Era in Public Relations. 2ndIndonesia International Graduate Conference on Communication (Indo-IGCC) Proceeding, 373–392.Carley, K.
M., Malik, M., Kowalchuck, M., Pfeffer, J., & Landwehr, P. (2015). Twitter Usage in Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2720332Coombs, W. Timothy, & Holladay, S. J. (2009). Further explorations of post-crisis
communication: Effects of media and response strategies on perceptions and intentions. PublicRelations Review, 35(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.011Coombs, W.T. (2010). Crisis Communication: A Developing Field. In R.
L. Heath (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Public Relations (2nd ed.,pp. 477-488). Sage.Garnett, J. L. (2005). Administrative Communication (or How to Make All 88 the Rest Work): The Concept of Professional Centrality. In R. J. Stillman II
(Ed.), Public Administration: Concepts and Cases (8th ed., pp 260-76). Houghton MifflinGironda, J. T., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2014). Understanding consumers’ social networking site usage. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(5–6),
571–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.851106González-Herrero, A., & Smith, S. (2008). Crisis Communications Management on the Web: How Internet-Based Technologies are Changing the Way Public Relations Professionals
Handle Business Crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(3), 143-153Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A. & Sparks, G. (2019). A first look of communication theory. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Grunig, E, J., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing
public relations. In Entertainment Management: Towards Best Practice. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640228.0060 Harrison, T. M., & Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding new media in Web 2.0: Exploring the history of
engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media and Society, 11(1–2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808099580Hasnawati, S. & Salamah, U. (2017). The evaluation of the transformation of
governmentpublic relations in the new media era. October, 10–11. https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/the-evaluation-of-the-transformation-of-government-public-relationHennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S.,
Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., & Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375460Huang, Y. H. C., Wu, F., & Huang, Q. (2017).
Does research on digital public relations indicatea paradigm shift? An analysis and critique of recent trends. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.012Lariscy, R. W., Tinkham, S. F., & Sweetser,
K. D. (2011). Kids these days: Examining differences in political uses and gratifications, internet political participation, political information efficacy, and cynicism on the basis of age. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 749–764.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211398091Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of Human Communication (11 ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.McDonald, L. M & Hebbani, A. G. (2011). Back to the future: Is
strategic the management (re) emerging as public relations ’ dominant paradigm? PRism 8(1), 1–16.McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). Public Services Government 4.0 - the public sector in the digital age. McKinsey &Company,
1–15.Meranti, & Irwansyah. (2018). Kajian Humas Digital: Transformasi dan Kontribusi Industri 4.0 pada Stratejik Kehumasan. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi,7(1),27–36.Mizanie, D., & Irwansyah. (2019). Pemanfaatan Media
Sosial sebagai Strategi Kehumasan Digital di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.21107/komunikasiMoon, M. J. (2002). “Can IT Help Government to Restore Public Trust?: Declining Public Trust
and Potential Prospects of IT in the Public Sector.” Presents at 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03), January 6-9, in Hawaii, US.Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and
Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Palmgreen, P. and Rayburn, J. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television. Communication Research, 6(2), 155180.Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, M. A.
(2000). Perdictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402Park, J., & Cho, K. (2009). Declining Relational Trust between Government and Publics, and
Potential Prospects of Social Media in the Government Public Relations. Proceedings of EGPAConference 2009 The Public …, January 2009, 1–18. http://www.egpa2009.com/documents/psg1/ParkCho.pdfPearson, G. (2020). Sources on
social media: Information context collapse and volume of content as predictors of source blindness. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910505Prayoga, F. (2020). Gugus Tugas Covid-19 Luncurkan Situs Resmi, Berisi
Edukasi hingga Hoax Buster. Retrieved from: https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2020/03/19/337/2186044/gugus-tugas-covid-19-luncurkan-situs-resmi-berisi-edukasi-hingga-hoax-busterPunlumjeak, W., Rachburee, N., & Arunrerk, J. (2017).
Big data analytics: Student performance prediction using feature selection and machine learning on microsoft azure platform. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(1–4), 113–117.Radziwill, N. M., & Benton,
M. C. (2017). Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. April. http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579Rubin. (1994). Media Uses and Effects: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media
Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrenceikm Erlbaum Associates.Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207
/S15327825MCS0301Ruggiero, T. E. (2009). Mass communication and society uses and gratiifications theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301Stanford, S. W.
(1983). Comments on Palmgreen and Rayburn, “Gratifications sought and media exposure.” Communication Research, 10(2), 247–251.Statista. (2020). Number of Twitter users in Indonesia 2014 to 2019. Retrieved
from:https://www.statista.com/statistics/490548/twitter-users-indonesia/Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media,
Youth, and Credibility (pp. 72–100). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic
Media, 57(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1111
/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.xUlmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2002). Crisis management and the discourse of renewal: Understanding the potential for positive outcomes of crisis. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 361–365. https://doi.org
/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00165-0 White, R. A. (1994). Audience interpretation of media: Emerging perspectives. Communication Research Trends, 14(3), 3–36.Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and
gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An In ternational Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR06-2013-0041Windahl, S. (1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. Mass Communication
ReviewYearbook, 2, 174–185.
Recommended Citation
Bastari, Andi Amiratania
(2020)
"Selecting Information Sources in Times of Crisis,"
JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA: Vol. 9:
No.
2, Article 4.
DOI: 10.7454/jki.v9i2.12769
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jkmi/vol9/iss2/4
Included in
Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons