JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA
Abstract
This study examines how politainment shapes the news coverage of public officials with celebrity backgrounds (celebrity officials) in Indonesia's post-electoral governance context. Focusing on Kompas.com during the first six months of the Prabowo–Gibran administration, the study integrates theories and concepts of politainment, celebrity politics, and the public sphere to address a gap in global scholarship. Existing research has largely focused on Western democracies, electoral campaigns, and social media platforms, while paying limited attention to how politainment operates within professional online journalism in emerging democracies. Using a mixed-method approach that combines quantitative content analysis of 102 news articles with qualitative framing analysis, the findings show that Kompas.compredominantly frames celebrity officials through personalization, symbolic visibility, and affective narratives, with limited emphasis on policy substance or administrative performance. These results suggest that politainment has become institutionalized in routine political reporting not merely as a campaign strategy, but as a dominant mode of post-election public communication. This study contributes to the studies on the mediatization of politics by demonstrating how politainment in post-reform Indonesia constrains rational public discourse and poses challenges to journalistic responsibility and democratic deliberation.
Bahasa Abstract
Studi ini mengkaji bagaimana politainment mengarahkan pemberitaan tentang pejabat publik dengan latar belakang selebriti (pejabat selebriti) dalam konteks tata kelola pasca-pemilu di Indonesia. Dengan berfokus pada Kompas.com selama enam bulan pertama pemerintahan Prabowo–Gibran, studi ini mengintegrasikan teori politainment, politik selebriti, dan ruang publik untuk mengatasi kesenjangan dalam kajian global yang sebagian besar meneliti politainment di negara-negara demokrasi Barat, kampanye pemilu, dan platform media sosial, sementara mengabaikan operasinya dalam jurnalisme daring profesional di negara-negara demokrasi berkembang. Menggunakan pendekatan mixed-method yang menggabungkan analisis konten kuantitatif dari 102 artikel berita dan analisis pembingkaian kualitatif, temuan menunjukkan bahwa Kompas.com sebagian besar membingkai pejabat selebriti melalui personalisasi, visibilitas simbolik, dan narasi afektif, dengan penekanan terbatas pada substansi kebijakan atau kinerja administratif. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa politainment telah terinstitusionalisasi dalam reportase politik sehari-hari, bukan hanya sebagai strategi kampanye tetapi sebagai mode komunikasi publik paska-pemilu yang dominan. Studi ini berkontribusi pada literatur internasional tentang mediatisasi politik dengan menunjukkan bagaimana politainment di Indonesia pasca-reformasi membatasi wacana publik yang rasional dan menimbulkan tantangan terhadap tanggung jawab jurnalistik dan deliberasi demokratis.
References
Alamsyah, F. R., & Marlina, N. (2024). Pengaruh Selebriti Dalam Pencalonan Anggota Legislatif. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 14(1), 344-350. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/48765
Alvin, S. (2023, May 22). Artis dalam Politik, Membedah Tren “Politainment”. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/05/22/122507165/artis-dalam-politik-membedah-tren-politainment.
Amosin, A. J. (2017, May). Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere and its Transformation in the 21st Century [Undergraduate Thesis, University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Philosophy].
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39.https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity: How the media constructs reality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hasfi, N. (2023, December 7). Pemilih Muda dan Buaian “Politainment”. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/12/06/pemilih-muda-dan-buaian-politainment
Jati, W. R. (2014). Politik Selebritas Elaborasi Teoritik terhadap Model Kampanye Baru. Kawistara, 4(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.5672
Kasińska-Metryka, A.J. (2017). Neoleadership Paradigm. In A.J. Kńska-Metryka & T. Gajewski (Eds.). The Future of Political Leadership in the Digital Age: Neo-leadership, Image, and Influence (pp. 4-16). London, New York: Routledge.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousands Oak, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Margiansyah, D. (2019). Populisme di Indonesia Kontemporer: Transformasi Persaingan Populisme dan Konsekuensinya dalam Dinamika Kontestasi Politik Menjelang Pemilu 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 47-68. https://ejournal.brin.go.id/jpp/article/view/10782
Marsh, D., Tindall, K., & Hart, P.T. (2010). Celebrity Politics: The Politics of the Late Modernity? Political Studies Review, 8(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00215.x
Maulida. (2024, February 10). Berebut Pengaruh: Melihat Mediatisasi Selbriti dalam Kampanye Politik 2024. Kumparan.com. https://kumparan.com/saya-maulida/berebut-pengaruh-melihat-mediatisasi-selebriti-dalam-kampanye-politik-2024-2286mtZI8lk/full
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McKee, A. (2005). The Public Sphere: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNair, B. (2011). An Introduction to Political Communication (5th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Nieland, J.-U. (2008) Politainment. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ni’mah, M. (2015). Transformasi Selebriti Menjadi Politisi: Urgensi Personal Front dalam Ranah Sosial. Informasi: Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 45(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v45i2.7989
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75. https://doi.com/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Riegert, K., & Collins, S. (2016). Politainment. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (1st ed., pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc157
Sari, Y. (2018, February 9). Jurnalisme Daring, Antara Traffic dan Etik. CNN Indonesia https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180208190729-21-274915/jurnalisme-daring-antara-traffic-dan-etik
Satriawan, B. H., Haridison, A., Sandi, J. R., Iskandar, D., Utami, P. J., Irwan, A. I., & Hartaman, N. (2025). Politainment in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election and Positioning in Downstream Industry. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1-11. https://doi.com/10.3389/fpos.2024.1494578
Schultz, D. (2012) Politainment: The Ten Rules of Contemporary Politics. A Citizen's Guide to Understanding Campaigns and Elections. Minnesota, USA: The Ten Rules of Contemporary Politics.
Street, J. (2004). Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x
Subandi, H. H., & Ubaid, A. H. (2020). Selebritis Menjadi Politisi: Studi tentang Bagaimana Selebritis Menang atau Kalah dalam Pemilu Legislatif. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i1.7311
Steele, J. (2023). Digital news report 2023: Indonesia. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/indonesia
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
The Global Statistics. (2025). Indonesia Social Media Statistics 2025: Most Popular Platforms. The Global Statistics. https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/indonesia-social-media-statistics/
TSJ.ORG. (2024, November 27). Is Indonesia Experiencing Election Fatique? The Street Journal. https://thestreetjournal.org/is-indonesia-experiencing-election-fatigue/
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wahyudi, M. Z. (2023, December 18). Karakter Psikologi Pemilih Pemilu 2024. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/12/18/karakter-psikologi-pemilih-pemilu-2024
Wood, M., Corbett, J., & Flinders, M. (2016). Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116632182
Recommended Citation
Cahyani, Dewi Y.
(2026)
"Politainment and Celebrity Officials in Online Journalism: A Study of Kompas.com and Public Discourse in Indonesia,"
JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA: Vol. 14:
No.
2, Article 9.
DOI: 10.7454/jkmi.v14i2.1363
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jkmi/vol14/iss2/9
Title Page
Table-Celebrity-Politics.docx (18 kB)
List of Tables
Illustration-Celebrity-Politics.docx (77 kB)
List of Illustrations