JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA
Abstract
Studi berasumsi bahwa teori spiral kesunyian tidak sesuai dalam konteks negara transisidemokrasi karena lahir dalam konteks negara maju yang berasumsi bahwa warganegaranya memiliki akses media dan telah mencapai pendidikan tinggi. Hasil dari tigakasus yang dipelajari, korupsi Bibit-Chandra, meledaknya tabung gas, dan minoritasAhmadiyah, menunjukkan bahwa teori tersebut hanya nyata dalam kondisi tertentu.Beberapa kondisinya adalah pengetahuan politik, muatan moral, dan konformitas.Studi juga menunjukkan bahwa pengetahuan politik dan prediksi opini dominan adalahvariabel penting dalam menjelaskan kesediaan seseorang mengekspresikan opininya.
This study assumes that spiral of silence is not suitable in the context of democratictransition countries as it emerged in the context of developed countries that assumesits citizens have media access and have achieved high education. Results fromthe three cases studied, the Bibit-Chandra corruption case, the explosion of gascylinders, and the Ahmadiyah minority, show that the theory is only proven in specificcircumstances. Several of these conditions are political knowledge, moral content, andconformity. The study also shows that political knowledge and prediction of dominantopinion are important variables in explaining one’s willingness to express opinions.
References
Adoni, H. & Mane, A. (1984). Media and the social construction of reality: toward an integration of theory and research. Communication Research, 11(3), h.323-340.Breed, W. & Ktsanes,T. (1961). Pluralistic ignorance in the process of opinion
formation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(2), h.382-392.Chia, S.C. & Lee,W. (2008). Pluralistic ignorance about sex: The direct and the indirect effects of media consumption on college students misperception of sex-related peer norms. International
Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(1),h.52-73.Glynn, C.J, Hayes, A.F & Shanahan,J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence”. Public Opinion
Quarterly, 61(3), h.452-463.Gonzenbach, W. & Stevenson,R.L. (1994). Children with AIDS attending public school: An analysis of the spiral of silence. Political Communication, 11, h.3-18.Gonzalez, H. (1988). Mass media and the spiral of silence:
The Philippines from Marcos to Aquino. Journal of Communication, 38(4), h.33-48.Gunther, A. C, & Chia, S. C. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism and Mass Communication
Quarterly, 78(4), h.688-701.Huang, H. (1997). Testing the spiral of silence theory: from a crosscultural perspective. — Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Huang, H. (2005). A cross-cultural test of the sal of silence. International Journal of Public
Opinion Research, 17 (3), h.324-345.Kennamer, J. D. (1990). Self-serving biases in perceiving the opinions of others: implications for the spiral of silence, Communication Research, 17, h.393-404.Glynn, C. J., & Park, E. (1997). Reference groups,
opinion intensity, and public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(3), h.213.Lashin, Y. A. (1984). Testing the spiral of silence hypothesis: toward an integrated theory of public opinion (Disertasi doktoral). University
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Lasorsa, D.L. (1991). Political outspokenness: factors working against the spiral of silence, Journalism Quarterly, 68, h.131-40.Liu, J. (2008). A cross-national and double-sided test of spiral of silence theory: culture,
governmental form & personality. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam pertemuan rutin International Communication Association, Pusat Kongres Internasional Dresden, Dresden, Jerman.Nisbet, E.C. (2008). Media use, democratic citizenship, and
communication gaps in a developing democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), h.454- 482.Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24 (2), h.43-51.Noelle-
Neumann, E. (1977). Turbulences in the climate of opinion: Methodological applications of the spiral of silence theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(2), h.143-158.Noelle-Neumann, E. (1979). Public opinion and the classical tradition: A Reevaluation.
Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(2), h.143-156 Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin, Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Noelle-Neumann, E. (1994). We are asking the right questions?
developing measurement from theory: the influence of the spiral of silence on media effects research. Dalam Hamelink, C.J. & Linne, O. (Eds), Mass communication research on problems and policies: The art of asking right questions (h. 97-118).
New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Company.Noelle-Neumann, E. & Petersen, P. (2004). The spiral of silence and the social nature of man. Dalam Kaid, K.L. (Eds.), Handbook of political communication research (h. 339-356). Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,.O’Gorman, H. J. (1975). Pluralistic ignorance and white estimates of white support for racial segregation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(3), h.313-330.Petri, G. & Pinter, A. (2002). From social perception to public
expression of opinion: A structural equation modelling approach to the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(1), h.37-53.Salmon, Charles T. & Kline, F. G. (1985). The spiral of silence ten years later: an examination
and evaluation. Dalam Keith R. Sanders, Lynda L. Kaid & Dan Nimmo (Eds.), Political Communication Yearbook 1984 (h. 3-30). Carbondale, Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Salmon, C. T. & Glynn, C. J. (1996). Spiral of silence:
communication and public opinion as social control. Dalam M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (h. 165-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Scheufele, D. A. (2008).
Spiral of silence theory. Dalam W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research (h. 173-183). London: SAGE.Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Opinion climates, spiral of silence and biotechnology: Public opinion as a
heuristic for scientific decision-making. Dalam Brossard, D, Shanahan, J & Nesbitt, C. (Eds.), The media, the public and agricultural biotechnology (h.231-244). Cambridge: CAB International.Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of
the spiral of silence: a conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), h. 3-28.Shoemaker, P. J. et. al. (2000). Fear of social isolation: Testing an assumptionfrom the spiral of silence. Irish
Communications Review, 8 (1), h.65-78. Taylor, D.G. (1982). Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: a formal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(3), h.311-335.Van Boven, L. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and political correctness: The case
of affirmative action. Political Psychology, 21(2),h.267-276. Willnat, L. (1995). Public opinion and political outspokenness in Pre-1997 Hong Kong: two test of the spiral of silence theory. Asian Journal of Communication, 5(2), h.47-67.Willnat, L.
(1996). Mass media and political outspokenness in Hong Kong: Linking the third- person effect and the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), h.187-212.Willnat, L. et.al. (2002). Individual-level predictors of public
outspokenness: a test of the spiral of silence theory in Singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14 (4), h.391- 411.
Recommended Citation
Eriyanto, Eriyanto
(2012)
"Teori Spiral Kesunyian dan Negara Transisi Demokrasi: Sebuah Pengujian di Indonesia,"
JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA: Vol. 1:
No.
1, Article 2.
DOI: 10.7454/jki.v1i1.7808
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jkmi/vol1/iss1/2
Included in
Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons