Editorial Policies
Editorial Policies
Editorial and Peer-Review Process
The editorial and peer-review process at Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia (JKI) that every published manuscript adheres to high standards of scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical integrity, and relevance to nursing science. The process consists of the following stages:
This stage combines the initial check, editorial evaluation, administrative review, and editorial review. The manuscript undergoes an initial screening to verify compliance with submission requirements, editorial policies, publication ethics, and similarity checking (Turnitin). The Editor-in-Chief evaluates the manuscript’s suitability and scientific quality before assigning it to a Section Editor, who then assesses its originality, rigor, and overall readiness for external peer review.
⚠️ Note: If any required information is missing or if the manuscript is deemed unsuitable, it may be returned for correction or rejected before entering peer review.
The manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer-review process by at least two independent reviewers selected based on their expertise. Reviewers evaluate the scientific quality and provide recommendations for improvement.
⚠️ Note: This stage depends on reviewer availability. Reviewers are typically given two weeks to complete their evaluations after accepting the review request
Based on the reviewers' reports, the editorial decision may be "accept", "minor revision", "major revision", or "reject". Authors receiving a revision decision are expected to submit a revised manuscript within the specified timeframe (1 week for minor revision, and 2 weeks for major revision).
Manuscripts requiring major revision are usually returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation. Reviewers assess whether the authors have adequately addressed all previous comments. Additional rounds of review may be conducted if substantial issues remain unresolved.
Following the completion of peer review, the Section Editor conducts a final evaluation of the revised manuscript and submits a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief, who communicates the final publication decision to the authors.
Accepted manuscripts proceed to the production stage. The Editorial Office will coordinate:
- Article processing charge (APC) notification;
- Professional proofreading and copyediting processes;
- Layout editing and final preparation for publication.
⚠️ Note: JKI currently collaborates with Scribendi and Cambridge Proofreading Services as its preferred proofreading providers. However, authors are free to use any professional English proofreading service.
Proofreading fees are separate from the APC and may be paid after the copyediting stage.
Use of Generative AI
JKI requests that all authors declare whether they have used artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies upon submission. If used, authors must specify the technology and its intended purpose.
👉 Please complete and submit the AI Use Declaration Form along with your manuscript.
JKI's policy regarding the use of AI-assisted technologies is as follows:
- Supported use: AI may be used in the writing process strictly to improve the work's readability and language
- Prohibited use: AI must not be used to replace core researcher tasks, such as producing scientific insights, analyzing and interpreting data, drawing scientific conclusions, or making recommendations.
⚠️ Editorial assessment & transparency: Editors will evaluate the appropriateness of AI use when reviewing submissions. This declaration will be made available to peer reviewers and will be openly declared in the published paper starting from 2026 in Volume 29, Issue 2.
For further context, please see Elsevier's policy on the use of AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing.
Screening for Plagiarism
Papers submitted to JKI will be screened using Turnitin plagiarism detection tools. JKI will immediately reject papers containing plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
Prior to submission to reviewers, articles undergo a similarity and plagiarism check performed by an editorial team member. Submissions to JKI must exhibit a similarity score no greater than 15%.
↑ Back to topOpen Access Policy
JKI is an open‑access journal that offers unrestricted, worldwide access to the complete text of every article it publishes. No fees are charged to readers or their institutions for accessing the content. Readers have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in JKI.
↑ Back to topCopyright Notice and License
Authors who publish with JKI agree to the following terms:
- The authors keep the copyright to their work but give the journal the exclusive right to publish it first, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA). This license allows anyone to distribute, remix, adapt, or build upon the material in any format or medium, as long as attribution is given to the creator. Commercial use is permitted. If someone modifies or builds on the work, the resulting derivative must be shared under the same CC BY SA terms.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., submit it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Data Availability
In alignment with the guidelines established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), JKI requires authors to include a Data Availability Statement in their manuscript.
This statement must clarify whether the underlying data supporting the study’s findings are accessible to the public. To ensure transparency
- If the data are available: Authors must provide details on how to access them, including relevant links, public repositories, DOIs, or accession numbers.
- If the data cannot be shared publicly (e.g., due to ethical, legal, or privacy restrictions involving sensitive patient information): Authors must explicitly explain these restrictions and specify the conditions under which access may be granted upon reasonable request.
Article Withdrawal and Retraction
Article Withdrawal
Any manuscript withdrawn from the peer-review or publication process requires the submission of an official Article Withdrawal Letter. This letter must state the explicit reasons for the withdrawal and must be signed by the corresponding author and all listed co-authors. Withdrawing a manuscript at any point during the peer review or acceptance process will result in the author being barred from future submissions.
- For manuscripts that have already completed the final processing and publication steps, any publication fees previously paid are strictly non-refundable. The formal withdrawal of a manuscript will only be processed and finalized once the applicable withdrawal fee has been settled in full.
Failure to comply with these withdrawal terms or a refusal to pay the required fee will result in the author(s) and their accompanying institutional affiliation being barred from future submissions to JKI. Additionally, the journal reserves the right to retract or remove the authors’ previously published works from the online repository.
Article Retraction
In accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines, JKI will issue a formal retraction if the findings of a published article are determined to be unreliable. An article may be retracted under the following circumstances:
- Unreliable findings: Clear evidence shows that the conclusions are invalid due to scientific misconduct (e.g., data fabrication or falsification), honest major errors (e.g., miscalculations or experimental errors), or severe undisclosed conflicts of interest.
- Redundant publication: The findings have been previously published elsewhere without appropriate permission, justification, or cross-referencing
- Plagiarism and authorship issues: The article involves plagiarism (appropriating another’s ideas, processes, results, or words without credit) or inappropriate manipulation of authorship that compromises research integrity.
- Unethical research: The published work reports unethical research practices.
- Compromised process: An investigation reveals evidence of systematic manipulation of the peer-review or publishing process.
✉️ Email for requesting withdrawal or reporting issues: jurnal.keperawatan@ui.ac.id
↑ Back to topPrivacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered on this site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
↑ Back to top
