Evaluation of Mandibular Condyle and Coronoid Process Anomalies Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Authors

Rümeysa Şendişçi Gök, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, TurkeyFollow
Bilay Stevanovic Sancar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, TurkeyFollow
Sevcihan Günen Yılmaz, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, TurkeyFollow

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of condylar and coronoid process anomalies, their types, and their relationship to sex. Method: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were retrospectively analyzed for the presence and types of abnormalities in the condylar and coronoid processes. Statistical analysis of measurement data was performed using SPSS version 22. Medical histories of the individuals were obtained from their digital dental records. Results: CBCT images of 400 individuals were included in the study. Condylar anomalies were observed in 9.5% of cases, while coronoid anomalies were found in 7.5%. All condylar anomalies were more common in women and on the left side. Hypoplasia was the most common condylar anomaly, whereas hyperplasia was the most prevalent coronoid anomaly (6.8%). Coronoid anomalies were more frequent in males and were predominantly bilateral. Conclusion: Examining all subtypes of condylar and coronoid process anomalies in a large population without age or sex limitations will enhance dentists’ understanding of the prevalence and distribution of these anomalies in the region, aiding in better diagnosis and treatment planning.

References

1. Nayak S, Patra S, Singh G, Mohapatra C, Rath S. Study of the size of the coronoid process of mandible. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015; 14(6):66–9.
2. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Hatta T. Congenital deformities and developmental abnormalities of the mandibular condyle in the temporomandibular joint. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2008; 48(3):118–25.
3. Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44(1):20140235.
4. Caruso S, Storti E, Nota A, Ehsani S, Gatto R. Temporomandibular joint anatomy assessed by CBCT images. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:2916953.
5. Tamimi D, Jalali E. CBCT Evaluation of the TMJ. In: Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM, Silva RG, editors. Contemporary Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 143–72.
6. Poveda-Roda R, Bagan J, Carbonell E, Margaix M. Diagnostic validity (sensitivity and specificity) of panoramic X-rays in osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio. 2015; 33(3):189–94.
7. Ikeda K, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(4):495–501.
8. Zain-Alabdeen EH, Alsadhan RI. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(3):185–91.
9. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
10. Japatti S, Dhoke B, Dhalwale G, Taneja P. Condylar aplasia: A case report. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021; 7:1943–6.
11. Singh AI, Singh PM, Dey N, Singh NS. Condylar aplasia with contralateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Med Soc. 2014; 28(1):57–9.
12. Singh P, Parate AS, Abdul NS, Chandra C, Bagewadi SB, Hirpara DR. Retrospective evaluation of incidental findings of temporomandibular joint region in CBCT scans. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(12):1393–8.
13. Muñoz M, Goulart DR, Olate S, de Moraes M, Navarro P, Fariña R. Analysis of the condyle, articular fossa, and mandibular ramus in subjects with active condylar hiperplasia. Int J Morphol. 2014; 32(3):1064–8.
14. de Cóndilo ED, Detectado MB. Evaluation of the prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected on cone beam computed tomography images in a Turkish population. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(1):43–7.
15. Goh YC, Tan CC, Lim D. Coronoid hyperplasia: A review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(4):397–403.
16. Aslan KB, Çakir B. Mandibular coronoid aplasia with condylar hypoplasia: A very rare case with the review of literature. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2023; 29(1):200–4.
17. Parikh SJ, Patel HP, Shah JS. Coronoid hypoplasia with developmental anomaly: a rare clinical-radiographic finding. IP Int J Maxillofac Imaging. 2021; 7(2):80–2.
18. Dar MA, Alaparthi R, Yalamanchili S, Santosh AB. Bilateral coronoid hypoplasia and complex odontoma: A rare concurrence of developmental pathology and odontogenic tumour of the mandible. BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015:bcr2015212022.

Recommended Citation

Şendişçi Gök, R., Stevanovic Sancar, B., & Günen Yılmaz, S. Evaluation of Mandibular Condyle and Coronoid Process Anomalies Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent Indones. 2025;32(1): 11-16