•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Many root canal preparation techniques and instruments produce apically extruded materials to a certain extent depending on the preparation system adopted. The extrusion of debris from the apical foramen during chemomechanical preparation may cause postoperative pain and failure of endodontic treatment. Objective: This study evaluates the differences in the apical extrusion of debris and calcium hydroxide (CH) during endodontic instrumentation by using Reciproc Blue (RB), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and F6 Skytaper (F6). Methods: Six experimental study groups (n = 13) were established. The root canal procedures for all groups were prepared with different methods: Group I: One Shape (OS) instrumentation, CH filling for 21 days, removal of CH using RB; Group II: OS instrumentation, CH filling for 21 days, removal of CH using WOG; Group III: OS, CaOH filling for 21 days, removal of CH using F6; Group IV: root canal instrumentation using RB; Group V: root canal instrumentation using WOG; Group VI: root canal instrumentation using F6. Apically extruded debris was collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes by using the Myers and Montgomery method. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: All the tested instruments caused the extrusion of debris and irrigant from the apical foramen. The difference among the six groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The tested instruments caused similar apical extrusions of debris and irrigant during CH removal or instrumentation procedures.

References

  1. Pedrinha VF, da Silva Brandao JM, Pessoa OF, de Almeida Rodrigues P. Influence of file motion on shaping, apical debris extrusion and dentinal defects: a critical review. Open Dent J. 2018;12:189–201.
  2. Dincer A, Er O, Canakci B. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J. 2015; 48:1194–8.
  3. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, et al. Blue thermo mechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod. 2017;43:462–6.
  4. Gundogar M, Ozyurek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1192–6.
  5. Ruddle CJ. Single-file shaping technique. Available at: https://www. dentsplysirona.com/content/ dam/dentsply/pim/manufacturer/Endodontics/ GlidePath Shaping/Rotary Reciprocating Files Shaping WaveOneGold Reciprocating Files WaveOneGold 2018.
  6. Dagna A, Gastaldo G, Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Poggio C. F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of celaning efficiency. Annali di Stomatologia. 2015;7:69-74.
  7. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17:275–9.
  8. Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, Erdogan AS. Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting f ile system, Vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris. Int Endod J. 2015;48:317–22.
  9. Siqueira J, Rocas IN, Favieri A et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod. 2002:28;457–60.
  10. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016:49;255-70.
  11. De-Deus G, Brandao MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS.Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-fileProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:390–4.
  12. Keskin C, Sarıyılmaz E. Apically extruded debris and irrigants during root canal filling material removal using Resiproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, R-Endo and ProTaper Next systems. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12:272-6.
  13. Karatas E, Ersoy I, Gündüz HA, Uygun AD, Kol E, Çakıcı F. Influence of instruments used in root canal preparation on amount of apically extruded debris. Artif Organs. 2016;40:774-7.
  14. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotar y instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012;38:850–2.
  15. Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single‐file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J. 2014; 47:405–9.
  16. Topcuoğlu G, Topcuğlu HS, Akpek F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal prepartion in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:357–63.
  17. Nayak G, Singh I, Shetty S, Dahiya S. Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using two new reciprocating an done continous rottion single file systems. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:302–9.
  18. Kocak S, Kocak MM, Saglam BC, et al. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2013;39:1278– 80.
  19. Ozyurek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2016;42:1536–9.
  20. Farmakis ETR, Sotiropoulos GG, Abramovitz I, Solomonov M. Apical debris extrusion associated with oal shaped canals: a comparative study of Wave One vs Self Adjusting File. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20:2131-8.
  21. Altundasar E, Nagaş E, Uyanık O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112;31–5.
  22. Lu Y, Wang R, Zhang L, Li HL, Zheng QH, Zhou XD, Huang DM. Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni‐Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2013;46:1125-30.

Additional Files
Title debris .doc (11 kB)
Title
tablo15.03.2020.docx (15 kB)
tablo
debris figüre 1..jpg (45 kB)
figür
Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.